Literature DB >> 23262055

What's "up"? Working memory contents can bias orientation processing.

Lisa Scocchia1, Guido Marco Cicchini, Jochen Triesch.   

Abstract

We explored the interaction between the processing of a low-level visual feature such as orientation and the contents of working memory (WM). In a first experiment, participants memorized the orientation of a Gabor patch and performed two subsequent orientation discriminations during the retention interval. The WM stimulus exerted a consistent repulsive effect on the discrimination judgments: participants were more likely to report that the discrimination stimulus was rotated clockwise compared to the oblique after being presented with a stimulus that was tilted anti-clockwise from the oblique. A control condition where participants attended to the Gabor patch but did not memorize it, showed a much reduced effect. The repulsive effect was stable across the two discriminations in the memory condition, but not in the control condition, where it decayed at the second discrimination. In a second experiment, we showed that the greater interference observed in the WM condition cannot be explained by a difference in cognitive demands between the WM and the control condition. We conclude that WM contents can bias perception: the effect of WM interference is of a visual nature, can last over delays of several seconds and is not disrupted by the processing of intervening visual stimuli during the retention period.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23262055     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

3.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Visual working memory modulates low-level saccade target selection: evidence from rapidly generated saccades in the global effect paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Working memory retrieval as a decision process.

Authors:  Benjamin Pearson; Julius Raskevicius; Paul M Bays; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Turning Symbolic: The Representation of Motion Direction in Working Memory.

Authors:  Tal Seidel Malkinson; Yoni Pertzov; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  The haptic and the visual flash-lag effect and the role of flash characteristics.

Authors:  Knut Drewing; Elena Hitzel; Lisa Scocchia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual working memory contents bias ambiguous structure from motion perception.

Authors:  Lisa Scocchia; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.