Literature DB >> 23242380

Far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Atsuo Nakamae1, Mitsuo Ochi, Nobuo Adachi, Masataka Deie, Tomoyuki Nakasa, Goki Kamei, Atsushi Okuhara, Takuya Niimoto, Shingo Ohkawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the relationship between knee flexion angle and femoral tunnel length, as well as the exit points of guidewires, when using a far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
METHODS: Using the far anteromedial portal technique in 8 cadaveric knees, femoral tunnel drilling for the posterolateral bundle was performed at 3 knee flexion angles: 90°, 110° and 130°. We measured the femoral tunnel length and the distances from each guidewire to the closest relevant structures.
RESULTS: The mean tunnel length at 90° knee flexion (25.8 ± 1.8 mm) was significantly shorter than the length at 110° and 130° knee flexion (32.1 ± 2.6 and 33.1 ± 2.5 mm, respectively). The average distance between the exit point of the guidewire and the posterior articular cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle was the shortest at 90° knee flexion (3.3 ± 2.2 mm). The distance between the guidewire and the centre of the origin of the lateral collateral ligament was the shortest at 130° knee flexion (8.0 ± 1.8 mm). The guidewires penetrated the origin of the lateral gastrocnemius tendon in 2 cases at 110° knee flexion and in 1 case each at 90° and 130° knee flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: When using the far anteromedial portal technique, more than 110° knee flexion is desirable to achieve ideal femoral tunnel length and avoid articular cartilage injury. In addition, the risk of damage to the origin of the lateral collateral ligament increases when the knee flexion angle increases to 130°. A knee flexion angle between 110° and 120° was recommended when using the far anteromedial portal technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23242380     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2346-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Clinical comparisons between the transtibial technique and the far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Atsuo Nakamae; Mitsuo Ochi; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Tomoyuki Nakasa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Comparing stability of different single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: a cadaveric study using navigation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; James E Voos; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Daniel Choi; Volker Stueber; Daniel Kendoff; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew G Silver; Scott G Kaar; Margaret K Grisell; Jeffrey M Reagan; Lutul D Farrow
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz; John Konicek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  M Otani; M Nozaki; M Kobayashi; H Goto; K Tawada; Y Waguri-Nagaya; H Okamoto; H Iguchi; N Watanabe; T Otsuka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Potential risk of cartilage damage in double bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle and portal location on the femoral PL bundle tunnel.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Ann-Kristin Haase; Freddie H Fu; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Koji Nishimoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kiyonori Mizuno; Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Seiji Kubo; Masayoshi Yagi; Motoi Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  How to avoid the risk of intraoperative cartilage damage in anatomic four tunnel double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Ioannis S Benetos; Nico Sartory; Zhenming He; Nawid Hariri; Hans H Pässler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Paulo H Araujo; Carola F van Eck; Jeffrey A Macalena; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  4 in total

1.  Influences of knee flexion angle and portal position on the location of femoral tunnel outlet in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Kanji Osaki; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Hirokazu Matsubara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Does flexible tunnel drilling affect the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Bart Muller; Marcus Hofbauer; Akere Atte; C Niek van Dijk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The Relationship Between Lateral Femoral Anatomic Structures and the Femoral Tunnel Outlet in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Transportal Technique: A 3-Dimensional Simulation Analysis.

Authors:  Kwangho Chung; Chong Hyuk Choi; Sung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Jae Kim; Woosung Do; Min Jung
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-28

4.  Effect of Tunnel Drilling Portal on Femoral Tunnel Entry Aperture's Location in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdul Ghaffar; Rajesh Arora; Atul Agrawal; Arvind Kumar; Rajesh Maheshwari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.