INTRODUCTION: Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. The purpose of this study is to identify areas of neurodegeneration in glaucoma utilizing 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters with whole-brain voxel-based analysis (VBA) and determine whether these parameters correlate with disease severity. METHODS: Twenty-five glaucoma patients and 25 age-matched healthy volunteers were prospectively examined. Clinical glaucoma severity was assessed utilizing static threshold visual field parameters. All subjects underwent 3 T MRI utilizing a DTI sequence (repetition time/echo time 13,000/68.9 ms, maximal b value 800 s/mm(2) along 30 directions) and an anatomic sequence to provide structural information. All data sets were processed by VBA. Brain fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) were compared in the two groups. Correlation between DTI parameters and glaucoma stage were determined. RESULTS: The bilateral optic radiations and chiasma of glaucoma patients demonstrated statistically significantly lower fractional anisotropy (p < 0.05). Optic radiation RD was similarly decreased in glaucoma patients (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences noted in MD or AD between the two groups (p > 0.05). Optic chiasm fractional anisotropy values were negatively correlated with glaucoma stage (r = -0.53, p < 0.05) and optic radiation RD values positively correlated (left r = 0.45, p < 0.05; right = 0.38, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: DTI parameters fractional anisotropy and RD are altered in the optic chiasm and radiations of glaucoma patients. As fractional anisotropy and RD also correlate with glaucoma stage, these values could serve as potential noninvasive markers of disease severity.
INTRODUCTION:Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. The purpose of this study is to identify areas of neurodegeneration in glaucoma utilizing 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters with whole-brain voxel-based analysis (VBA) and determine whether these parameters correlate with disease severity. METHODS: Twenty-five glaucomapatients and 25 age-matched healthy volunteers were prospectively examined. Clinical glaucoma severity was assessed utilizing static threshold visual field parameters. All subjects underwent 3 T MRI utilizing a DTI sequence (repetition time/echo time 13,000/68.9 ms, maximal b value 800 s/mm(2) along 30 directions) and an anatomic sequence to provide structural information. All data sets were processed by VBA. Brain fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) were compared in the two groups. Correlation between DTI parameters and glaucoma stage were determined. RESULTS: The bilateral optic radiations and chiasma of glaucomapatients demonstrated statistically significantly lower fractional anisotropy (p < 0.05). Optic radiation RD was similarly decreased in glaucomapatients (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences noted in MD or AD between the two groups (p > 0.05). Optic chiasm fractional anisotropy values were negatively correlated with glaucoma stage (r = -0.53, p < 0.05) and optic radiation RD values positively correlated (left r = 0.45, p < 0.05; right = 0.38, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: DTI parameters fractional anisotropy and RD are altered in the optic chiasm and radiations of glaucomapatients. As fractional anisotropy and RD also correlate with glaucoma stage, these values could serve as potential noninvasive markers of disease severity.
Authors: Lars T Westlye; Kristine B Walhovd; Anders M Dale; Atle Bjørnerud; Paulina Due-Tønnessen; Andreas Engvig; Håkon Grydeland; Christian K Tamnes; Ylva Ostby; Anders M Fjell Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: S A Smith; Z R Williams; J N Ratchford; S D Newsome; S K Farrell; J A D Farrell; A Gifford; N R Miller; P C M van Zijl; P A Calabresi; D S Reich Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Bozzali; A Falini; M Franceschi; M Cercignani; M Zuffi; G Scotti; G Comi; M Filippi Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Jean C Augustinack; Karl Helmer; Kristen E Huber; Sita Kakunoori; Lilla Zöllei; Bruce Fischl Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Kevin C Chan; Yu Yu; Shuk Han Ng; Heather K Mak; Yolanda W Y Yip; Yolandi van der Merwe; Tianmin Ren; Jasmine S Y Yung; Sayantan Biswas; Xu Cao; Ying Chau; Christopher K S Leung Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Gala Beykin; Anthony M Norcia; Vivek J Srinivasan; Alfredo Dubra; Jeffrey L Goldberg Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 21.198