Literature DB >> 28616600

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in UK: current status and future perspectives.

Muhammad Shafique Sajid1, Madhusoodhana Hebbar2, Mazin E Sayegh2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the literature and report the various minimally invasive methods used to treat gastric cancer in the UK and compare it with worldwide practice. Published randomised studies, non-randomised studies and case series reporting the use of minimal invasive approach to treat gastric cancer were retrieved from the search of standard medical electronic databases and their outcomes were highlighted suggesting their effectiveness. Several randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have proven the clinical and oncological safety of the laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Similarly, robot-assisted gastrectomy, EMR (endoscopic mucosal resection) and ESD (endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection) have also been proven feasible and safe to treat gastric cancer of various stages in prospective and retrospective comparative studies. However, UK based studies on minimally invasive surgery to treat gastric cancer is scarce and the paucity of trials led to uncertain outcomes. Laparoscopic gastrectomy, robot-assisted gastrectomy, EMR and ESD are feasible procedures in terms of clinical and oncological safety but mainly being practiced in Asian countries with high prevalence of stomach cancer. The UK based practice is still small and limited but the introduction of MIGOCS and STOMACH trial might help to widen the application of this technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); laparoscopic gastrectomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28616600      PMCID: PMC5460175          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2017.04.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  46 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J Esteban Varela; Michael Hiyashi; Tien Nguyen; Allen Sabio; Samuel E Wilson; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  [Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer].

Authors:  T Hamada; K Kondo; Y Itagaki; J Nishida
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  1996-05

Review 3.  Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  I D Kostakis; A Alexandrou; E Armeni; C Damaskos; G Kouraklis; T Diamantis; C Tsigris
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.360

4.  Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  B W Eom; H M Yoon; K W Ryu; J H Lee; S J Cho; J Y Lee; C G Kim; I J Choi; J S Lee; M C Kook; J Y Rhee; S R Park; Y W Kim
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer management.

Authors:  W Ziqiang; Q Feng; C Zhimin; W Miao; Q Lian; L Huaxing; Y Peiwu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Ochiai; H Shimada; Y Gunji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.

Authors:  Erin K Greenleaf; Susie X Sun; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Joyce Wong
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Shiro Kikuchi; Nobue Futawatari; Natsuya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Guoqin Wang; Leon Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Randomized comparison of surgical stress and the nutritional status between laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Takaki Yoshikawa; Tsutomu Hayashi; Shinichi Hasegawa; Kazuhito Tsuchida; Takanobu Yamada; Haruhiko Cho; Takashi Ogata; Hirohito Fujikawa; Norio Yukawa; Takashi Oshima; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial).

Authors:  Leonie Haverkamp; Hylke J F Brenkman; Maarten F J Seesing; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Misha D P Luyer; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan J B van Lanschot; Wobbe O de Steur; Henk H Hartgrink; Jan H M B Stoot; Karel W E Hulsewé; Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen; Jeroen E Rütter; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Marc J van Det; Donald L van der Peet; Freek Daams; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders; Henk F van Stel; Miangela M Lacle; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.