Literature DB >> 23254385

Single-port laparoscopic colectomy.

M M Costedio1, F H Remzi.   

Abstract

Single-port laparoscopy (SPL) for colorectal surgery was first described for a right hemicolectomy in 2008. Since then, technology and experience have advanced, and SPL is now reported for a variety of colorectal procedures. Multiple case series and reports have demonstrated the adequate safety of SPL, but there are few reports of a measurable benefit of the technique. SPL is a difficult procedure to learn, it may have relatively high costs, and it is more difficult to perform as well as more physically and mentally taxing on the surgeon. Despite the difficulty and potentially increased cost, SPL suits colorectal patients well as they commonly have a stoma or extraction site adequate in size for a single port. There are cosmetic advantages to this technique, but they apply to a small subset of patients requiring colorectal surgery. There are many tips to incorporate SPL into practice successfully, but the procedure requires patience and experience. As surgeons become more facile with this technique, a group that derives a clear benefit beyond cosmesis will arise, likely a subset of reoperative patients requiring fecal diversion. The accompanying video demonstrates, step by step, the authors' technique of total proctocolectomy and ileo-anal pouch using a single-port device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23254385     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0935-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques.

Authors:  Ramon Berguer; Jerry Chen; Warren D Smith
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy.

Authors:  James Adair; Mark A Gromski; Robert B Lim; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Outcomes for case-matched single-port colectomy are comparable with conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  A M Wolthuis; F Penninckx; S Fieuws; A D'Hoore
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series.

Authors:  Diego I Ramos-Valadez; Madhu Ragupathi; Javier Nieto; Chirag B Patel; Steven Miller; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluation of commercially available port access devices for single-incision laparoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel Cusati; James M Swain; Michael Kendrick; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  Single-port access laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation.

Authors:  D W Borowski; V Kanakala; A K Agarwal; M A Tabaqchali; D K Garg; T S Gill
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain.

Authors:  M Asakuma; M Hayashi; K Komeda; T Shimizu; F Hirokawa; Y Miyamoto; J Okuda; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Gyusung Lee; F Jacob Seagull; Nora Meenaghan; David Dexter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Laparoscopic single-port colectomy for sigmoid cancer.

Authors:  F H Remzi; H T Kirat; D P Geisler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Laparoscopic segmental resection of the sigmoid colon for endometriosis.

Authors:  D B Redwine; D R Sharpe
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using the intended stoma site as the multichannel port.

Authors:  Takahisa Ishikawa; Shigenori Homma; Susumu Shibasaki; Tadashi Yoshida; Nozomi Minagawa; Hideki Kawamura; Norihiko Takahashi; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Single-port laparoscopic colorectal resections in obese patients are as safe and effective as conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Matthias Turina; Emre Gorgun; Luca Stocchi; Feza H Remzi; Meagan M Costedio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Experience of single-incision laparoscopy in children.

Authors:  Yung Ching Ming; Wendy Yang; Jeng Chang Chen; Pei Yeh Chang; Jin Yao Lai
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Comparison of hospital costs for single-port and conventional laparoscopic colorectal resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  B Sulu; E Gorgun; E Aytac; M M Costedio; R P Kiran; F H Remzi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a report of 33 cases in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Saud Aldeghaither; Ahmad Zubaidi; Khayal Alkhayal; Omar Al-Obaid
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.