Literature DB >> 26266328

Progression of Aortic Regurgitation After Different Repair Techniques for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Fabian A Kari1, Johannes Kroll2, Jan Kiss2, Carolin Hess2, Brigitte Stiller3, Matthias Siepe2, Friedhelm Beyersdorf2.   

Abstract

We sought to characterize the incidence of AR progression and determine risk factors for AR progression in a consecutive series of infants and children after surgical correction of congenital aortic valvular and supravalvular stenosis. N = 30 patients underwent repair of the aortic valve for isolated congenital aortic valve stenosis (n = 14, 47 %) or combined with aortic regurgitation (AR, n = 16, 53%). N = 27 (90%) had a valvular and n = 3 patients (10%) presented with supravalvular pathology of their aortic valve. In n = 16 patients (53%) a bicuspid and in n = 2 (6%) patients, a unicuspid valve was present. Comparative survival was analyzed using the Cox model and log-rank calculations. Log-rank calculations were performed for variables reaching statistical significance in order to identify differences in survival between groups. Commissurotomy was performed in n = 20 patients, patch implantation in n = 4, cusp shaving in n = 8, cusp prolapse correction in n = 3, and cusp augmentation in n = 4 patients. In patients with combined dysfunction and preoperative AR, AR was successfully reduced by the initial procedure, and postoperatively the overall median AR grade was 1+ (range 0-2.5+, p = 0.001, for AR reduction among patients with any grade of preoperative AR). By the time of follow-up echocardiography, the median AR grade had significantly progressed toward 1.5+ (p = 0.004). At the time of mid-term follow-up at 3.2 years, none of the patients had moderate or severe AR grades >2.5+. Patients with a monocuspid aortic valve and patients who had some kind of patch implantation into their cusps or commissures or shaving of thickened cusps were more likely to present with progression of aortic regurgitation. Monocuspid aortic valve and patch implantation, as well as cusp shaving, are probably linked to AR progression. The standard procedure of commissurotomy results in an absolute rate of AR progression of 40 % over a medium-term follow-up period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve regurgitation; Aortic valve repair; Bicuspid aortic valve; Congenital aortic valve stenosis; Monocuspid aortic valve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26266328     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-015-1243-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  18 in total

1.  Surgical valvuloplasty versus balloon aortic dilation for congenital aortic stenosis: are evidence-based outcomes relevant?

Authors:  John W Brown; Mark D Rodefeld; Mark Ruzmetov; Osama Eltayeb; Okan Yurdakok; Mark W Turrentine
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Repair options in rheumatic aortic valve disease in young patients: potential problems with pericardial cusp extension.

Authors:  Yves d'Udekem; Varun Sharma
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  Repair of the regurgitant bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve: background, principles, and outcomes.

Authors:  Fabian A Kari; Matthias Siepe; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Stephens; David H Liang; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Fabian A Kari; Michael P Fischbein; R Scott Mitchell; D Craig Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Principles of aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Gebrine El Khoury; Laurent de Kerchove
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Results of matching valve and root repair to aortic valve and root pathology.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson; Lillian H Batizy; Eugene H Blackstone; A Marc Gillinov; Michael C Moon; Richard S D'Agostino; Edward M Nadolny; William J Stewart; Brian P Griffin; Donald F Hammer; Richard Grimm; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Mid-term outcome after surgical repair of congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis by extended aortoplasty.

Authors:  Farhad Bakhtiary; Mohammed Amer; Christian D Etz; Ingo Dähnert; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Wilfried Bellinghausen; Martin Kostelka
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-21

8.  Results of valve preservation and repair for bicuspid aortic valve insufficiency.

Authors:  Bahaaldin Alsoufi; Michael A Borger; Sue Armstrong; Manjula Maganti; Tirone E David
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2005-11

9.  Tirone David valve-sparing aortic root replacement and cusp repair for bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Fabian A Kari; David H Liang; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Elizabeth H Stephens; R Scott Mitchell; Michael P Fischbein; D Craig Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Repair of congenitally dysplastic aortic valve by bicuspidization: midterm results.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Luciani; Fabrizio De Rita; Gianluca Lucchese; Dritan Hila; Alessio Rungatscher; Giuseppe Faggian; Alessandro Mazzucco
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  Requirement for repetitive surgical approaches at supravalvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Gökmen Akkaya; Çağatay Bilen; Osman Nuri Tuncer; Yüksel Atay
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.332

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.