S Manodoro1,2, M Endo1,3, P Uvin3, M Albersen3, J Vláčil1,3, A Engels1, B Schmidt4, D De Ridder3,5, A Feola1,3, J Deprest1,3,5. 1. Centre for Surgical Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. 3. Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 4. European Competence Center of Healthcare Engineering, Hemmingen, Germany. 5. Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of graft-related complications (GRCs) and biomechanical properties of meshes implanted vaginally and abdominally. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: Centre for Surgical Technologies, Medical Faculty, KU Leuven, Belgium. POPULATION: Twenty adult parous Texel ewes. METHODS: Sheep were implanted with Gynemesh M, a 28-g/m² polypropylene mesh reinforced with polyglecaprone fibres, under general anaesthesia. Dissection into the rectovaginal septum was performed to accommodate a flat 50 × 50 mm (n = 10) or 35 × 35 mm (n = 10) mesh, which was sutured to the underlying tissues. A 50 × 50 mm mesh was laid over a primarily sutured, full-thickness, 40-mm longitudinal abdominal wall incision. Sacrifice was at 60 days (n = 10) or 90 days (n = 5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of exposure, the degree of contraction and examination of the biomechanical properties of explants with a minimum radius of 32 mm via biaxial tensiometry. RESULTS: Insertion of a 50 × 50 mm mesh led to exposures in 30% (3/10) of cases, and the average contraction rate was 52 ± 14%. In the 35 × 35 mm implants, there were no exposures, and the contraction rate was 25 ± 26.3%. Vaginal explants with no GRCs and of sufficient size had biomechanical properties that were comparable with those of abdominal explants. CONCLUSION: Vaginal mesh insertion is associated with GRCs, such as exposure and contraction. Although other factors probably play a role, this study illustrates that mesh size may also induce these complications. In a vaginal surgery model, clinically occurring GRCs can be reproduced. In addition, biomechanics of uncomplicated vaginal explants are comparable with those measured on abdominal explants.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of graft-related complications (GRCs) and biomechanical properties of meshes implanted vaginally and abdominally. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: Centre for Surgical Technologies, Medical Faculty, KU Leuven, Belgium. POPULATION: Twenty adult parous Texel ewes. METHODS:Sheep were implanted with Gynemesh M, a 28-g/m² polypropylene mesh reinforced with polyglecaprone fibres, under general anaesthesia. Dissection into the rectovaginal septum was performed to accommodate a flat 50 × 50 mm (n = 10) or 35 × 35 mm (n = 10) mesh, which was sutured to the underlying tissues. A 50 × 50 mm mesh was laid over a primarily sutured, full-thickness, 40-mm longitudinal abdominal wall incision. Sacrifice was at 60 days (n = 10) or 90 days (n = 5). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of exposure, the degree of contraction and examination of the biomechanical properties of explants with a minimum radius of 32 mm via biaxial tensiometry. RESULTS: Insertion of a 50 × 50 mm mesh led to exposures in 30% (3/10) of cases, and the average contraction rate was 52 ± 14%. In the 35 × 35 mm implants, there were no exposures, and the contraction rate was 25 ± 26.3%. Vaginal explants with no GRCs and of sufficient size had biomechanical properties that were comparable with those of abdominal explants. CONCLUSION: Vaginal mesh insertion is associated with GRCs, such as exposure and contraction. Although other factors probably play a role, this study illustrates that mesh size may also induce these complications. In a vaginal surgery model, clinically occurring GRCs can be reproduced. In addition, biomechanics of uncomplicated vaginal explants are comparable with those measured on abdominal explants.
Authors: Masayuki Endo; Andrew Feola; Nikhil Sindhwani; Stefano Manodoro; Jarek Vlacil; Alexander Carl Engels; Filip Claus; Jan A Deprest Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432