Susanne Thayssen1, Dorte Gilså Hansen2, Jens Søndergaard2,3, Mette Terp Høybye4, Palle Mark Christensen5, Helle Ploug Hansen3. 1. National Research Center of Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. sthayssen@health.sdu.dk. 2. National Research Center of Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. 3. Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark. 4. Interdisciplinary Research Unit, Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark. 5. General Practitioners, Lærkevej 14, Otterup, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systematic assessments of cancer patients' rehabilitation needs are recommended, and questionnaires are considered to be useful tools when making such assessments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experience of completing a questionnaire about their problems and distress at home prior to a needs assessment in general practice. METHODS: Sixteen patients were recruited by their general practitioners (GPs). Semi-structured interviews were conducted in the home of the participants and at the general practice, with one interview taking place over the phone. Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Twelve women and four men aged between 49 and 83 years of age, and diagnosed with various cancers between 1 month and 4 years ago, participated in the study. The results showed how the completion of a questionnaire at home provided patients with an opportunity to reflect on different problems, and the importance of these problems to the patient's everyday life, as well as an opportunity to articulate which problems they wanted to discuss with their GPs. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that completing a questionnaire seems to stimulate patients' ability to reflect on their situation, clarify the importance of different problems to their everyday lives, and articulate these considerations to their GPs. Furthermore, we have shown that a questionnaire has the ability to interact with the patient and instigate a process of awareness. It is important to acknowledge this process of interaction between patient and questionnaire as an important part of understanding how and why questionnaires may support the patient when completing a questionnaire prior to a clinical encounter.
BACKGROUND: Systematic assessments of cancerpatients' rehabilitation needs are recommended, and questionnaires are considered to be useful tools when making such assessments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experience of completing a questionnaire about their problems and distress at home prior to a needs assessment in general practice. METHODS: Sixteen patients were recruited by their general practitioners (GPs). Semi-structured interviews were conducted in the home of the participants and at the general practice, with one interview taking place over the phone. Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Twelve women and four men aged between 49 and 83 years of age, and diagnosed with various cancers between 1 month and 4 years ago, participated in the study. The results showed how the completion of a questionnaire at home provided patients with an opportunity to reflect on different problems, and the importance of these problems to the patient's everyday life, as well as an opportunity to articulate which problems they wanted to discuss with their GPs. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that completing a questionnaire seems to stimulate patients' ability to reflect on their situation, clarify the importance of different problems to their everyday lives, and articulate these considerations to their GPs. Furthermore, we have shown that a questionnaire has the ability to interact with the patient and instigate a process of awareness. It is important to acknowledge this process of interaction between patient and questionnaire as an important part of understanding how and why questionnaires may support the patient when completing a questionnaire prior to a clinical encounter.
Authors: Lahiru Russell; Karla Gough; Allison Drosdowsky; Penelope Schofield; Sanchia Aranda; Phyllis N Butow; Jennifer A Westwood; Mei Krishnasamy; Jane M Young; Jo Phipps-Nelson; Dorothy King; Michael Jefford Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Sally Thorne; T Gregory Hislop; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Valerie Oglov; John L Oliffe; Kelli I Stajduhar Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Floortje K Ploos van Amstel; Sanne W van den Berg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Marieke F M Gielissen; Judith B Prins; Petronella B Ottevanger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bojoura Schouten; Dominiek De Jonckheere; Marc Aerts; Jochen Decaestecker; Daan Walgraeve; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Johan Hellings Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Anne Nicolaisen; Gitte Bruun Lauridsen; Peter Haastrup; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Deborah N Lo-Fo-Wong; Hanneke C de Haes; Neil K Aaronson; Doris L van Abbema; Jolien M Admiraal; Mathilda D den Boer; Marjan van Hezewijk; Marcelle Immink; Ad A Kaptein; Marian B Menke-Pluijmers; Nicola S Russell; Manon Schriek; Sieta Sijtsema; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Mirjam A Sprangers Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.267