Literature DB >> 10902553

Intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particle beams: studies of inverse treatment planning for rotation therapy.

U Oelfke1, T Bortfeld.   

Abstract

The optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for charged particle beams is a necessary prerequisite to evaluate the clinical potential of this treatment modality in comparison to IMRT with high energy photons. A theoretical study for IMRT with charged particle beams delivered by rotation therapy is presented. First, the inverse problem for two-dimensional rotation therapy with arbitrary depth dose curves is formulated. Then a numerical strategy is devised to calculate fluence profiles for the simplified case of arbitrary rotationally invariant dose distributions. This mathematical framework is applied to study various aspects of charged particle IMRT. A central topic of the investigation is the evaluation of dose delivery, based on distal edge tracking (DET) and intensity modulation. The potential of DET-IMRT with charged particle beams is studied in comparison to an optimal, conventional dose delivery technique, which employs the concept of a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Moreover, a comparison to photon IMRT is provided for simple geometric dose patterns. The technique of DET-IMRT for the delivery of a homogeneous target dose is only feasible for targets up to a critical radius, depending on the individual shape of the employed Bragg peak. The irradiation of larger targets requires energy modulation in addition to the range modulation for DET. The accurate placement of the Bragg peak with respect to the target edge is found to be of potential importance. Comparing dose delivery via DET-IMRT with the optimal SOBP technique revealed a significant advantage of DET-IMRT, especially a saved integral dose in target-adjacent healthy tissues of up to 30%, and a reduction of the penumbra at the target edge by almost 50%. A saving in integral dose to healthy tissues by a factor of 2-3 was observed for DET-IMRT in comparison to IMRT with high energy photons.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902553     DOI: 10.1118/1.599002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Clinical characterization of a proton beam continuous uniform scanning system with dose layer stacking.

Authors:  J B Farr; A E Mascia; W C Hsi; C E Allgower; F Jesseph; A N Schreuder; M Wolanski; D F Nichiporov; V Anferov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of intensity modulated x-ray therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy for selective subvolume boosting: a phantom study.

Authors:  R T Flynn; D L Barbee; T R Mackie; R Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Risk of radiogenic second cancers following volumetric modulated arc therapy and proton arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Carol Etzel; Andrew K Lee; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Is there a role for arcing techniques in proton therapy?

Authors:  Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez; Alejandro Bertolet-Reina; Ilias Karagounis; Kiet Huynh; Roger G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Proton beam therapy following resection for childhood ependymoma.

Authors:  Shannon M MacDonald; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino Lim; Li Liao; Yupeng Li; Shengpeng Jiang; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Kazumichi Suzuki; X Ronald Zhu; Daniel Gomez; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Impact of margin size on the predicted risk of radiogenic second cancers following proton arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura A Rechner; Rebecca M Howell; Rui Zhang; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A novel energy layer optimization framework for spot-scanning proton arc therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Qihui Lyu; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Reducing the cost of proton radiation therapy: the feasibility of a streamlined treatment technique for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang; Timothy G Jones; Annelise Giebeler; Phillip J Taddei; Robert D Stewart; Andrew Lee; Oleg Vassiliev
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.