Literature DB >> 2323227

Common fragile sites in man and three closely related primate species.

D F Smeets1, F A van de Klundert.   

Abstract

The expression of common fragile sites was studied in peripheral lymphocytes of man, gorilla, chimpanzee, and orangutan after induction with aphidicolin, methotrexate, or fluorodeoxyuridine. As far as the chromosomal localization is concerned, it appears that many of these sites have been highly conserved during primate evolution. However, differences were found in the relative expression of certain sites. In all four species, mapping of approximately 500 lesions disclosed the most breakage-prone common fragile sites, at which about 90% of all induced aberrations were localized. Comparison of chromosome regions involved in evolutionary changes to fragile sites in the four primate species revealed 30 sites that were located at or close to the same chromosomal band. However, no correlation was found between the relative expression of a certain common fragile site in vitro and a potential involvement of this chromosomal site in evolutionary changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2323227     DOI: 10.1159/000132885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  15 in total

1.  Molecular cloning of the breakpoints of a complex Philadelphia chromosome translocation: identification of a repeated region on chromosome 17.

Authors:  T W McKeithan; L Warshawsky; R Espinosa; M M LeBeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Sequence conservation at human and mouse orthologous common fragile regions, FRA3B/FHIT and Fra14A2/Fhit.

Authors:  T Shiraishi; T Druck; K Mimori; J Flomenberg; L Berk; H Alder; W Miller; K Huebner; C M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: a multinomial statistical model.

Authors:  U Böhm; P F Dahm; B F McAllister; I F Greenbaum
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Evolution versus constitution: differences in chromosomal inversion.

Authors:  S Schmidt; U Claussen; T Liehr; A Weise
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Conservation of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in Papionini (Primates) species and humans.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Francisca Garcia; Lutz Frönicke; Montserrat Ponsà; Josep Egozcue; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Fragile sites in human and Macaca fascicularis chromosomes are breakpoints in chromosome evolution.

Authors:  A Ruiz-Herrera; M Ponsà; F García; J Egozcue; M García
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Adenovirus type 12-induced fragility of the human RNU2 locus requires U2 small nuclear RNA transcriptional regulatory elements.

Authors:  A D Bailey; Z Li; T Pavelitz; A M Weiner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  FANCD2 binding identifies conserved fragile sites at large transcribed genes in avian cells.

Authors:  Constanze Pentzold; Shiraz Ali Shah; Niels Richard Hansen; Benoît Le Tallec; Andaine Seguin-Orlando; Michelle Debatisse; Michael Lisby; Vibe H Oestergaard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Topoisomerase II- and condensin-dependent breakage of MEC1ATR-sensitive fragile sites occurs independently of spindle tension, anaphase, or cytokinesis.

Authors:  Nadia Hashash; Anthony L Johnson; Rita S Cha
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.