Literature DB >> 23254800

Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives.

Florian Roser1, Marcos Tatagiba, Gottlieb Maier.   

Abstract

Even though robotic technology holds great potential for performing spinal surgery and advancing neurosurgical techniques, it is of utmost importance to establish its practicality and to demonstrate better clinical outcomes compared with traditional techniques, especially in the current cost-effective era. Several systems have proved to be safe and reliable in the execution of tasks on a routine basis, are commercially available, and are used for specific indications in spine surgery. However, workflow, usability, interdisciplinary setups, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness have to be proven prospectively. This article includes a short description of robotic structures and workflow, followed by preliminary results of a randomized prospective study comparing conventional free-hand techniques with routine spine navigation and robotic-assisted procedures. Additionally, we present cases performed with a spinal robotic device, assessing not only the accuracy of the robotic-assisted procedure but also other factors (eg, minimal invasiveness, radiation dosage, and learning curves). Currently, the use of robotics in spinal surgery greatly enhances the application of minimally invasive procedures by increasing accuracy and reducing radiation exposure for patients and surgeons compared with standard procedures. Second-generation hardware and software upgrades of existing devices will enhance workflow and intraoperative setup. As more studies are published in this field, robot-assisted therapies will gain wider acceptance in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23254800     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318270d02c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  66 in total

1.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 2.  Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Dipankar Nandi; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Feasibility of laser-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine using a hybrid-OR.

Authors:  P H Richter; F Gebhard; M Salameh; K Schuetze; M Kraus
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Current state-of-the-art and future perspectives of robotic technology in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei; Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez; Deepak Sambhara; Ehud Mendel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Liu; Weikai Chen; Zongyi Wang; Jun Lin; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Yahya A Othman; Sohrab S Virk; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

Review 7.  Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.

Authors:  John A Buza; Jeffrey L Gum; Christopher R Good; Ronald A Lehman; John Pollina; Richard V Chua; Avery L Buchholz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-09-28

8.  Radiological and clinical differences between robotic-assisted pedicle screw fixation with and without real-time optical tracking.

Authors:  Jinpeng Du; Lin Gao; Dageng Huang; Lequn Shan; Wentao Wang; Yong Fan; Dingjun Hao; Liang Yan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shutao Gao; Zhengtao Lv; Huang Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Robot guidance for percutaneous minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws for pyogenic spondylodiscitis is associated with lower rates of wound breakdown compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided instrumentation.

Authors:  Awad Alaid; Kajetan von Eckardstein; Nicolas Roydon Smoll; Volodymyr Solomiichuk; Veit Rohde; Ramon Martinez; Bawarjan Schatlo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.