Literature DB >> 23243616

HSP90 inhibitor antagonizing MIF: The specifics of pleiotropic cancer drug candidates.

Ramona Schulz1, Matthias Dobbelstein, Ute M Moll.   

Abstract

Constitutively stabilized HSP90 client proteins are crucial for cancer cell survival and proliferation. Thus, despite-or perhaps because of-their pleiotropic effects on variety of critical oncoproteins, HSP90 inhibitors represent a promising new class of anticancer drugs. We identified MIF as an essential HSP90 client protein in a murine model of Her2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23243616      PMCID: PMC3518525          DOI: 10.4161/onci.21173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


One major trend in modern cancer therapy is to develop drugs that target a specific signaling pathway, aimed at achieving the selective killing of cancer cells with reduced side effects for normal tissues. Examples of this trend include inhibitors of the oncogenic protein kinases, ERBB2 (HER2) and BCR-ABL, which interfere with hyperactivated survival signaling. Such selective (“clean”) inhibitors are initially quite effective. However, the long-term use of these compounds is often limited by the acquisition of resistance, either upon the mutation of drug targets or by other bypass mechanisms that cancer cells develop in response to this selective pressure. In contrast, pleiotropic (“dirty”) drugs simultaneously affect several regulatory pathways that are requied for the survival of cancer cells, thus being less prone to generate resistance. This notion has led to the search for new pleiotropic agents that efficiency and specifically eliminate cancer cells. Such novel drugs are exemplified by inhibitors of protein chaperons and by compounds that influence the chromatin status.

Hsp90 Chaperone Alterations in Cancer: Adaptive Response to a Malignant Lifestyle

The heat shock 90 KDa protein (HSP90) is the core ATPase of a stress-induced multi-component machinery. The HSP90 complex drives the correct folding of nascent client proteins, normally protecting them from aggregation or assisting their proteasome-mediated degradation if they become irreversibly damaged. Cancer cells are in a constant state of proteotoxic stress, both due to an adverse microenvironment (often featuring hypoxia and acidosis) and to cell-intrinsic alterations including conformationally aberrant oncoproteins, an unusually hight need for protein synthesis, elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), spontaneous DNA damage, DNA replicative stress and genomic instability. Thus, cancer cells require massive chaperone support to prevent oncoprotein degradation and sustain cell survival. Importantly, during oncogenesis, the normal function of HSP90 is ubiquitously subverted for the maintenance of malignant transformation. Cancer-specific alterations of the HSP90 system include a massive upregulation of HSP90 (in part through heat-shock factor 1-mediated gene transactivation) that temporally correlates with malignant transformation. Thus, HSP90 plays a key role in the conformational stabilization of mutant and overexpressed client oncoproteins and exerts powerful anti-apoptotic effects in cancer. For example, HSP90 protects mutant p53 proteins from the E3 ligase activity of endogenous MDM2 and CHIP, operating as a large protective ‘cage’ against p53 degradation. Several strategies exist to interfere with HSP90 function. Geldanamycin or its derivative 17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) operates by binding to the ATP-binding pocket of HSP90, thus inactivating its enzymatic functions. Importantly, tumor HSP90 has a 100-fold higher affinity for 17-AAG than HSP90 from normal tissues. This generates a therapeutic window for the use of HSP90 inhibitors in cancer therapy. Another compound, suberoylanilide-hydroxamic-acid (SAHA), interferes with the deacetylation of cytoplasmic HSP90 by blocking its obligatory positive regulator, the cytoplasmic histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6). Thus, SAHA operates by blocking HSP90 in an acetylated, enzymatically-inactive status. Generally, HDAC inhibitors interfere with transcriptional regulations due to their ability to promote histones acetylation. Among several HDACs, only HDAC6 is cytoplasmic and promotes the deacetylation of HSP90. HSP90 inhibitors have been shown to effectively kill tumor cells in several model systems. Second-generation HSP90 inhibitors and specific HDAC6 inhibitors have recently been developed, and have been associated with durable clinical responses in clinical trials., However, it is difficult to predict how individual tumors will respond. Answering this question or identifying predictive biomarkers will be facilitated by the identification of client proteins that are stabilized by HSP90 and are critically required for tumor cell survival and proliferation (Fig. 1). Oncoproteins such as HER2, AKT, RAS, p53 and EML4-ALK are among such clients.,

Figure 1. HSP90 inhibition by blockade of HSP90 ATP-binding site (with 17-AAG), and HSP90 de-acetylation (with SAHA). HSP90 stabilizes client proteins, shielding them from normal degradation (left). HSP90 inhibition by 17-AAG or SAHA dissociates this complex, leading to release and activation of E3-ubiquitin ligases that initiate the degradation of HSP90 client proteins (right).

Figure 1. HSP90 inhibition by blockade of HSP90 ATP-binding site (with 17-AAG), and HSP90 de-acetylation (with SAHA). HSP90 stabilizes client proteins, shielding them from normal degradation (left). HSP90 inhibition by 17-AAG or SAHA dissociates this complex, leading to release and activation of E3-ubiquitin ligases that initiate the degradation of HSP90 client proteins (right). Recently, our group identified macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) as another important protein stabilized by HSP90 in cancer. We observed elevated MIF levels in the ErbB2 mouse model of breast cancer. Upon HSP90 inhibition by the systemic administration of 17-AAG, MIF degradation was initiated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP and tumor progression was strongly impaired. In line with these results, 17-AAG-induced apoptosis and the growth defects of cancer cells treated with 17-AAG in vivo were significantly rescued by excess ectopic MIF. Likewise, in Mif−/− mice, the development of ErbB2 breast tumors was delayed, and these mice survived longer than their Mif+/+ counterparts. Altogether, these observations indicate that HSP90 stabilizes MIF in cancer cells, in turn constituting an essential contributor to ErbB2-driven tumor progression. Surprisingly, at least in this model, the HSP90 inhibitor 17-AAG acted largely through the destabilizion of MIF (rather than ErbB2), and this function was crucial for its anti-tumor activity. Why does elevated MIF promote tumor progression? MIF, a pleiotropic tumor stimulator, influences several signaling pathways., For example, MIF acts as a pro-inflammatory/pro-angiogenic cytokine in an autocrine and paracrine fashion, inducing the stabilization of HIF1α and the secretion of multiple interleukins. MIF also binds to the CD74 cell surface receptor and activates the mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in tumor and stromal cells. Furthermore, high MIF levels accumulate intracellularly in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Finally, MIF interferes with the oncosuppressive functions of p53 and pRB., Thus, MIF degradation as a result of HSP90 inhibition should abolish most, if not all, MIF-dependent tumor-promoting activities. The value of MIF as predictor of the clinical efficacy of HSP90 inhibitors may depend on tumor type and on the specific HSP90 inhibitor. Additional HSP90 clients may constitute predictive biomarkers similar to MIF. Thus, identifying critical client proteins of HSP90 in a given cancer may allow for the prediction of the clinical efficacy of treatments based on HSP90 inhibitors. This would result in the selective and individualized use of a pleiotropic drug, potentially translating a “dirty drug” in clean clinical responses.
  9 in total

Review 1.  HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights.

Authors:  Mikko Taipale; Daniel F Jarosz; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a probable link between inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Richard Bucala; Seamas C Donnelly
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor MIF interferes with the Rb-E2F pathway.

Authors:  Oleksi Petrenko; Ute M Moll
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer.

Authors:  Jane Trepel; Mehdi Mollapour; Giuseppe Giaccone; Len Neckers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  HSP90 inhibition is effective in breast cancer: a phase II trial of tanespimycin (17-AAG) plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing on trastuzumab.

Authors:  Shanu Modi; Alison Stopeck; Hannah Linden; David Solit; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Neal Rosen; Gabriella D'Andrea; Maura Dickler; Mary E Moynahan; Steven Sugarman; Weining Ma; Sujata Patil; Larry Norton; Alison L Hannah; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Functional inactivation of endogenous MDM2 and CHIP by HSP90 causes aberrant stabilization of mutant p53 in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Dun Li; Natalia D Marchenko; Ramona Schulz; Victoria Fischer; Talia Velasco-Hernandez; Flaminia Talos; Ute M Moll
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.852

7.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor deficiency is associated with altered cell growth and reduced susceptibility to Ras-mediated transformation.

Authors:  Oleksi Petrenko; Gunter Fingerle-Rowson; Tina Peng; Robert A Mitchell; Christine N Metz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor coordinates DNA damage response with the proteasomal control of the cell cycle.

Authors:  Alice Nemajerova; Ute M Moll; Oleksi Petrenko; Günter Fingerle-Rowson
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Inhibiting the HSP90 chaperone destabilizes macrophage migration inhibitory factor and thereby inhibits breast tumor progression.

Authors:  Ramona Schulz; Natalia D Marchenko; Lena Holembowski; Günter Fingerle-Rowson; Marina Pesic; Lars Zender; Matthias Dobbelstein; Ute M Moll
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 14.307

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  The significance of heat shock proteins in breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Sevil Oskay Halacli; Burcin Halacli; Kadri Altundag
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Hsp90 activator Aha1 drives production of pathological tau aggregates.

Authors:  Lindsey B Shelton; Jeremy D Baker; Dali Zheng; Leia E Sullivan; Parth K Solanki; Jack M Webster; Zheying Sun; Jonathan J Sabbagh; Bryce A Nordhues; John Koren; Suman Ghosh; Brian S J Blagg; Laura J Blair; Chad A Dickey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  HER2/ErbB2 activates HSF1 and thereby controls HSP90 clients including MIF in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Authors:  R Schulz; F Streller; A H Scheel; J Rüschoff; M-C Reinert; M Dobbelstein; N D Marchenko; U M Moll
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 8.469

4.  Hsp90-stabilized MIF supports tumor progression via macrophage recruitment and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luisa Klemke; Tiago De Oliveira; Daria Witt; Nadine Winkler; Hanibal Bohnenberger; Richard Bucala; Lena-Christin Conradi; Ramona Schulz-Heddergott
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A expression levels determine the response of colorectal cancer cells to the heat shock protein 90 inhibitor ganetespib.

Authors:  H Landmann; D A Proia; S He; L S Ogawa; F Kramer; T Beißbarth; M Grade; J Gaedcke; M Ghadimi; U Moll; M Dobbelstein
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 6.  A Decade of Boon or Burden: What Has the CHIP Ever Done for Cellular Protein Quality Control Mechanism Implicated in Neurodegeneration and Aging?

Authors:  Vibhuti Joshi; Ayeman Amanullah; Arun Upadhyay; Ribhav Mishra; Amit Kumar; Amit Mishra
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.