| Literature DB >> 26285827 |
Bramanage Sachini Rangika1, Pavithra Dilakshini Dayananda2, Dinithi Champika Peiris3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Boiled aqueous extract of flowers (AEF) from Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L. are used in Sri Lankan traditional Ayruvedic Medicine to manage diabetes mellitus. AEF has widely been used as a folk medicine for the treatment of various ailments due to its therapeutic activity. However, little is known concerning therapeutic activity of the extract as well as its underline mechanisms and safety. Diabetes is known to increase low-density cholesterol and decrease high-density cholesterol thus triggering coronary diseases. Hence, the primary objective of the present study is to investigate the hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of the AEF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26285827 PMCID: PMC4544794 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0807-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Effects of aqueous extreact of N. arbor-tristis flowers or control (DW) on fasting blood glucose levels of normal mice. Mice treated either with AFE of N. arbor-tristis at 250 mg/kg (□), 500 mg/kg (∆), 750 mg/kg (□) or DW (–). Glucose concentration (mg/dl) were measured prior to treatment and 1 h, 4 h post-treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; **P < 0.01
Fig. 2Linear regression analysis of N. arbor-tristis or distilled water on fasting blood glucose levels of mice. Mice were treated once either with 250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg and 700 mg/kg of AFE or DW. Fasting blood glucose level was measured prior to treatment and 2 h, 4 h post-treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (R2 = 0.546)
Fig. 3Effects of N. arbor-tristis or DW on random blood glucose levels of mice. Mice were treated once either with 1 ml of 500 mg/kg of AFE or distilled water. Random glucose level was measured prior to treatment and 2 h, 4 h post-treatment. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01
Effect of N. arbor-tristis aqueous extract of flower on oral glucose tolerance test in mice. Glucose concentration (mg/dl)
| Treatment | Pre-treatment | Post treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 3 h | 5 h | ||
| Control | 113.5 ± 14.4 | 168.2 ± 24.3 | 87.13 ± 1.91 | 82.11 ± 3.77 |
| AEF | 86.87 ± 6.75 | 155.5 ± 13.9 | 91.03 ± 6.90 | 138.4 ± 12.2 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 9. Control groups received distilled water and treatment group received 500 mg/kg of the extract. No significant difference was observed between the groups. The data was analyzed by parametric method-ANOVA
Effect of aqueous flower extract from N. arbor-tristison gastrointestinal and diaphragm glucose uptake, liver and skeletal muscle glycogen content in mice
| Parameters | Control | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal absorption of glucose (mg/dl) | 18.95 ± 2.85 | 132.3 ± 16.1* |
| Diaphragm uptake of glucose (mg/dl) | 204.5 ± 66.1 | 578 ± 83.4* |
| Glycogen content in the liver (mg/dl) | 2.238 ± 0.247 | 2.643 ± 0.284 |
| Glycogen content in skeletal muscle (mg/dl) | 0.523 ± 0.091 | 0.419 ± 0.076 |
The data are given as mean ± S.EM (n = 9). Values are statistically significant at *p < 0.05. Control group was given distilled water while test group was given 500 mg/kg of the extract. To measure diaphragm glucose uptake, and glycogen content in liver and skeletal muscles, mice were treated for 30 days. For measurement of intestinal glucose absorption, mice were treated with acute doses. The data was analyzed by parametric method-ANOVA
In vitro α-amylase inhibitory effect of aqueous flower extract from N. arbor-tristis
| Concentration mg/kg | α-amylase inhibitory activity (%) |
|---|---|
| 250 mg/kg | 8.33 |
| 500 mg/kg | 16.67* |
| 750 mg/kg | 33.33** |
Values are statistically significant at *p < 0.05, ** p<0.01. Control group was treated with distilled water while test groups were treated with 250, 500 & 750 mg/kg of the extract. To measure diaphragm glucose uptake, and glycogen content in liver and skeletal muscles, mice were treated for 30 days. For measurement of intestinal glucose absorption, mice were treated with acute doses. The data was analyzed by parametric method-ANOVA
Effects of aqueous flower extract from N. arbor-tristis on lipid profile parameters, biochemical parameters and organ weights of mice after 30 days of treatment
| Parameters | Control | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Lipid profile parameters | ||
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 127.9 ± 16.5 | 100.8 ± 11.5** |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 79.46 ± 7.46 | 37.32 ± 7.85* |
| HDL-CH (mg/dl) | 43.073 ± 22.7 | 100.8 ± 25.2* |
| LDL-CH (mg/dl | 29.73 ± 5.84 | 27.3 ± 10.8 |
| Biochemical parameters | ||
| ALT (IU/l) | 2.968 ± 0.654 | 2.476 ± 0.42 |
| AST (IU/l) | 12.618 ± 0.438 | 12.569 ± 0.325 |
| Organ weights | ||
| Liver (g) | 2.2343 ± 0.0993 | 2.1950 ± 0.0687 |
| Spleen (g) | 2.2288 ± 0.0177 | 2.2538 ± 0.0207 |
| Kidney (g) | 0.7100 ± 0.0316 | 0.2350 ± 0.0325 |
| Testes (g) | 0.2571 ± 0.0194 | 0.6475 ± 0.0177 |
The data are given as mean ± S.EM (n = 9). Values are statistically significant at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Control group was given distilled water while treated group was given 500 mg/kg of the extract. AEF: aqueous extract of flowers. HDL-CH: High density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-CH – Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ALT: Alanin aminotransferase levels; AST: serum Aspartate aminotransferase. The data was analyzed by parametric method-ANOVA
Effect of aqueous extract of flowers from N. arbor-tristis on food intake, water intake and bodyweight change in mice after 30 days of treatment
| # of Weeks | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Treatment | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Food intake (g) | Control | 0.1597 ± 0.0105 | 0.1556 ± 0.005 | 0.1543 ± 0.008 | 0.1553 ± 0.007 |
| Treatment | 0.1757 ± 0.0180 | 0.1690 ± 0.0140 | 0.1653 ± 0.007 | 0.1657 ± 0.0135 | |
| Water intake (ml) | Control | 0.2394 ± 0.0198 | 0.2369 ± 0.0176 | 0.2350 ± 0.0153 | 0.1753 ± 0.0776 |
| Treatment | 0.2668 ± 0.0173 | 0.2574 ± 0.0235 | 0.2593 ± 0.0233 | 0.2516 ± 0.0249 | |
| Body weight (g) | Control | 42.00 ± 1.25 | 42.00 ± 1.27 | 41.88 ± 1.29 | 41.63 ± 1.41 |
| Treatment | 39.67 ± 1.72 | 39.44 ± 1.69 | 39.67 ± 1.65 | 40.22 ± 1.69 | |
The data are given as mean ± S.EM (n = 9). No statistically significant differences were observed between values. Control group was given distilled water while treated group was given 500 mg/kg of the extract. The data was analyzed by parametric method-ANOVA