| Literature DB >> 23241359 |
Rasha Babiker1, Tarig H Merghani, Khalifa Elmusharaf, Rehab M Badi, Florian Lang, Amal M Saeed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gum Arabic (acacia Senegal) is a complex polysaccharide indigestible to both humans and animals. It has been considered as a safe dietary fiber by the United States, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since the 1970s. Although its effects were extensively studied in animals, there is paucity of data regarding its quantified use in humans. This study was conducted to determine effects of regular Gum Arabic (GA) ingestion on body mass index and body fat percentage among healthy adult females.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23241359 PMCID: PMC3570285 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Figure 1Follow of participants throughout the intervention.
Characteristics of cases in the study and control groups
| Age (years) | Study group | 17 | 31 | 19.37 | 1.97 | 0.670 |
| Control group | 18 | 35 | 19.53 | 2.25 | ||
| Height (m) | Study group | 1.50 | 1.85 | 1.63 | 0.064 | 0.620 |
| Control group | 1.53 | 1.73 | 1.62 | 0.057 | ||
| Weight (kg) | Study group | 54.30 | 121.20 | 72.30 | 13.26 | 0.054 |
| Control group | 46.30 | 95.50 | 68.01 | 10.78 | ||
| BMI (kg/ m2) | Study group | 17.53 | 51.10 | 27.31 | 5.42 | 0.076 |
| Control group | 17.22 | 34.66 | 25.78 | 3.85 | ||
| Body fat % | Study group | 11.70 | 32.00 | 19.45 | 4.24 | 0.14 |
| Control group | 9.50 | 26.90 | 18.31 | 4.14 | ||
The Percent changes on Body Weight among Study and Control groups
| (study group) | Before | 72.25 | 1.24 | - 0.70, 3.18 | 1.94 |
| After | 71.43 | | | ||
| (control group) | Before | 68.00 | 1.35 | ||
| After | 68.19 | ||||
Figure 2Reduction in BMI among study and control group.
Figure 3Reduction in fat % among study and control groups.
Body mass index and body fat percent changes among study and controls
| BMI (study group) | Before | 17.53 | 51.10 | 27.31 | 5.42 | −0.32 | 0.0001 |
| After | 17.36 | 53.04 | 26.99 | 5.54 | |||
| BMI (control group) | Before | 17.22 | 34.66 | 25.78 | 3.85 | 0.07 | 0.132 |
| After | 17.40 | 34.62 | 25.85 | 3.80 | |||
| Fat % (study group) | Before | 11.70 | 32.00 | 19.45 | 4.24 | −2.18 | 0.000 |
| After | 9.49 | 30.50 | 17.26 | 4.28 | |||
| Fat % (control group) | Before | 9.50 | 26.90 | 18.31 | 4.14 | 0.82 | 0.010 |
| After | 10.53 | 25.90 | 19.13 | 4.06 | |||
Side effects of intervention among study and controls
| Nausea | Yes | 49 | 81.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.000 |
| No | 11 | 18.3% | 60 | 100.0% | ||
| Diarrhea | Yes | 54 | 90.0% | 11 | 18.3% | 0.000 |
| No | 6 | 10.0% | 49 | 81.7% | | |
| Unfavourable oral viscous sensation | Yes | 60 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.000 |
| No | 0 | 0.0% | 60 | 100.0% | | |
| Bloating abdomen | Yes | 9 | 15.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.002 |
| No | 51 | 85.0% | 60 | 100.0% | ||