Literature DB >> 23228512

Action selection in multi-effector decision making.

Seth Madlon-Kay1, Bijan Pesaran, Nathaniel D Daw.   

Abstract

Decision making and reinforcement learning over movements suffer from the curse of dimensionality: the space of possible movements is too vast to search or even represent in its entirety. When actions involve only a single effector, this problem can be ameliorated by considering that effector separately; accordingly, the brain's sensorimotor systems can subdivide choice by representing values and actions separately for each effector. However, for many actions, such as playing the piano, the value of an action by an effector (e.g., a hand) depends inseparably on the actions of other effectors. By definition, the values of such coordinated multi-effector actions cannot be represented by effector-specific action values, such as those that have been most extensively investigated in parietal and premotor regions. For such actions, one possible solution is to choose according to more abstract valuations over different goods or options, which can then be mapped onto the necessary motor actions. Such an approach separates the learning and decision problem, which will often be lower-dimensional than the space of possible movements, from the multi-effector movement planning problem. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is thought to contain goods-based value signals, so we hypothesized that this region might preferentially drive multi-effector action selection. To examine how the brain solves this problem, we used fMRI to compare patterns of BOLD activity in humans during reward learning tasks in which options were selected through either unimanual or bimanual actions, and in which the response requirements in the latter condition inseparably coupled valuation across both hands. We found value signals in the bilateral medial motor cortex and vmPFC, and consistent with previous studies, the medial motor value signals contained contra-lateral biases indicating effector-specificity, while the vmPFC value signals did not exhibit detectable effector specificity. Although neither region's value signaling differed significantly between bimanual and unimanual conditions, the vmPFC value region showed greater connectivity with the medial motor cortex during bimanual than during unimanual choices. The specific region implicated, the anterior mid-cingulate cortex, is thought to act as a hub that links subjective value signals to motor control centers. These results are consistent with the idea that while valuation for unilateral actions may be subserved by an effector-specific network, complex multi-effector actions preferentially implicate communication between motor regions and prefrontal regions, which may reflect increased top-down input into motor regions to guide action selection.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228512      PMCID: PMC3580036          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  97 in total

1.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Comparing apples and oranges: using reward-specific and reward-general subjective value representation in the brain.

Authors:  Dino J Levy; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Role of the supplementary motor area and the right premotor cortex in the coordination of bimanual finger movements.

Authors:  N Sadato; Y Yonekura; A Waki; H Yamada; Y Ishii
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section.

Authors:  C Brinkman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neurons in anterior cingulate cortex multiplex information about reward and action.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Michael L Platt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Ventromedial frontal lobe damage disrupts value maximization in humans.

Authors:  Nathalie Camille; Cathryn A Griffiths; Khoi Vo; Lesley K Fellows; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dissociable effects of subtotal lesions within the macaque orbital prefrontal cortex on reward-guided behavior.

Authors:  Peter H Rudebeck; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural mechanisms of foraging.

Authors:  Nils Kolling; Timothy E J Behrens; Rogier B Mars; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Separable learning systems in the macaque brain and the role of orbitofrontal cortex in contingent learning.

Authors:  Mark E Walton; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark J Buckley; Peter H Rudebeck; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Reinforcement learning models and their neural correlates: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Poornima Kumar; Simon B Eickhoff; Alexandre Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  The challenge of understanding the brain: where we stand in 2015.

Authors:  John Lisman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Effector-dependent stochastic reference frame transformations alter decision-making.

Authors:  T Scott Murdison; Dominic I Standage; Philippe Lefèvre; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Bursts and heavy tails in temporal and sequential dynamics of foraging decisions.

Authors:  Kanghoon Jung; Hyeran Jang; Jerald D Kralik; Jaeseung Jeong
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Learning under social versus nonsocial uncertainty: A meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Mario Martinez-Saito; Elena Gorina
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.399

6.  Identifying motor functional neurological disorder using resting-state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jennifer Wegrzyk; Valeria Kebets; Jonas Richiardi; Silvio Galli; Dimitri Van de Ville; Selma Aybek
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Idiosyncratic representation of peripersonal space depends on the success of one's own motor actions, but also the successful actions of others!

Authors:  Yann Coello; François Quesque; Maria-Francesca Gigliotti; Laurent Ott; Jean-Luc Bruyelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.