Literature DB >> 21478269

Functional inactivation of endogenous MDM2 and CHIP by HSP90 causes aberrant stabilization of mutant p53 in human cancer cells.

Dun Li1, Natalia D Marchenko, Ramona Schulz, Victoria Fischer, Talia Velasco-Hernandez, Flaminia Talos, Ute M Moll.   

Abstract

The tight control of wild-type p53 by mainly MDM2 in normal cells is permanently lost in tumors harboring mutant p53, which exhibit dramatic constitutive p53 hyperstabilization that far exceeds that of wild-type p53 tumors. Importantly, mutant p53 hyperstabilization is critical for oncogenic gain of function of mutant p53 in vivo. Current insight into the mechanism of this dysregulation is fragmentary and largely derived from ectopically constructed cell systems. Importantly, mutant p53 knock-in mice established that normal mutant p53 tissues have sufficient enzymatic reserves in MDM2 and other E3 ligases to maintain full control of mutant p53. We find that in human cancer cells, endogenous mutant p53, despite its ability to interact with MDM2, suffers from a profound lack of ubiquitination as the root of its degradation defect. In contrast to wild-type p53, the many mutant p53 proteins which are conformationally aberrant are engaged in complexes with the HSP90 chaperone machinery to prevent its aggregation. In contrast to wild-type p53 cancer cells, we show that in mutant p53 cancer cells, this HSP90 interaction blocks the endogenous MDM2 and CHIP (carboxy-terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein) E3 ligase activity. Interference with HSP90 either by RNA interference against HSF1, the transcriptional regulator of the HSP90 pathway, or by direct knockdown of Hsp90 protein or by pharmacologic inhibition of Hsp90 activity with 17AAG (17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin) destroys the complex, liberates mutant p53, and reactivates endogenous MDM2 and CHIP to degrade mutant p53. Of note, 17AAG induces a stronger viability loss in mutant p53 than in wild-type p53 cancer cells. Our data support the rationale that suppression of mutant p53 levels in vivo in established cancers might achieve clinically significant effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21478269      PMCID: PMC3097033          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  35 in total

1.  The chaperone-associated ubiquitin ligase CHIP is able to target p53 for proteasomal degradation.

Authors:  Claudia Esser; Martin Scheffner; Jörg Höhfeld
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The physical association of multiple molecular chaperone proteins with mutant p53 is altered by geldanamycin, an hsp90-binding agent.

Authors:  L Whitesell; P D Sutphin; E J Pulcini; J D Martinez; P H Cook
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  p53 protein stability in tumour cells is not determined by mutation but is dependent on Mdm2 binding.

Authors:  C A Midgley; D P Lane
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-09-04       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Geldanamycin-stimulated destabilization of mutated p53 is mediated by the proteasome in vivo.

Authors:  L Whitesell; P Sutphin; W G An; T Schulte; M V Blagosklonny; L Neckers
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  mdm-2 inhibits the G1 arrest and apoptosis functions of the p53 tumor suppressor protein.

Authors:  J Chen; X Wu; J Lin; A J Levine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Kenneth P Olive; David A Tuveson; Zachary C Ruhe; Bob Yin; Nicholas A Willis; Roderick T Bronson; Denise Crowley; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Gene A Lang; Tomoo Iwakuma; Young-Ah Suh; Geng Liu; V Ashutosh Rao; John M Parant; Yasmine A Valentin-Vega; Tamara Terzian; Lisa C Caldwell; Louise C Strong; Adel K El-Naggar; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The alternative product from the human CDKN2A locus, p14(ARF), participates in a regulatory feedback loop with p53 and MDM2.

Authors:  F J Stott; S Bates; M C James; B B McConnell; M Starborg; S Brookes; I Palmero; K Ryan; E Hara; K H Vousden; G Peters
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A high-affinity conformation of Hsp90 confers tumour selectivity on Hsp90 inhibitors.

Authors:  Adeela Kamal; Lia Thao; John Sensintaffar; Lin Zhang; Marcus F Boehm; Lawrence C Fritz; Francis J Burrows
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Functional and physical interactions of the ARF tumor suppressor with p53 and Mdm2.

Authors:  T Kamijo; J D Weber; G Zambetti; F Zindy; M F Roussel; C J Sherr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  127 in total

1.  SAHA shows preferential cytotoxicity in mutant p53 cancer cells by destabilizing mutant p53 through inhibition of the HDAC6-Hsp90 chaperone axis.

Authors:  D Li; N D Marchenko; U M Moll
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  A nuclear phosphoinositide kinase complex regulates p53.

Authors:  Suyong Choi; Mo Chen; Vincent L Cryns; Richard A Anderson
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  It Takes 15 to Tango: Making Sense of the Many Ubiquitin Ligases of p53.

Authors:  Ian M Love; Steven R Grossman
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-03

4.  Small-Molecule NSC59984 Restores p53 Pathway Signaling and Antitumor Effects against Colorectal Cancer via p73 Activation and Degradation of Mutant p53.

Authors:  Shengliang Zhang; Lanlan Zhou; Bo Hong; A Pieter J van den Heuvel; Varun V Prabhu; Noel A Warfel; Christina Leah B Kline; David T Dicker; Levy Kopelovich; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  TP53 promoter methylation in primary glioblastoma: relationship with TP53 mRNA and protein expression and mutation status.

Authors:  Dorota Jesionek-Kupnicka; Malgorzata Szybka; Beata Malachowska; Wojciech Fendler; Piotr Potemski; Sylwester Piaskowski; Dariusz Jaskolski; Wielislaw Papierz; Wieslaw Skowronski; Waldemar Och; Radzislaw Kordek; Izabela Zawlik
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 6.  Interplay between HSF1 and p53 signaling pathways in cancer initiation and progression: non-oncogene and oncogene addiction.

Authors:  Agnieszka Toma-Jonik; Natalia Vydra; Patryk Janus; Wiesława Widłak
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 7.  The stiff RhoAd from mevalonate to mutant p53.

Authors:  Giovanni Sorrentino; Fiamma Mantovani; Giannino Del Sal
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Mutant p53 Sequestration of the MDM2 Acidic Domain Inhibits E3 Ligase Activity.

Authors:  Leixiang Yang; Tanjing Song; Qian Cheng; Lihong Chen; Jiandong Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Targeting tumour-supportive cellular machineries in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Matthias Dobbelstein; Ute Moll
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 10.  Chemical metabolic inhibitors for the treatment of blood-borne cancers.

Authors:  Martin Villalba; Nuria Lopez-Royuela; Ewelina Krzywinska; Moeez G Rathore; Robert A Hipskind; Houda Haouas; Nerea Allende-Vega
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.