BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a well-known relationship between MS and damage to the optic nerve, but advanced, quantitative MR imaging methods have not been applied to large cohorts. Our objective was to determine whether a short imaging protocol (< 10 minutes), implemented with standard hardware, could detect abnormal water diffusion in the optic nerves of patients with MS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined water diffusion in human optic nerves via DTI in the largest MS cohort reported to date (104 individuals, including 38 optic nerves previously affected by optic neuritis). We also assessed whether such abnormalities are associated with loss of visual acuity (both high and low contrast) and damage to the retinal nerve fiber layer (assessed via optical coherence tomography). RESULTS: The most abnormal diffusion was found in the optic nerves of patients with SPMS, especially in optic nerves previously affected by optic neuritis (19% drop in FA). DTI abnormalities correlated with both retinal nerve fiber layer thinning (correlation coefficient, 0.41) and loss of visual acuity, particularly at high contrast and in nerves previously affected by optic neuritis (correlation coefficient, 0.54). However, diffusion abnormalities were overall less pronounced than retinal nerve fiber layer thinning. CONCLUSIONS: DTI is sensitive to optic nerve damage in patients with MS, but a short imaging sequence added to standard clinical protocols may not be the most reliable indicator of optic nerve damage.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a well-known relationship between MS and damage to the optic nerve, but advanced, quantitative MR imaging methods have not been applied to large cohorts. Our objective was to determine whether a short imaging protocol (< 10 minutes), implemented with standard hardware, could detect abnormal water diffusion in the optic nerves of patients with MS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined water diffusion in human optic nerves via DTI in the largest MS cohort reported to date (104 individuals, including 38 optic nerves previously affected by optic neuritis). We also assessed whether such abnormalities are associated with loss of visual acuity (both high and low contrast) and damage to the retinal nerve fiber layer (assessed via optical coherence tomography). RESULTS: The most abnormal diffusion was found in the optic nerves of patients with SPMS, especially in optic nerves previously affected by optic neuritis (19% drop in FA). DTI abnormalities correlated with both retinal nerve fiber layer thinning (correlation coefficient, 0.41) and loss of visual acuity, particularly at high contrast and in nerves previously affected by optic neuritis (correlation coefficient, 0.54). However, diffusion abnormalities were overall less pronounced than retinal nerve fiber layer thinning. CONCLUSIONS: DTI is sensitive to optic nerve damage in patients with MS, but a short imaging sequence added to standard clinical protocols may not be the most reliable indicator of optic nerve damage.
Authors: Daniel S Reich; Seth A Smith; Kathleen M Zackowski; Eliza M Gordon-Lipkin; Craig K Jones; Jonathan A D Farrell; Susumu Mori; Peter C M van Zijl; Peter A Calabresi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-08-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jonathan A D Farrell; Bennett A Landman; Craig K Jones; Seth A Smith; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: R T Naismith; J Xu; N T Tutlam; A Snyder; T Benzinger; J Shimony; J Shepherd; K Trinkaus; A H Cross; S-K Song Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jiangyang Zhang; Melina Jones; Cynthia A DeBoy; Daniel S Reich; Jonathan A D Farrell; Paul N Hoffman; John W Griffin; Kazim A Sheikh; Michael I Miller; Susumu Mori; Peter A Calabresi Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Matthew D Budde; Joong Hee Kim; Hsiao-Fang Liang; Robert E Schmidt; John H Russell; Anne H Cross; Sheng-Kwei Song Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Junqian Xu; Shu-Wei Sun; Robert T Naismith; Abraham Z Snyder; Anne H Cross; Sheng-Kwei Song Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: S D Roosendaal; J J G Geurts; H Vrenken; H E Hulst; K S Cover; J A Castelijns; P J W Pouwels; F Barkhof Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Scott Kolbe; Caron Chapman; Thanh Nguyen; Clare Bajraszewski; Leigh Johnston; Michael Kean; Peter Mitchell; Mark Paine; Helmut Butzkueven; Trevor Kilpatrick; Gary Egan Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-01-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ha-Kyu Jeong; Blake E Dewey; Jane A T Hirtle; Patrick Lavin; Subramaniam Sriram; Siddharama Pawate; John C Gore; Adam W Anderson; Hakmook Kang; Seth A Smith Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mansi Bharat Parekh; Abhijit Achyut Gurjarpadhye; Martin A C Manoukian; Arita Dubnika; Jayakumar Rajadas; Mohammed Inayathullah Journal: Radiol Open J Date: 2015-12-11
Authors: David A Paul; Emma Strawderman; Alejandra Rodriguez; Ricky Hoang; Colleen L Schneider; Sam Haber; Benjamin L Chernoff; Ismat Shafiq; Zoë R Williams; G Edward Vates; Bradford Z Mahon Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-07-08