Literature DB >> 23247735

Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing.

Kyle A Perry1, Ambar Banarjee, James Liu, Nilay Shah, Mark R Wendling, W Scott Melvin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anastomotic leak and stricture after esophagectomy remains high. Gastric devascularization followed by delayed esophageal resection has been proposed to minimize these complications. We investigated the effect of ischemic conditioning duration on anastomotic wound healing in an animal model of esophagogastrectomy.
METHODS: North American opossums were randomized to four study groups. Group A underwent immediate resection and gastroesophageal anastomosis. Groups B, C, and D were treated with delayed resection and anastomosis after a gastric ischemic conditioning period of 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Gastric conditioning was performed by ligating the left, right, and short gastric vessels. An intraabdominal esophagogastric resection and anastomosis was performed, followed by euthanasia 10 days later. Outcome variables included anastomotic bursting pressure, microvessel concentration, tissue inflammation, and collagen deposition.
RESULTS: Twenty-four opossums were randomized to groups A (n = 7), B (n = 8), C (n = 5), and D (n = 4). Subclinical anastomotic leak was discovered at necropsy in 5 animals: 3 in group A, and 1 each in groups B and C (p = 0.295). The anastomotic bursting pressure did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.545). A 7 day ischemic conditioning time did not produce increased neovascularity (p = 0.900), but animals with a 30 day conditioning time showed significantly increased microvessel counts compared to unconditioned animals (p = 0.016). The degree of inflammation at the healing anastomosis decreased significantly as the ischemic conditioning period increased (p = 0.003). Increasing delay interval was also associated with increased muscularis propria preservation (p = 0.001) and decreased collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis (p = 0.020).
CONCLUSIONS: Animals treated with 30 days of gastric ischemic conditioning showed significantly increased neovascularity and muscularis propria preservation and decreased inflammation and collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis. These data suggest that an ischemic conditioning period longer than 7 days is required to achieve the desired effect on wound healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23247735     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2535-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Rentz; David Bull; David Harpole; Stephen Bailey; Leigh Neumayer; Theodore Pappas; Barbara Krasnicka; William Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Shukri Khuri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Pernilla Viklund; Mats Lindblad; Ming Lu; Weimin Ye; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Effects of mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion on small bowel electrical activity.

Authors:  S S Hegde; S A Seidel; J K Ladipo; L A Bradshaw; S Halter; W O Richards
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry.

Authors:  J P Pierie; P W De Graaf; H Poen; I Van der Tweel; H Obertop
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994-11

5.  Recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor165 gene therapy improves anastomotic healing in an animal model of ischemic esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  C K Enestvedt; L Hosack; T Hoppo; K A Perry; R W O'Rourke; S R Winn; J G Hunter; B A Jobe
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 6.  Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels.

Authors:  Kathleen Gondek; Pierre-Philippe Sagnier; Kim Gilchrist; J Michael Woolley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Case volume as a predictor of inpatient mortality after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Michael Rodgers; Blair A Jobe; Robert W O'Rourke; Brett Sheppard; Brian Diggs; John G Hunter
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-09

8.  Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition.

Authors:  John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Preoperative embolization of gastric arteries for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  S Akiyama; S Ito; H Sekiguchi; M Fujiwara; J Sakamoto; K Kondo; Y Kasai; K Ito; H Takagi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Delayed esophagogastrostomy: a safe strategy for management of patients with ischemic gastric conduit at time of esophagectomy.

Authors:  Arzu Oezcelik; Farzaneh Banki; Steven R DeMeester; Jessica M Leers; Shahin Ayazi; Emmanuele Abate; Jeffrey A Hagen; John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for the measurement of ischemic conditioning effects of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hannes Köhler; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Marianne Maktabi; Manuel Barberio; Jonathan Takoh; Nico Holfert; Yusef Moulla; Stefan Niebisch; Michele Diana; Thomas Neumuth; Sebastian M Rabe; Claire Chalopin; Andreas Melzer; Ines Gockel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Gastric Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy Is Associated with Decreased Stricture Rate and Overall Anastomotic Complications.

Authors:  Steve R Siegal; Abhishek D Parmar; Kelly R Haisley; Brandon H Tieu; Paul H Schipper; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A successful clinical pathway protocol for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz; Desmond M D'Souza; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach increases neovascularization of the gastric conduit in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Thai H Pham; Shelby D Melton; Patrick J McLaren; Ali A Mokdad; Sergio Huerta; David H Wang; Kyle A Perry; Hope L Hardaker; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning.

Authors:  V Prochazka; F Marek; L Kunovsky; R Svaton; T Grolich; P Moravcik; M Farkasova; Z Kala
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  David S Strosberg; Robert E Merritt; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Use of bioabsorbable staple reinforcement material in side-to-side anastomoses: Suture line reinforcement of the weak point of the anastomosis.

Authors:  Masahiro Kimura; Yukio Terashita
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-23

8.  The ISCON-trial protocol: laparoscopic ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and arterial calcifications.

Authors:  A van der Veen; L M Schiffmann; R van Hillegersberg; W Schröder; E M de Groot; I Bartella; P A de Jong; A S Borggreve; L A A Brosens; D Pinto Dos Santos; H Fuchs; J P Ruurda; C J Bruns
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Neovascularization after ischemic conditioning of the stomach and the influence of follow-up neoadjuvant chemotherapy thereon.

Authors:  Vadim Prudius; Vladimír Procházka; Zdeněk Pavlovský; Adam Peštál; Petr Vlček; Ivan Čapov; Lenka Veverková; Michal Reška
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  Laparoscopic ischaemic conditioning of the gastric conduit prior to a hybrid mckeown oesophagectomy may not decrease the risk of anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Nader Hanna; Zuhaib M Mir; Erin Williams; Shaila J Merchant; Boris Zevin; Wiley Chung
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 1.195

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.