Literature DB >> 23220655

A quantitative model of normal Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis and its disruption after stress.

Julia L Richards1, Amanda L Zacharias, Travis Walton, Joshua T Burdick, John Isaac Murray.   

Abstract

The invariant lineage of Caenorhabditis elegans has powerful potential for quantifying developmental variability in normal and stressed embryos. Previous studies of division timing by automated lineage tracing suggested that variability in cell cycle timing is low in younger embryos, but manual lineage tracing of specific lineages suggested that variability may increase for later divisions. We developed improved automated lineage tracing methods that allowroutine lineage tracing through the last round of embryonic cell divisions and we applied these methods to trace the lineage of 18 wild-type embryos. Cell cycle lengths, division axes and cell positions are remarkably consistent among these embryos at all stages, with only slight increase in variability later in development. The resulting quantitative 4-dimensional model of embryogenesis provides a powerful reference dataset to identify defects in mutants or in embryos that have experienced environmental perturbations. We also traced the lineages of embryos imaged at higher temperatures to quantify the decay in developmental robustness under temperature stress. Developmental variability increases modestly at 25°C compared with 22°C and dramatically at 26°C, and we identify homeotic transformations in a subset of embryos grown at 26°C. The deep lineage tracing methods provide a powerful tool for analysis of normal development, gene expression and mutants and we provide a graphical user interface to allow other researchers to explore the average behavior of arbitrary cells in a reference embryo.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220655      PMCID: PMC3548946          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  48 in total

1.  Caenorhabditis elegans T-box genes tbx-9 and tbx-8 are required for formation of hypodermis and body-wall muscle in embryogenesis.

Authors:  Yoshiki Andachi
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The REF-1 family of bHLH transcription factors pattern C. elegans embryos through Notch-dependent and Notch-independent pathways.

Authors:  Alexandre Neves; James R Priess
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 3.  Maintenance of C. elegans.

Authors:  Theresa Stiernagle
Journal:  WormBook       Date:  2006-02-11

4.  The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  J E Sulston; E Schierenberg; J G White; J N Thomson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Automated analysis of embryonic gene expression with cellular resolution in C. elegans.

Authors:  John Isaac Murray; Zhirong Bao; Thomas J Boyle; Max E Boeck; Barbara L Mericle; Thomas J Nicholas; Zhongying Zhao; Matthew J Sandel; Robert H Waterston
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-06-29       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  PLK-1 asymmetry contributes to asynchronous cell division of C. elegans embryos.

Authors:  Yemima Budirahardja; Pierre Gönczy
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  lin-35 Rb and cki-1 Cip/Kip cooperate in developmental regulation of G1 progression in C. elegans.

Authors:  M Boxem; S van den Heuvel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  glp-1 and inductions establishing embryonic axes in C. elegans.

Authors:  H Hutter; R Schnabel
Journal:  Development       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  A negative regulatory loop between microRNA and Hox gene controls posterior identities in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Zhongying Zhao; Thomas J Boyle; Zongzhi Liu; John I Murray; William B Wood; Robert H Waterston
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Fast, high-contrast imaging of animal development with scanned light sheet-based structured-illumination microscopy.

Authors:  Philipp J Keller; Annette D Schmidt; Anthony Santella; Khaled Khairy; Zhirong Bao; Joachim Wittbrodt; Ernst H K Stelzer
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  30 in total

1.  Inferring average generation via division-linked labeling.

Authors:  Tom S Weber; Leïla Perié; Ken R Duffy
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 2.  Combinatorial decoding of the invariant C. elegans embryonic lineage in space and time.

Authors:  Amanda L Zacharias; John Isaac Murray
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.487

3.  Sample path properties of the average generation of a Bellman-Harris process.

Authors:  Gianfelice Meli; Tom S Weber; Ken R Duffy
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of C. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Jonathan S Packer; Qin Zhu; Chau Huynh; Priya Sivaramakrishnan; Elicia Preston; Hannah Dueck; Derek Stefanik; Kai Tan; Cole Trapnell; Junhyong Kim; Robert H Waterston; John I Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Establishment of Signaling Interactions with Cellular Resolution for Every Cell Cycle of Embryogenesis.

Authors:  Long Chen; Vincy Wing Sze Ho; Ming-Kin Wong; Xiaotai Huang; Lu-Yan Chan; Hon Chun Kaoru Ng; Xiaoliang Ren; Hong Yan; Zhongying Zhao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  pop-1/TCF, ref-2/ZIC and T-box factors regulate the development of anterior cells in the C. elegans embryo.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rumley; Elicia A Preston; Dylan Cook; Felicia L Peng; Amanda L Zacharias; Lucy Wu; Ilona Jileaeva; John Isaac Murray
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.148

7.  Gene transcription is coordinated with, but not dependent on, cell divisions during C. elegans embryonic fate specification.

Authors:  Gautham Nair; Travis Walton; John Isaac Murray; Arjun Raj
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Physically asymmetric division of the C. elegans zygote ensures invariably successful embryogenesis.

Authors:  Radek Jankele; Rob Jelier; Pierre Gönczy
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Lineage-specific control of convergent differentiation by a Forkhead repressor.

Authors:  Karolina Mizeracka; Julia M Rogers; Jonathan D Rumley; Shai Shaham; Martha L Bulyk; John I Murray; Maxwell G Heiman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 6.862

10.  Systems-level quantification of division timing reveals a common genetic architecture controlling asynchrony and fate asymmetry.

Authors:  Vincy Wing Sze Ho; Ming-Kin Wong; Xiaomeng An; Daogang Guan; Jiaofang Shao; Hon Chun Kaoru Ng; Xiaoliang Ren; Kan He; Jinyue Liao; Yingjin Ang; Long Chen; Xiaotai Huang; Bin Yan; Yiji Xia; Leanne Lai Hang Chan; King Lau Chow; Hong Yan; Zhongying Zhao
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.