Literature DB >> 23223370

Cry1-/- circadian rhythmicity depends on SCN intercellular coupling.

Jennifer A Evans1, Haiyun Pan, Andrew C Liu, David K Welsh.   

Abstract

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the central pacemaker organizing circadian rhythms of behavior and physiology. At the cellular level, the mammalian clock consists of autoregulatory feedback loops involving a set of "clock genes," including the Cryptochrome (Cry) genes, Cry1 and Cry2. Experimental evidence suggests that Cry1 and Cry2 play distinct roles in circadian clock function. In mice, Cry1 is required for sustained circadian rhythms in dissociated SCN neurons or fibroblasts but not in organotypic SCN slices or at the behavioral level, whereas Cry2 is not required at any of these levels. It has been argued that coupling among SCN cellular oscillators compensates for clock gene defects to preserve oscillatory function. Here we test this hypothesis in Cry1(-/-) mice by first disrupting intercellular coupling in vivo using constant light (resulting in behavioral arrhythmicity) and then examining circadian clock gene expression in SCN slices at the single cell level. In this manner, we were able to test the role of intercellular coupling without drugs and while preserving tissue organization, avoiding the confounding influences of more invasive manipulations. Cry1(-/-) mice (as well as control Cry2(-/-) mice) bearing the PER2::LUC knock-in reporter were transferred from a standard light:dark cycle to constant bright light (~650 lux) to induce arrhythmic locomotor patterns. In SCN slices from these animals, we used bioluminescence imaging to monitor PER2::LUC expression in single cells. We show that SCN slices from rhythmic Cry1(-/-) and Cry2(-/-) mice had similarly high percentages of functional single-cell oscillators. In contrast, SCN slices from arrhythmic Cry1(-/-) mice had significantly fewer rhythmic cells than SCN slices from arrhythmic Cry2(-/-) mice. Thus, constant light in vivo disrupted intercellular SCN coupling to reveal a cell-autonomous circadian defect in Cry1(-/-) cells that is normally compensated by intercellular coupling in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23223370      PMCID: PMC3578226          DOI: 10.1177/0748730412461246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  44 in total

1.  Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J ASCHOFF
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1960

Review 2.  Come together, right...now: synchronization of rhythms in a mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Sara J Aton; Erik D Herzog
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Circadian gene expression in individual fibroblasts: cell-autonomous and self-sustained oscillators pass time to daughter cells.

Authors:  Emi Nagoshi; Camille Saini; Christoph Bauer; Thierry Laroche; Felix Naef; Ueli Schibler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Real-time reporting of circadian-regulated gene expression by luciferase imaging in plants and mammalian cells.

Authors:  David K Welsh; Takato Imaizumi; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for maintenance of circadian rhythms.

Authors:  G T van der Horst; M Muijtjens; K Kobayashi; R Takano; S Kanno; M Takao; J de Wit; A Verkerk; A P Eker; D van Leenen; R Buijs; D Bootsma; J H Hoeijmakers; A Yasui
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Effects of preparation time on phase of cultured tissues reveal complexity of circadian organization.

Authors:  Tomoko Yoshikawa; Shin Yamazaki; Michael Menaker
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative limb of the circadian clock feedback loop.

Authors:  K Kume; M J Zylka; S Sriram; L P Shearman; D R Weaver; X Jin; E S Maywood; M H Hastings; S M Reppert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Constant light desynchronizes mammalian clock neurons.

Authors:  Hidenobu Ohta; Shin Yamazaki; Douglas G McMahon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide mediates circadian rhythmicity and synchrony in mammalian clock neurons.

Authors:  Sara J Aton; Christopher S Colwell; Anthony J Harmar; James Waschek; Erik D Herzog
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-06       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Bioluminescence imaging of individual fibroblasts reveals persistent, independently phased circadian rhythms of clock gene expression.

Authors:  David K Welsh; Seung-Hee Yoo; Andrew C Liu; Joseph S Takahashi; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  19 in total

1.  Genetic redundancy strengthens the circadian clock leading to a narrow entrainment range.

Authors:  A Erzberger; G Hampp; A E Granada; U Albrecht; H Herzel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Collective timekeeping among cells of the master circadian clock.

Authors:  Jennifer A Evans
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 3.  Animal Cryptochromes: Divergent Roles in Light Perception, Circadian Timekeeping and Beyond.

Authors:  Alicia K Michael; Jennifer L Fribourgh; Russell N Van Gelder; Carrie L Partch
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  The central clock controls the daily rhythm of Aqp5 expression in salivary glands.

Authors:  Hitoshi Uchida; Takahiro J Nakamura; Nana N Takasu; Aya Obana-Koshino; Hitomi Ono; Takeshi Todo; Takayoshi Sakai; Wataru Nakamura
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 5.  In synch but not in step: Circadian clock circuits regulating plasticity in daily rhythms.

Authors:  J A Evans; M R Gorman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Cellular circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus remain coupled in the absence of connexin-36.

Authors:  Tanja Diemer; Dominic Landgraf; Takako Noguchi; Haiyun Pan; Jose L Moreno; David K Welsh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  The duper mutation reveals previously unsuspected functions of Cryptochrome 1 in circadian entrainment and heart disease.

Authors:  Chip Sisson; Michael Seifu Bahiru; Emily N C Manoogian; Eric L Bittman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Light evokes rapid circadian network oscillator desynchrony followed by gradual phase retuning of synchrony.

Authors:  Logan Roberts; Tanya L Leise; Takako Noguchi; Alexis M Galschiodt; Jerry H Houl; David K Welsh; Todd C Holmes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Role of core circadian clock genes in hormone release and target tissue sensitivity in the reproductive axis.

Authors:  Aritro Sen; Hanne M Hoffmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.102

10.  Cryptochrome 1 regulates the circadian clock through dynamic interactions with the BMAL1 C terminus.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Chelsea L Gustafson; Patrick J Sammons; Sanjoy K Khan; Nicole C Parsley; Chidambaram Ramanathan; Hsiau-Wei Lee; Andrew C Liu; Carrie L Partch
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.