| Literature DB >> 23258993 |
Kais Mnafgui1, Khaled Hamden, Hichem Ben Salah, Mouna Kchaou, Mbarek Nasri, Sadok Slama, Fatma Derbali, Noureddine Allouche, Abdelfattah Elfeki.
Abstract
Obesity is a serious health problem that increased risk for many complications, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The results showed EZA, which found rich in flavonoids and phenolic compounds, exhibited an inhibitory activity on pancreatic lipase in vitro with IC(50) of 91.07 μg/mL. In vivo administration of this extract to HFD-rats lowered body weight and serum leptin level; and inhibited lipase activity of obese rats by 37% leading to notable decrease of T-Ch, TGs and LDL-c levels accompanied with an increase in HDL-c concentration in serum and liver of EZA treated HFD-rats. Moreover, the findings revealed that EZA helped to protect liver tissue from the appearance of fatty cysts. Interestingly, supplementation of EZA modulated key enzyme related to hypertension such as ACE by 36% in serum of HFD animals and improve some of serum electrolytes such as Na(+), K(+), Cl(-), Ca(2+) and Mg(2+). Moreover, EZA significantly protected the liver-kidney function by reverted back near to normal the values of the liver-kidney dysfunction indices AST&ALT, ALP, CPK and GGT activities, decreased T-Bili, creat, urea and uric acid rates. In conclusion, these results showed a strong antihypelipidemic effect of EZA which can delay the occurrence of dislipidemia and hypertension.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23258993 PMCID: PMC3520503 DOI: 10.1155/2012/620384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Flavonoid and total phenolic contents of various extracts of Zygophyllum album.
| Sample | Total flavonoid content | Total phenolic content |
|---|---|---|
| Hexane fraction | 21.8 ± 0.11 | 78.022 ± 1.56 |
| Ethyl acetate | 47.16 ± 0.23 | 394.28 ± 7.88 |
| Butanol fraction | 45.8 ± 0.23 | 403.46 ± 8.06 |
| Ethanolic extract | 40.98 ± 0.20 | 391.65 ± 7.83 |
In vitro pancreatic lipase inhibition assay of various extract of Zygophyllum album.
| Sample | Concentration ( | % inhibition | IC50 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 74.58 ± 1.13 | ||
| Fluvastatin | 50 | 86.78 ± 1.27 | 16.76 |
| 100 | 93.35 ± 1.25 | ||
|
| |||
| Hexane extract | 50 | 33.43 ± 1.11 | |
| 100 | 48.52 ± 1.42 | 103.05 | |
| 200 | 59.85 ± 1.08 | ||
|
| |||
| Ethyl | 50 | 36.88 ± 1.45 | |
| 100 | 46.23 ± 1.07 | 108.15 | |
| 200 | 59.3 ± 1.03 | ||
|
| |||
| 50 | 37.83 ± 2.02 | ||
| Butanol | 100 | 52.79 ± 1.08 | 94.71 |
| 200 | 68.86 ± 1.36 | ||
|
| |||
| 50 | 44.03 ± 1.41 | ||
| Ethanol extract | 100 | 54.86 ± 1.28 | 91.07 |
| 200 | 70.12 ± 1.17 | ||
The data are expressed in mean ± S.E.M. n = 3 in each group.
Figure 1Effect of EZA on body weight of control and HFD treated rats. Values are given as mean ± SD for group of 8 animals each. Values are statistically presented as follows: *P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats.
Figure 2Effect of EZA on leptin level of experimental rats. Values are given as mean ± SD for group of 8 animals each. Values are statistically presented as follows: *P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats.
Figure 3Effect of EZA on lipase activity in serum of control and HFD rats. Values are given as mean ± SD for groups of 8 animals each. Values are statistically presented as follows: *P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats.
Total cholesterol (T-Ch), LDL cholesterol (LDL-c), HDL cholesterol (HDL-c); and triglycerides (TGs) in serum and liver of HFD-fed rats treated with EZA.
| Groups | Control | HFD | HFD + fluv. | HFD + EZA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (mmol/L) | ||||
|
| ||||
| T-Ch | 1.67 ± 0.20 | 2.72 ± 0.14* | 1.77 ± 0.1∗# | 1.74 ± 0.1∗# |
| TGs | 0.96 ± 0.21 | 1.4 ± 0.16* | 0.96 ± 0.07∗# | 0.96 ± 0.04∗# |
| LDL-c | 0.47 ± 0.22 | 1.61 ± 0.16* | 0.49 ± 0.15∗# | 0.53 ± 0.03∗# |
| HDL-c | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 0.82 ± 0.04* | 1.04 ± 0.07# | 1.05 ± 0.06# |
|
| ||||
| Liver (mg/100 mg WT) | ||||
|
| ||||
| T-Ch | 1.08 ± 0.05 | 2.45 ± 0.15* | 1.22 ± 0.02∗# | 1.27 ± 0.05∗# |
| TGs | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 1.45 ± 0.11* | 0.72 ± 0.06∗# | 0.77 ± 0.04∗# |
| LDL-c | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 1.78 ± 0.12* | 0.45 ± 0.04∗# | 0.48 ± 0.03 ∗# |
| HDL-c | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.38 ± 0.01* | 0.49 ± 0.02∗# | 0.51 ± 0.02∗# |
WT: wet tissue. Values are given as mean ± SD for groups of 8 animals each. Values are statistically presented as follows: *P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats.
Figure 4Histopathological studies of liver in the control and experimental groups of rats. The section of the liver from a control rat showing normal architecture; liver of HFD rats showing fatty cysts apparition in liver tissues; the liver of HFD rat treated with fluvastatin or EZA; a potential protective action was shown.
Figure 5Effect of EZA on serum ACE activity of experimental rats. Values are given as mean ± SD for group of 8 animals each. Values are statistically presented as follows: *P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats.
Serum electrolytes levels of control animals and HFD-fed rats. Values are given as mean ± SD for groups of 8 animals each.
| Electrolytes | Control | HFD | HFD + fluv. | HFD + EZA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ (mmol/L) | 138.85 ± 0.75 | 129.8 ± 2.46* | 134.85 ± 1.01∗# | 137.92 ± 0.92#@ |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 4.38 ± 0.19 | 5.48 ± 0.12* | 4.8 ± 0.13∗# | 4.42 ± 0.18#@ |
| Ca2+ (mmol/L) | 2.86 ± 0.07 | 2.23 ± 0.07* | 2.52 ± 0.07∗# | 2.83 ± 0.03#@ |
| Mg2+ (mmol/L) | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 0.81 ± 0.05* | 0.98 ± 0.03∗# | 1.2 ± 0.06# |
| Cl− (mmol/L) | 111.15 ± 1.61 | 101.8 ± 1.67* | 108.72 ± 0.85∗# | 110.02 ± 1.76# |
WT: wet tissue. Values are statistically presented as follows: *P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats @ P < 0.05 significant differences to HFD rats treated with fluvastatin.
Liver profile indices (AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, CPK, and T-Bili) and kidney parameters (creatinine, urea, and uric acid) of control and experimental groups of rats. Values are given as mean ± SD for groups of 8 animals each.
| Control | HFD | HFD + fluv. | HFD + EZA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver function | ||||
|
| ||||
| AST (UI/L) | 106.7 ± 11.52 | 194.42 ± 7.63* | 128 ± 6.54∗# | 123 ± 4.37∗# |
| ALT (UI/L) | 60.57 ± 8.88 | 90.85 ± 5.75* | 71 ± 9.14∗# | 66.28 ± 5.4# |
| PAL (UI/L) | 281.28 ± 42.8 | 627.42 ± 83.73* | 365.28 ± 78.39∗# | 308.28 ± 61.54# |
| GGT (UI/L) | 3.42 ± 0.53 | 6.71 ± 0.75* | 4.57 ± 0.74∗# | 4.5 ± 1.04∗# |
| CPK (UI/L) | 3128 ± 193 | 4147 ± 198* | 3317 ± 185# | 3439 ± 170∗# |
| T-Bili ( | 1.66 ± 0.21 | 2.51 ± 0.24* | 1.6 ± 0.33# | 1.64 ± 0.26# |
|
| ||||
| Kidney function | ||||
|
| ||||
| Urea (mmol/L) | 6.35 ± 0.41 | 8.47 ± 0.27* | 6.41 ± 0.37# | 6.79 ± 0.47# |
| Uric acid ( | 62.73 ± 6.74 | 72.85 ± 6.6* | 64.77 ± 7.46# | 62.37 ± 5.14# |
| Creatinine ( | 44.7 ± 0.94 | 64.38 ± 3.56* | 41.3 ± 1.7# | 46.4 ± 1.88# |
Values are statistically presented as follows: ∗ P < 0.05 significant differences compared to controls. # P < 0.05 significant differences compared to HFD rats.