Literature DB >> 19691022

Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.

Hsin-Neng Hsieh1, Hsiu-Yuan Su, Xiao-Hua Zhou.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves can be used to assess the accuracy of tests measured on ordinal or continuous scales. The most commonly used measure for the overall diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic tests is the area under the ROC curve (AUC). A gold standard (GS) test on the true disease status is required to estimate the AUC. However, a GS test may sometimes be too expensive or infeasible. Therefore, in many medical research studies, the true disease status of the subjects may remain unknown. Under the normality assumption on test results from each disease group of subjects, using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm in conjunction with a bootstrap method, we propose a maximum likelihood-based procedure for the construction of confidence intervals for the difference in paired AUCs in the absence of a GS test. Simulation results show that the proposed interval estimation procedure yields satisfactory coverage probabilities and interval lengths. The proposed method is illustrated with two examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19691022      PMCID: PMC2812057          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

1.  Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests.

Authors:  N Dendukuri; L Joseph
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.

Authors:  C Enøe; M P Georgiadis; W O Johnson
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: potential and limitations as a screening examination.

Authors:  A M Masaryk; J S Ross; M C DiCello; M T Modic; L Paranandi; T J Masaryk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve.

Authors:  D K McClish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Bayesian semiparametric ROC curve estimation and disease diagnosis.

Authors:  Adam J Branscum; Wesley O Johnson; Timothy E Hanson; Ian A Gardner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.

Authors:  S L Hui; X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Confidence intervals for the receiver operating characteristic area in studies with small samples.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski; M L Lieber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.681

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.