Literature DB >> 17855427

Collaboration between Smads and a Hox protein in target gene repression.

Christopher M Walsh1, Sean B Carroll.   

Abstract

Hox proteins control the differentiation of serially iterated structures in arthropods and chordates by differentially regulating many target genes. It is yet unclear to what extent Hox target gene selection is dependent upon other regulatory factors and how these interactions might affect target gene activation or repression. We find that two Smad proteins, effectors of the Drosophila Dpp/TGF-beta pathway, that are genetically required for the activation of the spalt (sal) gene in the wing, collaborate with the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) to directly repress sal in the haltere. The repression of sal is integrated by a cis-regulatory element (CRE) through a remarkably conserved set of Smad binding sites flanked by Ubx binding sites. If the Ubx binding sites are relocated at a distance from the Smad binding sites, the proteins no longer collaborate to repress gene expression. These results support an emerging view of Hox proteins acting in collaboration with a much more diverse set of transcription factors than has generally been appreciated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17855427     DOI: 10.1242/dev.009522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  40 in total

1.  PKNOX2 expression and regulation in the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells of Fanconi anemia patients and healthy donors.

Authors:  Ilgin Cagnan; Erdal Cosgun; Ozlen Konu; Duygu Uckan; Aysen Gunel-Ozcan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Control of target gene specificity during metamorphosis by the steroid response gene E93.

Authors:  Xiaochun Mou; Dianne M Duncan; Eric H Baehrecke; Ian Duncan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hox gene Ultrabithorax regulates distinct sets of target genes at successive stages of Drosophila haltere morphogenesis.

Authors:  Anastasios Pavlopoulos; Michael Akam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interplay between activin and Hox genes determines the formation of the kidney morphogenetic field.

Authors:  Ella Preger-Ben Noon; Hila Barak; Noga Guttmann-Raviv; Ram Reshef
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin; Eric H Davidson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Hox and senseless antagonism functions as a molecular switch to regulate EGF secretion in the Drosophila PNS.

Authors:  David Li-Kroeger; Lorraine M Witt; H Leighton Grimes; Tiffany A Cook; Brian Gebelein
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Multi-step control of muscle diversity by Hox proteins in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Jonathan Enriquez; Hadi Boukhatmi; Laurence Dubois; Anthony A Philippakis; Martha L Bulyk; Alan M Michelson; Michèle Crozatier; Alain Vincent
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Cell-type specific cis-regulatory networks: insights from Hox transcription factors.

Authors:  Maria Polychronidou; Ingrid Lohmann
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  Perturbation analysis analyzed--athematical modeling of intact and perturbed gene regulatory circuits for animal development.

Authors:  Smadar Ben-Tabou de-Leon
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Cancer genomics identifies regulatory gene networks associated with the transition from dysplasia to advanced lung adenocarcinomas induced by c-Raf-1.

Authors:  Astrid Rohrbeck; Jürgen Borlak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.