Literature DB >> 23252854

Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.

David Madrid-Costa1, Santiago García-Lázaro, César Albarrán-Diego, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Robert Montés-Micó.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses (CLs).
METHODS: In this cross-over study design 20 presbyopic subjects were fitted with two different simultaneous vision multifocal CLs (the PureVision Multifocal Low Add and Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia) in random order. After 1 month, binocular distance visual acuity (BDVA) under photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (3 cd/m(2)) conditions, binocular near visual acuity (BNVA), binocular distance contrast sensitivity function (CSF) under photopic and mesopic conditions, binocular near CSF and defocus curve were measured. Subjects were then refitted with the alternative correction and the procedure was repeated.
RESULTS: Mean BDVA under photopic conditions was similar for the Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia and PureVision Multifocal Low Add: 0.01 ± 0.08 and 0.00 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively (P = 0.45). Under mesopic conditions the values of BDVA were 0.20 ± 0.58 and 0.11 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively (P = 0.005). Mean BNVA was 0.20 ± 0.05 and 0.15 ± 0.08 logMAR for the Acuvue Oasys and PureVision Low Add, respectively (P = 0.06). Binocular distance CSF testing revealed no statistically significant differences between lenses under photopic, mesopic or near conditions. Both lenses provided a comparable intermediate visual acuity.
CONCLUSIONS: Both simultaneous vision multifocal CLs provided adequate distance visual quality under photopic and mesopic conditions, and better visual acuity was provided under mesopic conditions for the Purevision lens. Both lenses provided adequate visual performance at intermediate distance, but the near visual acuity appears to be insufficient for early presbyopes who require a moderately demanding near visual quality. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
© 2012 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23252854     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

1.  Accommodation and Phoria in Children Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Celia R Gong; David Troilo; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.

Authors:  Daniel Tilia; Anna Munro; Jiyoon Chung; Jennifer Sha; Shona Delaney; Danny Kho; Varghese Thomas; Klaus Ehrmann; Ravi Chandra Bakaraju
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-05-07

3.  Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Klaus Ehrmann; Arthur Ho
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-06-09

4.  Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 2. Visual performance after 1 week of lens wear.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Daniel Tilia; Jennifer Sha; Jennie Diec; Jiyoon Chung; Danny Kho; Shona Delaney; Anna Munro; Varghese Thomas
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-06-12

5.  Optimization of the Light Sword Lens for Presbyopia Correction.

Authors:  Walter Torres-Sepúlveda; Alejandro Mira-Agudelo; John Fredy Barrera-Ramírez; Krzysztof Petelczyc; Andrzej Kolodziejczyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance.

Authors:  Cathleen Fedtke; Klaus Ehrmann; Varghese Thomas; Ravi C Bakaraju
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 7.  Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control.

Authors:  Laura Remón; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Ana I Amorim-de-Sousa; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Short-term tear film stability, optical quality and visual performance in two dual-focus contact lenses for myopia control with different optical designs.

Authors:  José Vicente García-Marqués; Rute Juliana Macedo-De-Araújo; Colm McAlinden; Miguel Faria-Ribeiro; Alejandro Cerviño; José Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.992

9.  Short-term neural adaptation to simultaneous bifocal images.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Carlos Dorronsoro; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.