Literature DB >> 23239305

Optimizing working space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effects of intra-abdominal pressure.

John Vlot1, Rene Wijnen, Robert Jan Stolker, Klaas Bax.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several factors may affect volume and dimensions of the working space in laparoscopic surgery. The precise impact of these factors has not been well studied. In a porcine model, we used computed tomographic (CT) scanning for measuring working space volume and distances. In a first series of experiments, we studied the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and working space.
METHODS: Eleven 20 kg pigs were studied under standardized anesthesia and volume-controlled ventilation. Cardiorespiratory parameters were monitored continuously, and blood gas samples were taken at different IAP levels. Respiratory rate was increased when ETCO₂ exceeded 7 kPa. Breath-hold CT scans were made at IAP levels of 0, 5, 10, and 15 mmHg. Insufflator volumes were compared to CT-measured volumes. Maximum dimensions of pneumoperitoneum were measured on reconstructed CT images.
RESULTS: Respiratory rate had to be increased in three animals. Mild hypercapnia and acidosis occurred at 15 mmHg IAP. Peak inspiratory pressure rose significantly at 10 and 15 mmHg. CT-measured volume increased relatively by 93 % from 5 to 10 mmHg IAP and by 19 % from 10 to 15 mmHg IAP. Comparing CT volumes to insufflator volumes gave a bias of 76 mL. The limits of agreement were -0.31 to +0.47, a range of 790 mL. The internal anteroposterior diameter increased by 18 % by increasing IAP from 5 to 10 mmHg and by 5 % by increasing IAP from 10 to 15 mmHg. At 15 mmHg, the total relative increase of the pubis-diaphragm distance was only 6 %. Abdominal width did not increase.
CONCLUSIONS: CT allows for precise calculation of the actual CO₂ pneumoperitoneum volume, whereas the volume of CO₂ released by the insufflator does not. Increasing IAP up to 10 mmHg achieved most gain in volume and in internal anteroposterior diameter. At an IAP of 10 mmHg, higher peak inspiratory pressure was significantly elevated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239305     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2654-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques.

Authors:  T Frede; C Stock; C Renner; Z Budair; Y Abdel-Salam; J Rassweiler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Koivusalo; L Lindgren
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Effect of CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on ventilation-perfusion relationships during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Andersson; L Lagerstrand; A Thörne; A Sollevi; L-A Brodin; S Odeberg-Wernerman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation.

Authors:  P Cadi; T Guenoun; D Journois; J-M Chevallier; J-L Diehl; D Safran
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Changes in splanchnic blood flow and cardiovascular effects following peritoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Y Ishizaki; Y Bandai; K Shimomura; H Abe; Y Ohtomo; Y Idezuki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres.

Authors:  A M Gordon; A F Huxley; F J Julian
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Elasticity of the living abdominal wall in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Chengli Song; Afshin Alijani; Tim Frank; George Hanna; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 9.  Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Kumarakrishnan Samraj; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide during gynecologic laparoscopy: spontaneous versus controlled ventilation.

Authors:  M Vegfors; L Engborg; A Gupta; C Lennmarken
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.452

View more
  10 in total

1.  Optimizing working space in laparoscopy: CT-measurement of the effect of neuromuscular blockade and its reversal in a porcine model.

Authors:  John Vlot; Patricia A Specht; René M H Wijnen; Joost van Rosmalen; Egbert G Mik; Klaas M A Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study.

Authors:  Oscar Diaz-Cambronero; Blas Flor Lorente; Guido Mazzinari; Maria Vila Montañes; Nuria García Gregorio; Daniel Robles Hernandez; Luis Enrique Olmedilla Arnal; Maria Pilar Argente Navarro; Marcus J Schultz; Carlos L Errando
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Optimizing working-space in laparoscopy: measuring the effect of mechanical bowel preparation in a porcine model.

Authors:  John Vlot; Juliette C Slieker; René Wijnen; Johan F Lange; Klaas N M A Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Optimizing working space in laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effect of pre-stretching of the abdominal wall in a porcine model.

Authors:  John Vlot; René Wijnen; Robert Jan Stolker; Klaas N Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted cryptorchidectomy in 2 Vietnamese pot-bellied pigs (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Nadia Rosanova; Ameet Singh; Nicola Cribb
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Patient-Related Factors Predicting Workspace Conditions during Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Paola Aceto; Cristina Modesti; Teresa Sacco; Roberto De Cicco; Valter Perilli; Marco Raffaelli; Carlo Lai; Liliana Sollazzi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Impact of valve-less vs. standard insufflation on pneumoperitoneum volume, inflammation, and peritoneal physiology in a laparoscopic sigmoid resection experimental model.

Authors:  Michele Diana; Eric Noll; Andras Legnèr; Seong-Ho Kong; Yu-Yin Liu; Luigi Schiraldi; Francesco Marchegiani; Jordan Bano; Bernard Geny; Anne-Laure Charles; Bernard Dallemagne; Véronique Lindner; Didier Mutter; Pierre Diemunsch; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The Intraocular Pressure under Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade during Low-Pressure Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Young-Chul Yoo; Na Young Kim; Seokyung Shin; Young Deuk Choi; Jung Hwa Hong; Chan Yun Kim; HeeJoon Park; Sun-Joon Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Abdominal Compliance and Laparoscopy: A Review.

Authors:  Douglas E Ott
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  The effect of different levels of pneumoperitoneum pressures on regional cerebral oxygenation during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Authors:  Arzu Karaveli; Ali Sait Kavaklı; Murat Özçelik; Mutlu Ateş; Kerem İnanoğlu; Sadık Özmen
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.