OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of different iodinated contrast media with several dilutions on plaque attenuation in an ex vivo coronary model studied by multislice CT coronary angiography. METHODS: In six ex vivo left anterior descending coronary arteries immersed in oil, CT (slices/collimation 64×0.625 mm, temporal resolution 210 ms, pitch 0.2) was performed after intracoronary injection of a saline solution, and solutions of a dimeric isosmolar contrast medium (Iodixanol 320 mgI ml(-1)) and a monomeric high-iodinated contrast medium (Iomeprol 400 mgI ml(-1)) with dilutions of 1/80 (low concentration), 1/50 (medium concentration), 1/40 (high concentration) and 1/20 (very high concentration). Two radiologists drew regions of interest in the lumen and in calcified and non-calcified plaques for each solution. 29 cross-sections with non-calcified plaques and 32 cross-sections with calcified plaques were evaluated. RESULTS: Both contrast media showed different attenuation values within lumen and plaque (p<0.0001). The correlation between lumen and non-calcified plaque values was good (Iodixanol r=0.793, Iomeprol r=0.647). Clustered medium- and high-concentration solutions showed similar plaque attenuation values, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (non-calcified plaque: medium solution SNR 31.3±15 vs 31.4±20, high solution SNR 39.4±17 vs 37.4±22; calcified plaque: medium solution SNR 305.2±133 vs 298.8±132, high solution SNR 323.9±138 vs 293±123) and derived contrast-to-noise ratios (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Differently iodinated contrast media have a similar influence on plaque attenuation profiles. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Since iodine load affects coronary plaque attenuation linearly, different contrast media may be equally employed for coronary atherosclerotic plaque imaging.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of different iodinated contrast media with several dilutions on plaque attenuation in an ex vivo coronary model studied by multislice CT coronary angiography. METHODS: In six ex vivo left anterior descending coronary arteries immersed in oil, CT (slices/collimation 64×0.625 mm, temporal resolution 210 ms, pitch 0.2) was performed after intracoronary injection of a saline solution, and solutions of a dimeric isosmolar contrast medium (Iodixanol 320 mgI ml(-1)) and a monomeric high-iodinated contrast medium (Iomeprol 400 mgI ml(-1)) with dilutions of 1/80 (low concentration), 1/50 (medium concentration), 1/40 (high concentration) and 1/20 (very high concentration). Two radiologists drew regions of interest in the lumen and in calcified and non-calcified plaques for each solution. 29 cross-sections with non-calcified plaques and 32 cross-sections with calcified plaques were evaluated. RESULTS: Both contrast media showed different attenuation values within lumen and plaque (p<0.0001). The correlation between lumen and non-calcified plaque values was good (Iodixanol r=0.793, Iomeprol r=0.647). Clustered medium- and high-concentration solutions showed similar plaque attenuation values, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (non-calcified plaque: medium solution SNR 31.3±15 vs 31.4±20, high solution SNR 39.4±17 vs 37.4±22; calcified plaque: medium solution SNR 305.2±133 vs 298.8±132, high solution SNR 323.9±138 vs 293±123) and derived contrast-to-noise ratios (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Differently iodinated contrast media have a similar influence on plaque attenuation profiles. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Since iodine load affects coronary plaque attenuation linearly, different contrast media may be equally employed for coronary atherosclerotic plaque imaging.
Authors: Stefan C Saur; Hatem Alkadhi; Paul Stolzmann; Stephan Baumüller; Sebastian Leschka; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Thomas J Fuchs; Gábor Székely; Philippe C Cattin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-01-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Erica Maffei; Anselmo Alessandro Palumbo; Roberto Malagò; Ludovico La Grutta; W Bob Meiijboom; Annachiara Aldrovandi; Michele Fusaro; Luigi Vignali; Alberto Menozzi; Valerio Brambilla; Paolo Coruzzi; Massimo Midiri; Miles A Kirchin; Nico R A Mollet; Gabriel P Krestin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-10-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Kerstin Boehmer; Tobias Pflederer; Dieter Ropers; Martin Seltmann; Michael Lell; Katharina Anders; Axel Kuettner; Michael Uder; Werner G Daniel; Mohamed Marwan Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2010-01-21
Authors: S Schroeder; A F Kopp; A Baumbach; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Georg; B Ohnesorge; C Herdeg; C D Claussen; K R Karsch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: F Cademartiri; E Maffei; F Notarangelo; F Ugo; A Palumbo; D Lina; A Aldrovandi; E Solinas; C Reverberi; A Menozzi; L Vignali; R Malagò; M Midiri; N R Mollet; G Cervellin; D Ardissino Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Ernesto Di Cesare; Antonio Gennarelli; Alessandra Di Sibio; Valentina Felli; Marco Perri; Alessandra Splendiani; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Ernesto Di Cesare; Antonio Gennarelli; Alessandra Di Sibio; Valentina Felli; Alessandra Splendiani; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Z X Zhong; B Li; C R Li; Q F Zhang; Z D Liu; P F Zhang; X F Gu; H Luo; M J Li; H S Luo; G H Ye; F L Wen Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 2.590