Literature DB >> 19088172

Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations between primary and corresponding metastatic tumors in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive non-small-cell lung cancer.

C-H Gow1, Y-L Chang, Y-C Hsu, M-F Tsai, C-T Wu, C-J Yu, C-H Yang, Y-C Lee, P-C Yang, J-Y Shih.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients predict the patients who will respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. A recent study has suggested that 33% of NSCLC showed primary tumor/metastasis discordance of EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry analysis. We intended to find out whether the EGFR mutations of primary lung cancers are concordant to that of corresponding metastatic tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed EGFR exons 18-21 from paired primary and metastatic tumors in 67 lung cancer patients who had not received TKI before tissues were sampled.
RESULTS: Using the direct sequencing method, 9 of 18 (50%) patients with EGFR mutation-positive primary lung tumors had lost the mutations in metastases. For 26 patients who were EGFR mutation positive in the metastatic tumors, 17 (65%) were negative in the primary tumors. We analyzed these paired tissues with discrepant EGFR mutations by the Scorpion Amplified Refractory Mutation System assay. Finally, the discordant rate reached 27% (18 of 67 cases).
CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations in primary lung tumors do not always reflect the same situation in metastases. Analysis of EGFR mutations in the primary lung tumor would be inadequate for planning the use of TKI for advanced NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19088172     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  90 in total

1.  Functional mutation analysis of EGFR family genes and corresponding lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takanori Hama; Yuki Yuza; Toshihito Suda; Yoshimichi Saito; Chihiro Norizoe; Takakuni Kato; Hiroshi Moriyama; Mitsuyoshi Urashima
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Tumour molecular profiling for deciding therapy-the French initiative.

Authors:  Frédérique Nowak; Jean-Charles Soria; Fabien Calvo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  The clinical, research, and social value of autopsy after any cancer death: a perspective from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee.

Authors:  Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical Validation of Discordant Trunk Driver Mutations in Paired Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer Specimens.

Authors:  Li-Hui Tseng; Federico De Marchi; Aparna Pallavajjalla; Erika Rodriguez; Rena Xian; Deborah Belchis; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Peter Illei; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 5.  Pleural involvement in lung cancer.

Authors:  Theodora Agalioti; Anastasios D Giannou; Georgios T Stathopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Correlation of early PET findings with tumor response to molecular targeted agents in patients with advanced driver-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomonobu Koizumi; Toshirou Fukushima; Daisuke Gomi; Takashi Kobayashi; Nodoka Sekiguchi; Keiko Mamiya; Kazunari Tateishi; Akane Katou; Kazuhiro Oguchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Biological resonance for cancer metastasis, a new hypothesis based on comparisons between primary cancers and metastases.

Authors:  Dongwei Gao; Sha Li
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2013-11-10

Review 8.  Systemic therapy of brain metastases.

Authors:  Harry C Brastianos; Daniel P Cahill; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Comparison of KRAS/BRAF mutations between primary tumors and serum in colorectal cancer: Biological and clinical implications.

Authors:  Xingxiang Pu; Zhizhong Pan; Ying Huang; Ying Tian; Hongqiang Guo; Lin Wu; Xuexing He; Xinggui Chen; Shaodan Zhang; Tongyu Lin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Authors:  Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.