Esther Mena1, Mehdi Taghipour, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Abhinav K Jha, Arman Rahmim, Lilja Solnes, Rathan M Subramaniam. 1. From the *Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; †Department of Radiology, ‡Department Clinical Sciences, §Advanced Imaging Research Center, and ∥Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity and quantitative FDG PET/CT imaging parameters for predicting patient outcomes in primary oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 105 patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were measured for the primary tumors and when available for the metastatic sites. Primary tumor intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity was calculated as the area under a cumulative SUV volume histograms curve (AUC-CSH). The median follow-up time was 35.4 months (range, 3-92 months). Outcome end point was event-free survival (EFS). Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients included, 19 patients relapsed and 11 deceased during the study period. AUC-CSH indexes were associated with EFS using PET gradient-based (P = 0.034) and 50% threshold (P = 0.02) segmentation methods, on multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using optimum cutoff of 16.7 SUVmax and 12.7 mL total MTV were significant predictors of EFS. Combining SUVmax and AUC-CSH index in 3 subgroups, patients with higher intratumoral heterogeneity and higher SUVmax were associated with worse outcome (log-rank, P = 0.026). Similarly, patients with higher intratumoral heterogeneity tumors and higher MTV had worse prognosis (log-rank, P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity using FDG PET was a prognostic factor for EFS in patients with primary HPV (+) OPSCC. The combined predictive effect of FDG avidity, metabolic tumor burden, and intratumoral heterogeneity provided prognostic survival information in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity and quantitative FDG PET/CT imaging parameters for predicting patient outcomes in primary oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 105 patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were measured for the primary tumors and when available for the metastatic sites. Primary tumor intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity was calculated as the area under a cumulative SUV volume histograms curve (AUC-CSH). The median follow-up time was 35.4 months (range, 3-92 months). Outcome end point was event-free survival (EFS). Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients included, 19 patients relapsed and 11 deceased during the study period. AUC-CSH indexes were associated with EFS using PET gradient-based (P = 0.034) and 50% threshold (P = 0.02) segmentation methods, on multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using optimum cutoff of 16.7 SUVmax and 12.7 mL total MTV were significant predictors of EFS. Combining SUVmax and AUC-CSH index in 3 subgroups, patients with higher intratumoral heterogeneity and higher SUVmax were associated with worse outcome (log-rank, P = 0.026). Similarly, patients with higher intratumoral heterogeneity tumors and higher MTV had worse prognosis (log-rank, P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity using FDG PET was a prognostic factor for EFS in patients with primary HPV (+) OPSCC. The combined predictive effect of FDG avidity, metabolic tumor burden, and intratumoral heterogeneity provided prognostic survival information in these patients.
Authors: Jianhua Yan; Jason Lim Chu-Shern; Hoi Yin Loi; Lih Kin Khor; Arvind K Sinha; Swee Tian Quek; Ivan W K Tham; David Townsend Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kyoungjune Pak; Gi Jeong Cheon; Hyun-Yeol Nam; Seong-Jang Kim; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; E Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Abhinav K Jha; Esther Mena; Brian Caffo; Saeed Ashrafinia; Arman Rahmim; Eric Frey; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-03-03
Authors: Thong Chotchutipan; Benjamin S Rosen; Peter G Hawkins; Jae Y Lee; Anjali L Saripalli; Dharmesh Thakkar; Avraham Eisbruch; Issam El Naqa; Michelle L Mierzwa Journal: Head Neck Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 3.147