Literature DB >> 23255930

Comparison of KRAS/BRAF mutations between primary tumors and serum in colorectal cancer: Biological and clinical implications.

Xingxiang Pu1, Zhizhong Pan, Ying Huang, Ying Tian, Hongqiang Guo, Lin Wu, Xuexing He, Xinggui Chen, Shaodan Zhang, Tongyu Lin.   

Abstract

In colorectal cancer (CRC), KRAS and BRAF mutations in primary tumors are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR)-based therapies. However, the correlation between KRAS/BRAF mutation in primary tumors and serum has not been well studied. To evaluate the degree of concordance of KRAS/BRAF mutations between the primary tumors and the matched serum samples in CRC, serum and tumor tissues were collected from 115 patients with CRC and KRAS/BRAF mutations were examined by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencing. BRAF mutations were present in 3.5% (4/115) of the primary tumor tissue samples and 0.87% (1/115) of the serum samples. In the 4 primary tumors with BRAF mutations, identical mutations were not observed in the corresponding serum samples (κ=-0.016). KRAS mutations were observed in 32.2% (37/115) of the primary tumors and 11.3% (13/115) of the serum samples. Of the 37 tumor cases with KRAS mutations, 9 had identical mutations in the corresponding serum sample, with a concordance rate of 24.3% (9/37). Discordance was observed in 32 (27.8%) patients. The concordance between KRAS mutations in the primary tumors and KRAS mutations in the matched serums was low (κ=0.231). The results of the present study suggest that the possibility of differences in the mutational status of KRAS/BRAF between primary tumors and matched serum samples should be considered when patients are selected for anti-EGFR-based therapies.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23255930      PMCID: PMC3525490          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  36 in total

1.  KRAS and BRAF oncogenic mutations in MSS colorectal carcinoma progression.

Authors:  C Oliveira; S Velho; C Moutinho; A Ferreira; A Preto; E Domingo; A F Capelinha; A Duval; R Hamelin; J C Machado; S Schwartz; F Carneiro; R Seruca
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer in the age of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

Authors:  Peter S Yoo; Reynold I Lopez-Soler; Walter E Longo; Charles H Cha
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Bernard Nordlinger; Rene Adam; Claus-Henning Köhne; Carmelo Pozzo; Graeme Poston; Marc Ychou; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Nuclear factor-kB tumor expression predicts response and survival in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab-irinotecan therapy.

Authors:  Mario Scartozzi; Italo Bearzi; Chiara Pierantoni; Alessandra Mandolesi; Fotios Loupakis; Alberto Zaniboni; Vincenzo Catalano; Antonello Quadri; Fausto Zorzi; Rossana Berardi; Tommasina Biscotti; Roberto Labianca; Alfredo Falcone; Stefano Cascinu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  F Perrone; A Lampis; M Orsenigo; M Di Bartolomeo; A Gevorgyan; M Losa; M Frattini; C Riva; S Andreola; E Bajetta; L Bertario; E Leo; M A Pierotti; S Pilotti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations between primary and corresponding metastatic tumors in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C-H Gow; Y-L Chang; Y-C Hsu; M-F Tsai; C-T Wu; C-J Yu; C-H Yang; Y-C Lee; P-C Yang; J-Y Shih
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Di Fiore; F Blanchard; F Charbonnier; F Le Pessot; A Lamy; M P Galais; L Bastit; A Killian; R Sesboüé; J J Tuech; A M Queuniet; B Paillot; J C Sabourin; F Michot; P Michel; T Frebourg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Loupakis; A Ruzzo; C Cremolini; B Vincenzi; L Salvatore; D Santini; G Masi; I Stasi; E Canestrari; E Rulli; I Floriani; K Bencardino; N Galluccio; V Catalano; G Tonini; M Magnani; G Fontanini; F Basolo; A Falcone; F Graziano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparison of EGFR and K-RAS gene status between primary tumours and corresponding metastases in NSCLC.

Authors:  A Kalikaki; A Koutsopoulos; M Trypaki; J Souglakos; E Stathopoulos; V Georgoulias; D Mavroudis; A Voutsina
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical interest of KRAS mutation detection in blood for anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Di Fiore; F Charbonnier; B Lefebure; M Laurent; F Le Pessot; P Michel; T Frebourg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  VE1 immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in thyroid carcinoma: a review of its usefulness and limitations.

Authors:  Jong-In Na; Jo-Heon Kim; Hye-Jeong Kim; Hee-Kyung Kim; Kyung-Sub Moon; Ji-Shin Lee; Jae-Hyuk Lee; Kyung-Hwa Lee; Jong-Tae Park
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  BRAF V600E mutation and KRAS codon 13 mutations predict poor survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Fang Guo; Xin Shi; Lihua Zhang; Aifeng Zhang; Hui Jin; Youji He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Effectiveness of circulating tumor DNA for detection of KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Hao; Qiang Fu; Yan-Yan Guo; Ming Ye; Hui-Xia Zhao; Qi Wang; Xiu-Mei Peng; Qiu-Wen Li; Ru-Liang Wang; Wen-Hua Xiao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Mutation Status and Immunohistochemical Correlation of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in 260 Chinese Colorectal and Gastric Cancers.

Authors:  Qiwei Yang; Sibo Huo; Yujie Sui; Zhenwu Du; Haiyue Zhao; Yu Liu; Wei Li; Xin Wan; Tongjun Liu; Guizhen Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The diagnostic accuracy of circulating free DNA for the detection of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Xie; Li Xie; Xianrang Song
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis: Clinical Implications for Colorectal Cancer Patients. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sander Bach; Nina R Sluiter; Jamie J Beagan; Joost M Mekke; Johannes C F Ket; Nicole C T van Grieken; Renske D M Steenbergen; Bauke Ylstra; Geert Kazemier; Jurriaan B Tuynman
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-06-19

7.  Serum-Based KRASG12/G13 Mutation Detection Using Droplet Digital PCR: Clinical Implications and Limitations in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma With Tumor Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ju Seok Kim; Go Eun Bae; Seok-Hwan Kim; Min Kyung Choi; Min-Kyung Yeo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.