Literature DB >> 23239690

Quantifying the potential for dose reduction with visual grading regression.

O Smedby1, M Fredrikson, J De Geer, L Borgen, M Sandborg.   

Abstract

Objectives To propose a method to study the effect of exposure settings on image quality and to estimate the potential for dose reduction when introducing dose-reducing measures. Methods Using the framework of visual grading regression (VGR), a log(mAs) term is included in the ordinal logistic regression equation, so that the effect of reducing the dose can be quantitatively related to the effect of adding post-processing. In the ordinal logistic regression, patient and observer identity are treated as random effects using generalised linear latent and mixed models. The potential dose reduction is then estimated from the regression coefficients. The method was applied in a single-image study of coronary CT angiography (CTA) to evaluate two-dimensional (2D) adaptive filters, and in an image-pair study of abdominal CT to evaluate 2D and three-dimensional (3D) adaptive filters. Results For five image quality criteria in coronary CTA, dose reductions of 16-26% were predicted when adding 2D filtering. Using five image quality criteria for abdominal CT, it was estimated that 2D filtering permits doses were reduced by 32-41%, and 3D filtering by 42-51%. Conclusions VGR including a log(mAs) term can be used for predictions of potential dose reduction that may be useful for guiding researchers in designing subsequent studies evaluating diagnostic value. With appropriate statistical analysis, it is possible to obtain direct numerical estimates of the dose-reducing potential of novel acquisition, reconstruction or post-processing techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23239690     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20110784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

1.  Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiography.

Authors:  M Sandborg; A Tingberg; D R Dance; B Lanhede; A Almén; G McVey; P Sund; S Kheddache; J Besjakov; S Mattsson; L G Månsson; G Alm Carlsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Ordered subset reconstruction for x-ray CT.

Authors:  F J Beekma; C Kamphuis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Iterative reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  G T Herman; A Lent
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression.

Authors:  R Brant
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images.

Authors:  K Ledenius; E Svensson; F Stålhammar; L-M Wiklund; A Thilander-Klang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA.

Authors:  Anders Tingberg; Magnus Båth; Markus Håkansson; Joakim Medin; Jack Besjakov; Michael Sandborg; Gudrun Alm-Carlsson; Sören Mattsson; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 7.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  M Båth; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Ordinal invariant measures for individual and group changes in ordered categorical data.

Authors:  E Svensson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Alvin C Silva; Holly J Lawder; Amy Hara; Jennifer Kujak; William Pavlicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  M Kachelriess; O Watzke; W A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Can image enhancement allow radiation dose to be reduced whilst maintaining the perceived diagnostic image quality required for coronary angiography?

Authors:  Anuja Joshi; Amber J Gislason-Lee; Claire Keeble; Uduvil M Sivananthan; Andrew G Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The Medical Image Perception Society XIV conference.

Authors:  E A Krupinski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Subcutaneous tissue thickness is an independent predictor of image noise in cardiac CT.

Authors:  Henrique Lane Staniak; Rodolfo Sharovsky; Alexandre Costa Pereira; Cláudio Campi de Castro; Isabela M Benseñor; Paulo A Lotufo; Márcio Sommer Bittencourt
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Regression models for analyzing radiological visual grading studies--an empirical comparison.

Authors:  S Ehsan Saffari; Áskell Löve; Mats Fredrikson; Örjan Smedby
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Assessment of image quality in abdominal CT: potential dose reduction with model-based iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Bharti Kataria; Jonas Nilsson Althén; Örjan Smedby; Anders Persson; Hannibal Sökjer; Michael Sandborg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.