PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential usefulness of intratumoural tracer uptake heterogeneity on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as compared to a cut-off maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for characterization of peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNSTs) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). METHODS: Fifty patients suffering from NF1 were examined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Intralesional tracer uptake was analysed qualitatively and semi-quantitatively by measuring the mean and maximum SUV. Uptake heterogeneity was graded qualitatively using a three-point scale and semi-quantitatively by calculating an SUV-based heterogeneity index (HISUV). Cohen's κ was used to determine inter- and intra-rater agreement. Histopathological evaluation and clinical as well as radiological follow-up examinations served as the reference standards. RESULTS: A highly significant correlation between the degree of intratumoural uptake heterogeneity on (18)F-FDG PET and malignant transformation of PNSTs was observed (p < 0.0001). Semi-quantitative HISUV was significantly higher in malignant PNSTs (MPNSTs) than in benign tumours (p = 0.0002). Both intralesional heterogeneity and SUVmax could be used to identify malignant tumours with a sensitivity of 100 %. Cohen's κ was 0.86 for inter-rater agreement and 0.88 for intra-rater agreement on heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: MPNSTs in patients with NF1 demonstrate considerable intratumoural uptake heterogeneity on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Assessment of tumour heterogeneity is highly reproducible. Both tumour heterogeneity and a cut-off SUVmax may be used to sensitively identify malignant PNSTs, but the specificity is higher for the latter. A combination of both methods leads to a non-significant improvement in diagnostic performance.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential usefulness of intratumoural tracer uptake heterogeneity on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as compared to a cut-off maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for characterization of peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNSTs) in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). METHODS: Fifty patients suffering from NF1 were examined by (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Intralesional tracer uptake was analysed qualitatively and semi-quantitatively by measuring the mean and maximum SUV. Uptake heterogeneity was graded qualitatively using a three-point scale and semi-quantitatively by calculating an SUV-based heterogeneity index (HISUV). Cohen's κ was used to determine inter- and intra-rater agreement. Histopathological evaluation and clinical as well as radiological follow-up examinations served as the reference standards. RESULTS: A highly significant correlation between the degree of intratumoural uptake heterogeneity on (18)F-FDG PET and malignant transformation of PNSTs was observed (p < 0.0001). Semi-quantitative HISUV was significantly higher in malignant PNSTs (MPNSTs) than in benign tumours (p = 0.0002). Both intralesional heterogeneity and SUVmax could be used to identify malignant tumours with a sensitivity of 100 %. Cohen's κ was 0.86 for inter-rater agreement and 0.88 for intra-rater agreement on heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: MPNSTs in patients with NF1 demonstrate considerable intratumoural uptake heterogeneity on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Assessment of tumour heterogeneity is highly reproducible. Both tumour heterogeneity and a cut-off SUVmax may be used to sensitively identify malignant PNSTs, but the specificity is higher for the latter. A combination of both methods leads to a non-significant improvement in diagnostic performance.
Authors: Janet F Eary; Jeanne M Link; Mark Muzi; Ernest U Conrad; David A Mankoff; Jedediah K White; Kenneth A Krohn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stephen R Grobmyer; John D Reith; Amir Shahlaee; Charles H Bush; Steven N Hochwald Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Ken Herrmann; Christian Meyer Zum Büschenfelde; Malik E Juweid; Mark Bischoff; Gerhard Glatting; Gregor Weirich; Peter Möller; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Klemens Scheidhauer; Tobias Dechow; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Sven N Reske Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J Uthoff; F A De Stefano; K Panzer; B W Darbro; T S Sato; R Khanna; D E Quelle; D K Meyerholz; J Weimer; J C Sieren Journal: J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.447
Authors: Lennart Well; Johannes Salamon; Michael G Kaul; Said Farschtschi; Jochen Herrmann; Karin I Geier; Christian Hagel; Maximilian Bockhorn; Peter Bannas; Gerhard Adam; Victor F Mautner; Thorsten Derlin Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Romain-David Seban; John S Nemer; Aurélien Marabelle; Randy Yeh; Eric Deutsch; Samy Ammari; Antoine Moya-Plana; Fatima-Zohra Mokrane; Robyn D Gartrell; Grace Finkel; Luke Barker; Amélie E Bigorgne; Lawrence H Schwartz; Yvonne Saenger; Caroline Robert; Laurent Dercle Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Abdel K Tahari; Krishna C Alluri; Harry Quon; Wayne Koch; Richard L Wahl; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Johannes Salamon; Simon Veldhoen; Ivayla Apostolova; Peter Bannas; Jin Yamamura; Jochen Herrmann; Reinhard E Friedrich; Gerhard Adam; Victor F Mautner; Thorsten Derlin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephen M Broski; Geoffrey B Johnson; Benjamin M Howe; Mark A Nathan; Doris E Wenger; Robert J Spinner; Kimberly K Amrami Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 2.199