PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to survey the current CT protocols used by members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI) to evaluate patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). METHODS: A questionnaire was e-mailed to 173 ESTI members. The survey focussed on CT acquisition and reconstruction techniques. In particular, questions referred to the use of discontinuous HRCT or volume CT protocols, the acquisition of additional acquisitions in expiration or in the prone position, and methods of radiation dose reduction and on reconstruction algorithms. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 37 %. Eighty-five percent of the respondents used either volume CT alone or in combination with discontinuous HRCT. Forty-five percent of the respondents adapt their CT protocols to the patient's weight and/or age. Expiratory CT or CT in the prone position was performed by 58 % and 59 % of the respondents, respectively. The number of reconstructed series ranged from two to eight. CONCLUSION: Our survey showed that radiologists with a special interest and experience in chest radiology use a variety of CT protocols for the evaluation of ILD. There is a clear preference for volumetric scans and a strong tendency to use the 3D information. KEY POINTS: • Experienced thoracic radiologists use various CT protocols for evaluating interstitial lung diseases. • Most workers prefer volumetric CT acquisitions, making use of the 3D information • More attention to reducing the radiation dose appears to be needed.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to survey the current CT protocols used by members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI) to evaluate patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). METHODS: A questionnaire was e-mailed to 173 ESTI members. The survey focussed on CT acquisition and reconstruction techniques. In particular, questions referred to the use of discontinuous HRCT or volume CT protocols, the acquisition of additional acquisitions in expiration or in the prone position, and methods of radiation dose reduction and on reconstruction algorithms. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 37 %. Eighty-five percent of the respondents used either volume CT alone or in combination with discontinuous HRCT. Forty-five percent of the respondents adapt their CT protocols to the patient's weight and/or age. Expiratory CT or CT in the prone position was performed by 58 % and 59 % of the respondents, respectively. The number of reconstructed series ranged from two to eight. CONCLUSION: Our survey showed that radiologists with a special interest and experience in chest radiology use a variety of CT protocols for the evaluation of ILD. There is a clear preference for volumetric scans and a strong tendency to use the 3D information. KEY POINTS: • Experienced thoracic radiologists use various CT protocols for evaluating interstitial lung diseases. • Most workers prefer volumetric CT acquisitions, making use of the 3D information • More attention to reducing the radiation dose appears to be needed.
Authors: Stephan Baumueller; Anna Winklehner; Christoph Karlo; Robert Goetti; Thomas Flohr; Erich W Russi; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andreas Christe; Margaret C Lin; Andrew C Yen; Rich L Hallett; Kingshuk Roychoudhury; Florian Schmitzberger; Dominik Fleischmann; Ann N Leung; Geoffrey D Rubin; Geoffry D Rubin; Peter Vock; Justus E Roos Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Sharon W Kwan; Bernhard L Partik; Steven E Zinck; Frandics P Chan; Stephen T Kee; Ann N Leung; Martin Voracek; Geoffrey D Rubin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jonas Rydberg; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran; Robert D Tarver; Mark S Frank; Dewey J Conces; Robert H Choplin Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: B Bradley; H M Branley; J J Egan; M S Greaves; D M Hansell; N K Harrison; N Hirani; R Hubbard; F Lake; A B Millar; W A H Wallace; A U Wells; M K Whyte; M L Wilsher Journal: Thorax Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Matthew D Gilman; Jiang Hsieh; Homer H Pien; Subba R Digumarthy; Jo-Anne O Shepard Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Beth Wallace; Suzanne Kafaja; Daniel E Furst; Veronica J Berrocal; Peter A Merkel; James R Seibold; Maureen D Mayes; Dinesh Khanna Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Guy N Rutty; Mike J P Biggs; Alison Brough; Claire Robinson; Reena Mistry; Jasmin Amoroso; Aparna Deshpande; Bruno Morgan Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Maria T A Buzan; Monika Eichinger; Michael Kreuter; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Felix J Herth; Arne Warth; Carmen Monica Pop; Claus Peter Heussel; Julien Dinkel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; U Joseph Schoepf; Damiano Caruso; Maria Cristina Inserra; Ibrahim Yel; Simon S Martin; Andreas M Bucher; Lukas Lenga; Danilo Caudo; Teresa Schreckenbach; Niklas Schoell; Christian Huegel; Jan Stratmann; Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera; Daniel E Rachovitsky-Duarte; Andrea Laghi; Domenico De Santis; Silvio Mazziotti; Tommaso D'Angelo; Moritz H Albrecht Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 4.531