Literature DB >> 23221502

Cell-type specific cis-regulatory networks: insights from Hox transcription factors.

Maria Polychronidou1, Ingrid Lohmann.   

Abstract

Hox proteins are a prominent class of transcription factors that specify cell and tissue identities in animal embryos. In sharp contrast to tissue-specifically expressed transcription factors, which coordinate regulatory pathways leading to the differentiation of a selected tissue, Hox proteins are active in many different cell types but are nonetheless able to differentially regulate gene expression in a context-dependent manner. This particular feature makes Hox proteins ideal candidates for elucidating the mechanisms employed by transcription factors to achieve tissue-specific functions in multi-cellular organisms. Here we discuss how the recent genome-wide identification and characterization of Hox cis-regulatory elements has provided insight concerning the molecular mechanisms underlying the high spatiotemporal specificity of Hox proteins. In particular, it was shown that Hox transcriptional outputs depend on the cell-type specific interplay of the different Hox proteins with co-regulatory factors as well as with epigenetic modifiers. Based on these observations it becomes clear that cell-type specific approaches are required for dissecting the tissue-specific Hox regulatory code. Identification and comparative analysis of Hox cis-regulatory elements driving target gene expression in different cell types in combination with analyses on how cofactors, epigenetic modifiers and protein-protein interactions mediate context-dependent Hox function will elucidate the mechanistic basis of tissue-specific gene regulation.

Keywords:  Drosophila; Hox; cofactors; gene regulation; genome-wide; homeodomain; tissue-specific; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23221502      PMCID: PMC3660745          DOI: 10.4161/fly.22939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fly (Austin)        ISSN: 1933-6934            Impact factor:   2.160


  43 in total

Review 1.  CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development.

Authors:  R H Goodman; S Smolik
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Beyond homeosis--HOX function in morphogenesis and organogenesis.

Authors:  James Castelli-Gair Hombría; Bridget Lovegrove
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.880

3.  Direct integration of Hox and segmentation gene inputs during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Brian Gebelein; Daniel J McKay; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Enhancers: emerging roles in cell fate specification.

Authors:  Chin-Tong Ong; Victor G Corces
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Hox proteins meet more partners.

Authors:  R S Mann; M Affolter
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Cell-type-specific nuclei purification from whole animals for genome-wide expression and chromatin profiling.

Authors:  Florian A Steiner; Paul B Talbert; Sivakanthan Kasinathan; Roger B Deal; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Evolutionarily conserved domains required for activation and repression functions of the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax.

Authors:  Ella Tour; Chris Todd Hittinger; William McGinnis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  The INTACT method for cell type-specific gene expression and chromatin profiling in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Roger B Deal; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Collaboration between Smads and a Hox protein in target gene repression.

Authors:  Christopher M Walsh; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Role of HOXA9 in leukemia: dysregulation, cofactors and essential targets.

Authors:  C T Collins; J L Hess
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Deregulation of the HOXA9/MEIS1 axis in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Cailin T Collins; Jay L Hess
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.284

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.