Literature DB >> 23260433

Tirone David valve-sparing aortic root replacement and cusp repair for bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Fabian A Kari1, David H Liang, John-Peder Escobar Kvitting, Elizabeth H Stephens, R Scott Mitchell, Michael P Fischbein, D Craig Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The durability of valve-sparing aortic root replacement with or without cusp repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is questioned. We analyzed the results of 75 patients with a BAV undergoing Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
METHODS: Average age was 45 ± 10 years; 80% were male; 31% had 2+ or greater aortic regurgitation (AR); annular diameter averaged 28 ± 3 mm; 32% had a Sievers' type 0 BAV, and 66% underwent concomitant cusp repair (usually cusp free margin shortening) to correct prolapse. Early (6 ± 3 days) and late (2.9 ± 1.7, 1-10 years) postoperative echocardiographic results were compared (cumulative echocardiographic follow-up, 190 patient-years; median late interval, 2 years [interquartile range, 0.68, 4.2]). Seven patients remained at risk beyond 6 years. Clinical outcome and valve function were analyzed using log-rank calculations.
RESULTS: Actuarial survival was 99% ± 2%; freedom from reoperation was 90% ± 5%, infection 98% ± 2%, and stroke 100% at 6 years. After initial improvement in degree of AR (P < .001), minor subclinical progression of AR was observed (P > .5); however, freedom from AR of more than 2+ was 100%. Cusp free margin shortening was not associated with valve deterioration, but commissural suspensory polytetrafluoroethylene neochord creation (n = 4) portended a higher probability of recurrent AR (P = .025).
CONCLUSIONS: After David procedure and cusp repair in patients with a BAV, midterm clinical and valve function outcomes were favorable out to 6 years. More follow-up is required to determine long-term valve durability and the hazard of other clinically important late adverse events, including eventual reoperation, to beyond 10 years.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23260433     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  7 in total

Review 1.  Can the bicuspid aortic valve be spared? The con position, with caveats and nuances.

Authors:  Joseph E Bavaria; Caroline M Komlo; Tyler Rhode; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Current topics on bicuspid aortic valve: clinical aspects and surgical management.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 3.  Evolution of surgical therapy for Stanford acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Peter Chiu; D Craig Miller
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

4.  Aortic Valve Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Literature.

Authors:  Matthew Fok; Matthew Shaw; Elena Sancho; David Abello; Mohamad Bashir
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2014-02-01

5.  Progression of Aortic Regurgitation After Different Repair Techniques for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Fabian A Kari; Johannes Kroll; Jan Kiss; Carolin Hess; Brigitte Stiller; Matthias Siepe; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 6.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair: systematic review on long-term outcomes.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Ibrahim Sultan; Mary Siki; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-05

7.  Geometric characteristics of bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Jan Nijs; Babs Vangelder; Kaoru Tanaka; Sandro Gelsomino; Ines Van Loo; Mark La Meir; Jos Maessen; Bas L J H Kietselaer
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-08-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.