Kyle A Perry1, Ambar Banarjee, James Liu, Nilay Shah, Mark R Wendling, W Scott Melvin. 1. Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Ohio State University, N711 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Kyle.perry@osumc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of anastomotic leak and stricture after esophagectomy remains high. Gastric devascularization followed by delayed esophageal resection has been proposed to minimize these complications. We investigated the effect of ischemic conditioning duration on anastomotic wound healing in an animal model of esophagogastrectomy. METHODS: North American opossums were randomized to four study groups. Group A underwent immediate resection and gastroesophageal anastomosis. Groups B, C, and D were treated with delayed resection and anastomosis after a gastric ischemic conditioning period of 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Gastric conditioning was performed by ligating the left, right, and short gastric vessels. An intraabdominal esophagogastric resection and anastomosis was performed, followed by euthanasia 10 days later. Outcome variables included anastomotic bursting pressure, microvessel concentration, tissue inflammation, and collagen deposition. RESULTS: Twenty-four opossums were randomized to groups A (n = 7), B (n = 8), C (n = 5), and D (n = 4). Subclinical anastomotic leak was discovered at necropsy in 5 animals: 3 in group A, and 1 each in groups B and C (p = 0.295). The anastomotic bursting pressure did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.545). A 7 day ischemic conditioning time did not produce increased neovascularity (p = 0.900), but animals with a 30 day conditioning time showed significantly increased microvessel counts compared to unconditioned animals (p = 0.016). The degree of inflammation at the healing anastomosis decreased significantly as the ischemic conditioning period increased (p = 0.003). Increasing delay interval was also associated with increased muscularis propria preservation (p = 0.001) and decreased collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Animals treated with 30 days of gastric ischemic conditioning showed significantly increased neovascularity and muscularis propria preservation and decreased inflammation and collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis. These data suggest that an ischemic conditioning period longer than 7 days is required to achieve the desired effect on wound healing.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of anastomotic leak and stricture after esophagectomy remains high. Gastric devascularization followed by delayed esophageal resection has been proposed to minimize these complications. We investigated the effect of ischemic conditioning duration on anastomotic wound healing in an animal model of esophagogastrectomy. METHODS:North American opossums were randomized to four study groups. Group A underwent immediate resection and gastroesophageal anastomosis. Groups B, C, and D were treated with delayed resection and anastomosis after a gastric ischemic conditioning period of 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Gastric conditioning was performed by ligating the left, right, and short gastric vessels. An intraabdominal esophagogastric resection and anastomosis was performed, followed by euthanasia 10 days later. Outcome variables included anastomotic bursting pressure, microvessel concentration, tissue inflammation, and collagen deposition. RESULTS: Twenty-four opossums were randomized to groups A (n = 7), B (n = 8), C (n = 5), and D (n = 4). Subclinical anastomotic leak was discovered at necropsy in 5 animals: 3 in group A, and 1 each in groups B and C (p = 0.295). The anastomotic bursting pressure did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.545). A 7 day ischemic conditioning time did not produce increased neovascularity (p = 0.900), but animals with a 30 day conditioning time showed significantly increased microvessel counts compared to unconditioned animals (p = 0.016). The degree of inflammation at the healing anastomosis decreased significantly as the ischemic conditioning period increased (p = 0.003). Increasing delay interval was also associated with increased muscularis propria preservation (p = 0.001) and decreased collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Animals treated with 30 days of gastric ischemic conditioning showed significantly increased neovascularity and muscularis propria preservation and decreased inflammation and collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis. These data suggest that an ischemic conditioning period longer than 7 days is required to achieve the desired effect on wound healing.
Authors: C K Enestvedt; L Hosack; T Hoppo; K A Perry; R W O'Rourke; S R Winn; J G Hunter; B A Jobe Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: John W Briel; Anand P Tamhankar; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester; Jan Johansson; Emmanouel Choustoulakis; Jeffrey H Peters; Cedric G Bremner; Tom R DeMeester Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Arzu Oezcelik; Farzaneh Banki; Steven R DeMeester; Jessica M Leers; Shahin Ayazi; Emmanuele Abate; Jeffrey A Hagen; John C Lipham; Tom R DeMeester Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Hannes Köhler; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Marianne Maktabi; Manuel Barberio; Jonathan Takoh; Nico Holfert; Yusef Moulla; Stefan Niebisch; Michele Diana; Thomas Neumuth; Sebastian M Rabe; Claire Chalopin; Andreas Melzer; Ines Gockel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Steve R Siegal; Abhishek D Parmar; Kelly R Haisley; Brandon H Tieu; Paul H Schipper; John G Hunter; James P Dolan Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Thai H Pham; Shelby D Melton; Patrick J McLaren; Ali A Mokdad; Sergio Huerta; David H Wang; Kyle A Perry; Hope L Hardaker; James P Dolan Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: V Prochazka; F Marek; L Kunovsky; R Svaton; T Grolich; P Moravcik; M Farkasova; Z Kala Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: A van der Veen; L M Schiffmann; R van Hillegersberg; W Schröder; E M de Groot; I Bartella; P A de Jong; A S Borggreve; L A A Brosens; D Pinto Dos Santos; H Fuchs; J P Ruurda; C J Bruns Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Vadim Prudius; Vladimír Procházka; Zdeněk Pavlovský; Adam Peštál; Petr Vlček; Ivan Čapov; Lenka Veverková; Michal Reška Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 1.195