Literature DB >> 23239694

Evaluation of anatomical landmark position differences between respiration-gated MRI and four-dimensional CT for radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

J I Yu1, J S Kim, H C Park, D H Lim, Y Y Han, H C Lim, S W Paik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the accuracy of position differences in anatomical landmarks in gated MRI and four-dimensional CT (4D-CT) fusion planning for radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: From April to December 2009, gated MR and planning 4D-CT images were obtained from 53 inoperable HCC patients accrued to this study. Gated MRI and planning 4D-CT were conducted on the same day. Manual image fusions were performed by matching the vertebral bodies. Liver volumes and three specific anatomical landmarks (portal vein conjunction, superior mesenteric artery bifurcation, and other noticeable points) were contoured from each modality. The points chosen nearest the centre of the four landmark points were compared to measure the accuracy of fusion.
RESULTS: The average distance differences (±standard deviation) of four validation points were 5.1 mm (±4.6 mm), 5.6 mm (±6.2 mm), 5.4 mm (±4.5 mm) and 5.1 mm (±4.8 mm). Patients who had ascites or pulmonary disease showed larger discrepancies. MRI-CT fusion discrepancy was significantly correlated with positive radiation response (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 5-mm anatomical landmark positional differences in all directions were found between gated MRI and 4D-CT fusion planning for HCC patients; the gap was larger in patients with ascites or pulmonary disease. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: There were discrepancies of approximately 5 mm in gated MRI-CT fusion planning for HCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23239694      PMCID: PMC3615390          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  21 in total

Review 1.  Conformal irradiation for hepatobiliary malignancies.

Authors:  L L Gunderson; M G Haddock; M L Foo; T Todoroki; D Nagorney
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) using image-based respiratory surrogate: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jing Cai; Zheng Chang; Zhiheng Wang; William Paul Segars; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Hepatic radiation toxicity: avoidance and amelioration.

Authors:  Chandan Guha; Brian D Kavanagh
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Respiratory kinematics of the upper abdominal organs: a quantitative study.

Authors:  H W Korin; R L Ehman; S J Riederer; J P Felmlee; R C Grimm
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based nonrigid registration of gated MR images.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Calvin R Maurer; Walter G O'Dell; Jianhui Zhong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Partial volume tolerance of the liver to radiation.

Authors:  Laura A Dawson; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.934

7.  Moving targets: detection and tracking of internal organ motion for treatment planning and patient set-up.

Authors:  Eike Rietzel; Stanley J Rosenthal; David P Gierga; Christopher G Willet; George T Y Chen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Mutual information based CT registration of the lung at exhale and inhale breathing states using thin-plate splines.

Authors:  Martha M Coselmon; James M Balter; Daniel L McShan; Marc L Kessler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Intrafractional tumor motion: lung and liver.

Authors:  Hiroki Shirato; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Kei Kitamura; Rikiya Onimura; Shinichi Shimizu
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.934

10.  Dose-response relationship in local radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hee Chul Park; Jinsil Seong; Kwang Hyub Han; Chae Yoon Chon; Young Myoung Moon; Chang Ok Suh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  7 in total

1.  A tool for validating MRI-guided strategies: a digital breathing CT/MRI phantom of the abdominal site.

Authors:  Chiara Paganelli; Paul Summers; Chiara Gianoli; Massimo Bellomi; Guido Baroni; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A feasibility study evaluating the relationship between dose and focal liver reaction in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for liver cancer based on intensity change of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Jung; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park; Do Hoon Lim; Youngyih Han
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 3.  Strategies to tackle the challenges of external beam radiotherapy for liver tumors.

Authors:  Michael I Lock; Jonathan Klein; Hans T Chung; Joseph M Herman; Edward Y Kim; William Small; Nina A Mayr; Simon S Lo
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-18

4.  Usefulness of Virtual Expiratory CT Images to Compensate for Respiratory Liver Motion in Ultrasound/CT Image Fusion: A Prospective Study in Patients with Focal Hepatic Lesions.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kang; Min Woo Lee; Dong Ik Cha; Hyun Jung Park; Jun Sung Park; Won Chul Bang; Seon Woo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Radiotherapy planning using MRI.

Authors:  Maria A Schmidt; Geoffrey S Payne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Clinical significance of radiotherapy before and/or during nivolumab treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong Il Yu; Su Jin Lee; Jeeyun Lee; Ho Yeong Lim; Seung Woon Paik; Gyu Sang Yoo; Changhoon Choi; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Structure guided deformable image registration for treatment planning CT and post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Primovist® (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Svetlana Kuznetsova; Petra Grendarova; Soumyajit Roy; Rishi Sinha; Kundan Thind; Nicolas Ploquin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.