Literature DB >> 19476888

Delayed esophagogastrostomy: a safe strategy for management of patients with ischemic gastric conduit at time of esophagectomy.

Arzu Oezcelik1, Farzaneh Banki, Steven R DeMeester, Jessica M Leers, Shahin Ayazi, Emmanuele Abate, Jeffrey A Hagen, John C Lipham, Tom R DeMeester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ischemia of the gastric conduit remains an important complication of esophagectomy and is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak and sepsis. We report a group of patients with multiple comorbid conditions and an ischemic gastric conduit that was successfully managed by a delayed esophagogastrostomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Between 2000 and 2007, esophagectomy with gastric pullup was performed in 554 patients. In 37 patients (7%), the combination of an ischemic graft and substantial comorbid conditions prompted delayed reconstruction to avoid an immediate esophagogastrostomy. In these patients, the gastric conduit was brought up and secured in the neck, and a cervical esophagostomy was constructed. Subsequently, a delayed esophagogastrostomy was performed through neck incision. Outcomes were analyzed at a median of 22 months (interquartile range [IQR], 13 to 30 months).
RESULTS: There were 29 male and 8 female patients, with a median age of 65 years (IQR, 58 to 75 years). Thirty-one patients had malignant disease; 12 received neoadjuvant therapy. All 37 patients recovered from their esophagectomy without evidence of ischemic necrosis or fistula from their gastric conduit. In 35 patients, a delayed esophagogastrostomy was performed at a median of 98 days (IQR, 89 to 110 days). At the time of reconstruction, all had well-perfused gastric conduits, and the anastomoses healed without leak, wound infection, or sepsis. A stricture developed in three patients and was treated with dilation. Delayed esophagogastrostomy was never performed in two patients because of development of recurrent malignant disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed esophagogastrostomy is a safe strategy for management of patients with comorbidities and an ischemic gastric conduit at the time of esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19476888     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  5 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning.

Authors:  V Prochazka; F Marek; L Kunovsky; R Svaton; T Grolich; P Moravcik; M Farkasova; Z Kala
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; Ambar Banarjee; James Liu; Nilay Shah; Mark R Wendling; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jörg Zehetner; Steven R DeMeester; Evan T Alicuben; Daniel S Oh; John C Lipham; Jeffrey A Hagen; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: An up-to-date literature review.

Authors:  Antonios Athanasiou; Mairead Hennessy; Eleftherios Spartalis; Benjamin H L Tan; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.