BACKGROUND: Researchers have used various methods to describe and quantify the work of nurses. Many of these studies were focused on nursing in general care settings; therefore, less is known about the unique work nurses perform in intensive care units (ICUs). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to observe adult and pediatric ICU nurses in order to quantify and compare the duration and frequency of nursing tasks across four ICUs as well as within two discrete workflows: nurse handoffs at shift change and patient interdisciplinary rounds. METHODS: A behavioral task analysis of adult and pediatric nurses was used to allow unobtrusive, real-time observation. A total of 147 hours of observation were conducted in an adult medical-surgical, a cardiac, a pediatric, and a neonatal ICU at one rural, tertiary care community teaching hospital. RESULTS: Over 75% of ICU nurses' time was spent on patient care activities. Approximately 50% of this time was spent on direct patient care, over 20% on care coordination, 28% on nonpatient care, and approximately 2% on indirect patient care activities. Variations were observed between units; for example, nurses in the two adult units spent more time using monitors and devices. A high rate and variety of tasks were also observed: Nurses performed about 125 activities per hour, averaging a switch between tasks every 29 seconds. DISCUSSION: This study provides useful information about how nurses spend their time in various ICUs. The methodology can be used in future research to examine changes in work related to, for example, implementation of health information technology.
BACKGROUND: Researchers have used various methods to describe and quantify the work of nurses. Many of these studies were focused on nursing in general care settings; therefore, less is known about the unique work nurses perform in intensive care units (ICUs). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to observe adult and pediatric ICU nurses in order to quantify and compare the duration and frequency of nursing tasks across four ICUs as well as within two discrete workflows: nurse handoffs at shift change and patient interdisciplinary rounds. METHODS: A behavioral task analysis of adult and pediatric nurses was used to allow unobtrusive, real-time observation. A total of 147 hours of observation were conducted in an adult medical-surgical, a cardiac, a pediatric, and a neonatal ICU at one rural, tertiary care community teaching hospital. RESULTS: Over 75% of ICU nurses' time was spent on patient care activities. Approximately 50% of this time was spent on direct patient care, over 20% on care coordination, 28% on nonpatient care, and approximately 2% on indirect patient care activities. Variations were observed between units; for example, nurses in the two adult units spent more time using monitors and devices. A high rate and variety of tasks were also observed: Nurses performed about 125 activities per hour, averaging a switch between tasks every 29 seconds. DISCUSSION: This study provides useful information about how nurses spend their time in various ICUs. The methodology can be used in future research to examine changes in work related to, for example, implementation of health information technology.
Authors: David H Wong; Yvonne Gallegos; Matthew B Weinger; Sara Clack; Jason Slagle; Cynthia T Anderson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Martha Shively; Thomas Rutledge; Barbara A Rose; Patricia Graham; Rebecca Long; Erin Stucky; Matthew B Weinger; Timothy Dresselhaus Journal: J Healthc Qual Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.095
Authors: Laurie D Wolf; Patricia Potter; Jennifer A Sledge; Stuart B Boxerman; Deborah Grayson; Bradley Evanoff Journal: Hum Factors Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Tosha B Wetterneck; Jamie A Lapin; Daniel J Krueger; G Talley Holman; John W Beasley; Ben-Tzion Karsh Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Matthew B Weinger; Roger Brown; Randi S Cartmill; Jason Slagle; Kara S Van Roy; James M Walker; Kenneth E Wood Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; Bashar Alyousef; Roger L Brown; Randi S Cartmill; Kerry McGuire; Peter L T Hoonakker; Jason Slagle; Kara S Van Roy; James M Walker; Matthew B Weinger; Anping Xie; Kenneth E Wood Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Ayse P Gurses; Richard Holden; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Enid Montague; Joy Rodriguez; Tosha B Wetterneck Journal: Rev Hum Factors Ergon Date: 2013-09-01
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Peter Hoonakker; Richard Holden; Ayse P Gurses Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Jochen Profit; Eileen T Lake; Jessica B Liu; Lee M Sanders; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Daniel L Young; Jason Seltzer; Mary Glover; Caroline Outten; Annette Lavezza; Earl Mantheiy; Ann M Parker; Dale M Needham Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Jie Xu; Carrie Reale; Jason M Slagle; Shilo Anders; Matthew S Shotwell; Timothy Dresselhaus; Matthew B Weinger Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.364