Literature DB >> 2325524

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis without truth.

R M Henkelman1, I Kay, M J Bronskill.   

Abstract

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, the preferred method of evaluating diagnostic imaging tests, requires an independent assessment of the true state of disease, which can be difficult to obtain and is often of questionable accuracy. A new method of analysis is described which does not require independent truth data and which can be used when several accurate tests are being compared. This method uses correlative information to estimate the underlying model of multivariate normal distributions of disease-positive and disease-negative patients. The method is shown to give results equivalent to conventional ROC analysis in a comparison of computed tomography, radionuclide scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging for liver metastasis. When independent truth is available, the method can be extended to incorporate truth data or to evaluate the consistency of the truth data with the imaging data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2325524     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  21 in total

1.  Objective comparison of quantitative imaging modalities without the use of a gold standard.

Authors:  John W Hoppin; Matthew A Kupinski; George A Kastis; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.

Authors:  Zheyu Wang; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Miqu Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Evaluating Estimation Techniques in Medical Imaging Without a Gold Standard: Experimental Validation.

Authors:  John W Hoppin; Matthew A Kupinski; Donald W Wilson; Todd Peterson; Benjamin Gershman; George Kastis; Eric Clarkson; Lars Furenlid; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2003-02-15

5.  Strategies to configure image analysis algorithms for clinical usage.

Authors:  Thomas M Lehmann; Jörg Bredno
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Bayesian framework inspired no-reference region-of-interest quality measure for brain MRI images.

Authors:  Michael Osadebey; Marius Pedersen; Douglas Arnold; Katrina Wendel-Mitoraj
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-13

7.  On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Charles E Metz; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.

Authors:  Hsin-Neng Hsieh; Hsiu-Yuan Su; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Bayesian analysis and classification of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests without a gold standard.

Authors:  Jingyang Zhang; Kathryn Chaloner; James H McLinden; Jack T Stapleton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.