Literature DB >> 23248117

Contrasting hypoxic effects on breast cancer stem cell hierarchy is dependent on ER-α status.

Hannah Harrison1, Lynsey Rogerson, Hannah J Gregson, Keith R Brennan, Robert B Clarke, Göran Landberg.   

Abstract

Tumor hypoxia is often linked to decreased survival in patients with breast cancer and current therapeutic strategies aim to target the hypoxic response. One way in which this is done is by blocking hypoxia-induced angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic therapies show some therapeutic potential with increased disease-free survival, but these initial promising results are short lived and followed by tumor progression. We hypothesized that this may be due to altered cancer stem cell (CSC) activity resulting from increased tumor hypoxia. We studied the effects of hypoxia on CSC activity, using in vitro mammosphere and holoclone assays as well as in vivo limiting dilution experiments, in 13 patient-derived samples and four cell lines. There was a HIF-1α-dependent CSC increase in ER-α-positive cancers following hypoxic exposure, which was blocked by inhibition of estrogen and Notch signaling. A contrasting decrease in CSC was seen in ER-α-negative cancers. We next developed a xenograft model of cell lines and patient-derived samples to assess the hypoxic CSC response. Varying sizes of xenografts were collected and analyzed for HIF1-α expression and CSC. The same ER-α-dependent contrasting hypoxic-CSC response was seen validating the initial observation. These data suggest that ER-α-positive and negative breast cancer subtypes respond differently to hypoxia and, as a consequence, antiangiogenic therapies will not be suitable for both subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23248117     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  29 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cells and chemoresistance: The smartest survives the raid.

Authors:  Jihe Zhao
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 2.  Cancer Stem Cells: The Architects of the Tumor Ecosystem.

Authors:  Briana C Prager; Qi Xie; Shideng Bao; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Cancer Stem Cells under Hypoxia as a Chemoresistance Factor in Breast and Brain.

Authors:  Spencer W Crowder; Daniel A Balikov; Yu-Shik Hwang; Hak-Joon Sung
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2014-03

4.  Autocrine/paracrine erythropoietin regulates migration and invasion potential and the stemness of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Ke Liang; Songbo Qiu; Yang Lu; Zhen Fan
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 5.  Unravelling cancer stem cell potential.

Authors:  Benjamin Beck; Cédric Blanpain
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  A proposed quantitative index for assessing the potential contribution of reprogramming to cancer stem cell kinetics.

Authors:  Xuefeng Gao; J Tyson McDonald; Mamta Naidu; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  Patient-derived scaffolds influence secretion profiles in cancer cells mirroring clinical features and breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Emma Persson; Pernilla Gregersson; Anna Gustafsson; Paul Fitzpatrick; Sara Rhost; Anders Ståhlberg; Göran Landberg
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 5.712

8.  Oestrogen increases the activity of oestrogen receptor negative breast cancer stem cells through paracrine EGFR and Notch signalling.

Authors:  Hannah Harrison; Bruno M Simões; Lynsey Rogerson; Sacha J Howell; Göran Landberg; Robert B Clarke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Sunitinib significantly suppresses the proliferation, migration, apoptosis resistance, tumor angiogenesis and growth of triple-negative breast cancers but increases breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Edmund Chinchar; Kristina L Makey; John Gibson; Fang Chen; Shelby A Cole; Gail C Megason; Srinivassan Vijayakumar; Lucio Miele; Jian-Wei Gu
Journal:  Vasc Cell       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 10.  ALDH1A1 expression correlates with clinicopathologic features and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Dong-lai Lv; Jiang-jie Duan; Sen-lin Xu; Jing-fang Zhang; Xiao-jun Yang; Xia Zhang; You-hong Cui; Xiu-wu Bian; Shi-Cang Yu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.