Literature DB >> 23222942

Evaluation of gravid traps for the collection of Culex quinquefasciatus, a vector of lymphatic filariasis in Tanzania.

Seth R Irish1, Sarah J Moore, Yahya A Derua, Jane Bruce, Mary M Cameron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have suggested that gravid traps might be useful for collection of mosquitoes, particularly Culex quinquefasciatus, to monitor transmission of the nematode Wuchereria bancrofti (xenomonitoring), there has not been a study to see which of the currently available gravid traps is most effective in endemic areas. The present study evaluated the comparative efficacy for collection of Cx quinquefasciatus of four commercially available gravid traps: the CDC, Frommer Updraft, Reiter-Cummings and Harris County traps.
METHOD: Trap evaluations were conducted in two locations in Tanzania, Ifakara and Tanga. Mosquitoes collected were identified to species, sex, and gonotrophic status.
RESULTS: In both locations, the CDC gravid trap collected the highest number of mosquitoes, the highest number of Cx quinquefasciatus, and the highest proportion of gravid mosquitoes. Although it damaged the highest proportion of mosquitoes as they passed through the trap fan, the CDC gravid trap also contained the highest number of living mosquitoes, when the traps were collected in the morning. The CDC gravid traps collected significantly more phlebotomine sandflies than the other traps and in Tanga, where they were more frequent, the highest number of biting midges.
CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of all four gravid traps should encourage the sampling of Cx quinquefasciatus where it is an important disease vector or nuisance mosquito. The unexpected collection of phlebotomine sandflies and biting midges indicates that gravid traps might usefully collect other insects, including those of medical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23222942     DOI: 10.1093/trstmh/trs001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0035-9203            Impact factor:   2.184


  22 in total

1.  Molecular xenomonitoring (MX) and transmission assessment survey (TAS) of lymphatic filariasis elimination in two villages, Menoufyia Governorate, Egypt.

Authors:  M A Moustafa; M M I Salamah; H S Thabet; R A Tawfik; M M Mehrez; D M Hamdy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Comparison of Methods for Xenomonitoring in Vectors of Lymphatic Filariasis in Northeastern Tanzania.

Authors:  Seth R Irish; William M B Stevens; Yahya A Derua; Thomas Walker; Mary M Cameron
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 3.  The use of molecular xenomonitoring for surveillance of mosquito-borne diseases.

Authors:  Mary M Cameron; Anita Ramesh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A comprehensive assessment of lymphatic filariasis in Sri Lanka six years after cessation of mass drug administration.

Authors:  Ramakrishna U Rao; Kumara C Nagodavithana; Sandhya D Samarasekera; Asha D Wijegunawardana; Welmillage D Y Premakumara; Samudrika N Perera; Sunil Settinayake; J Phillip Miller; Gary J Weil
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-11-13

5.  Molecular xenomonitoring using mosquitoes to map lymphatic filariasis after mass drug administration in American Samoa.

Authors:  Mark A Schmaedick; Amanda L Koppel; Nils Pilotte; Melissa Torres; Steven A Williams; Stephen L Dobson; Patrick J Lammie; Kimberly Y Won
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-08-14

6.  Personal messages reduce vandalism and theft of unattended scientific equipment.

Authors:  B-Markus Clarin; Eleftherios Bitzilekis; Björn M Siemers; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 7.781

7.  Lymphatic filariasis control in Tanga Region, Tanzania: status after eight rounds of mass drug administration.

Authors:  Paul E Simonsen; Yahya A Derua; Stephen M Magesa; Erling M Pedersen; Anna-Sofie Stensgaard; Mwelecele N Malecela; William N Kisinza
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Development of a gravid trap for collecting live malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.l.

Authors:  Sisay Dugassa; Jenny M Lindh; Florence Oyieke; Wolfgang R Mukabana; Steven W Lindsay; Ulrike Fillinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transmission assessment surveys (TAS) to define endpoints for lymphatic filariasis mass drug administration: a multicenter evaluation.

Authors:  Brian K Chu; Michael Deming; Nana-Kwadwo Biritwum; Windtaré R Bougma; Améyo M Dorkenoo; Maged El-Setouhy; Peter U Fischer; Katherine Gass; Manuel Gonzalez de Peña; Leda Mercado-Hernandez; Dominique Kyelem; Patrick J Lammie; Rebecca M Flueckiger; Upendo J Mwingira; Rahmah Noordin; Irene Offei Owusu; Eric A Ottesen; Alexandre Pavluck; Nils Pilotte; Ramakrishna U Rao; Dilhani Samarasekera; Mark A Schmaedick; Sunil Settinayake; Paul E Simonsen; Taniawati Supali; Fasihah Taleo; Melissa Torres; Gary J Weil; Kimberly Y Won
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-12-05

10.  Evaluation of the influence of electric nets on the behaviour of oviposition site seeking Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  Sisay Dugassa; Jenny M Lindh; Steve J Torr; Steven W Lindsay; Ulrike Fillinger
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.