Literature DB >> 23221896

Paramedian vertical palatal bone height for mini-implant insertion: a systematic review.

H Winsauer1, C Vlachojannis1, A Bumann2, J Vlachojannis1, S Chrubasik3.   

Abstract

Paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants is increasingly used to anchor molar distalizers. The aim of this review was to systematically examine the available measurements of vertical palatal bone height (VBH). PUBMED, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched using specific search terms. Hand searches of bibliographies of articles were also performed to identify studies measuring VBH or bone thickness in the human palate. Sixteen studies were included, arising from 19 published articles. Repeat presentations were excluded. Ten of the 11 computed tomogram (CT)-based studies presented data from 956 orthodontic patients on average VBH and its variation at a range of palatal sites. Individual data were not available, and pooling of data was not feasible because of heterogeneity of subjects, different measurement sites, different CT methods and their associated software. The compilation of data did indicate that the region 3-4mm behind the incisive foramen and 3-9mm lateral to the midpalatal suture should normally provide sufficient VBH to anchor molar distalizers. The risks of unwanted effects during distalization should be small, but the limitations listed above and the small numbers of studies available impair the precision of the estimates and do not allow the results to be generalized. Paramedian anchorage in the anterior palate can be recommended for molar distalization but, given the great inter-individual variability of the palatal bone height, it must be preceded by reliable CT-based imaging in patients identified by routine investigations as being at risk.
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221896     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Class II treatment by palatal miniscrew-system appliance: A case report.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Giulia Occhiuto; Emanuele Paoletto; Bortolo Giuliano Maino; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Insertion torque values and success rates for paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants : A retrospective study.

Authors:  Bruno Di Leonardo; Björn Ludwig; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Luca Contardo; Rossano Mura; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Two-dimensional radiographs versus cone-beam computed tomography in planning mini-implant placement: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela-Franco-da Rosa Caetano; Mariana-Quirino-Silveira Soares; Luciana-Butini Oliveira; José-Luiz-Cintra Junqueira; Monikelly-do Carmo-Chagas Nascimento
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

4.  Incidence of pulp sensibility loss of anterior teeth after paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior maxilla.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Jörg A Lisson; Björn Ludwig
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Stability of the anterior arm of three different Hyrax hybrid expanders: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gonzalo de la Iglesia; André Walter; Fernando de la Iglesia; Heinz Winsauer; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018-01

6.  Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study.

Authors:  Sachin Chhatwani; Viola Rose-Zierau; Bassel Haddad; Mohammed Almuzian; Christian Kirschneck; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Weiting Chen; Kaili Zhang; Dongxu Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Description of a Digital Work-Flow for CBCT-Guided Construction of Micro-Implant Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expander.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Vincenzo Quinzi; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Stefano Martina; Orazio Bennici; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Annika Pliska; Caroline Busch; Benedict Wilmes; Michael Wolf; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-10-25

10.  Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness in patients with normal and open vertical skeletal configurations using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Piyoros Suteerapongpun; Tanapan Wattanachai; Apirum Janhom; Polbhat Tripuwabhrut; Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.