Literature DB >> 20511037

Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Andrew G Silver1, Scott G Kaar, Margaret K Grisell, Jeffrey M Reagan, Lutul D Farrow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in femoral tunnel length and distance to the lateral anatomic structures when using standard and flexible guide pins for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel drilling through a medial portal.
METHODS: Using a medial arthroscopic portal in 10 cadaveric knees, we sequentially drilled straight and flexible guide pins into the center of the ACL femoral footprint using the same starting point. We recorded the interosseous length and distances to the peroneal nerve and the femoral origin of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) for each pin.
RESULTS: The mean interosseous length was 43.5 mm for the flexible pin and 37.1 mm for the straight pin (P = .01). The mean distance to the peroneal nerve was 42.3 mm for the flexible pin and 37.8 mm for the straight pin (P = .33). The mean distance to the femoral origin of the LCL was 26.1 mm for the flexible pin and 13.4 mm for the straight pin (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of commercially available flexible reamers and 42 degrees femoral guides results in longer femoral interosseous tunnel length than can be achieved with a straight guide pin. Femoral interosseous length consistently of 40 mm can be achieved with this technique and cannot be replicated with a rigid straight pin. This is advantageous for femoral tunnel drilling in an anatomic ACL reconstruction that uses suspensory fixation devices. There is minimal risk to the peroneal nerve and the femoral origin of the LCL unless lateral femoral wall blowout occurs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Flexible pins allow longer femoral tunnels and safer distances from the LCL by use of a medial portal technique. Copyright (c) 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20511037     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  Effect of ACL reconstruction tunnels on stress in the distal femur.

Authors:  P Smolinski; M O'Farrell; K Bell; L Gilbertson; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Reply to: comments on Alentorn-Geli et al.: anteromedial portal (AMP) versus transtibial (TT) drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Gonzalo Samitier; Pedro Alvarez; Gilbert Steinbacher; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Sven Scheffler; Tim Spalding; Jeremy Brown; Paul M Sutton
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-06

4.  Far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Atsuo Nakamae; Mitsuo Ochi; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Tomoyuki Nakasa; Goki Kamei; Atsushi Okuhara; Takuya Niimoto; Shingo Ohkawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Does flexible tunnel drilling affect the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Bart Muller; Marcus Hofbauer; Akere Atte; C Niek van Dijk; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a flexible reamer system and 70° arthroscope.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Rasmussen; Kyle P Lavery; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-08-30

7.  Tibia rotational technique to drill femoral bone tunnel in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Genya Mitani; Tomonori Takagaki; Kosuke Hamahashi; Nagatoshi Kaneshiro; Kenji Serigano; Takashi Maeda; Yutaka Nakamura; Joji Mochida
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-08-04

8.  In Vivo Analysis of Dynamic Graft Bending Angle in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees During Downward Running and Level Walking: Comparison of Flexible and Rigid Drills for Transportal Technique.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Vani Sundaram; Eric Thorhauer; Tom Gale; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Comparison of femoral tunnel length between transportal and retrograde reaming outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jae Gyoon Kim; Joon Ho Wang; Jin Hwan Ahn; Hak Jun Kim; Hong Chul Lim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Flexible Reamer System: Technique and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Judd Fitzgerald; Paul Saluan; Dustin L Richter; Nathan Huff; Robert C Schenck
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.