Literature DB >> 23863485

Gene transcription is coordinated with, but not dependent on, cell divisions during C. elegans embryonic fate specification.

Gautham Nair1, Travis Walton, John Isaac Murray, Arjun Raj.   

Abstract

Cell differentiation and proliferation are coordinated during animal development, but the link between them remains uncharacterized. To examine this relationship, we combined single-molecule RNA imaging with time-lapse microscopy to generate high-resolution measurements of transcriptional dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. We found that globally slowing the overall development rate of the embryo by altering temperature or by mutation resulted in cell proliferation and transcription slowing, but maintaining, their relative timings, suggesting that cell division may directly control transcription. However, using mutants with specific defects in cell cycle pathways that lead to abnormal lineages, we found that the order between cell divisions and expression onset can switch, showing that expression of developmental regulators is not strictly dependent on cell division. Delaying cell divisions resulted in only slight changes in absolute expression time, suggesting that expression and proliferation are independently entrained to a separate clock-like process. These changes in relative timing can change the number of cells expressing a gene at a given time, suggesting that timing may help determine which cells adopt particular transcriptional patterns. Our results place limits on the types of mechanisms that are used during normal development to ensure that division timing and fate specification occur at appropriate times.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell division; Gene expression; RNA FISH; Time-lapse; Timing; Transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23863485      PMCID: PMC3737719          DOI: 10.1242/dev.098012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  46 in total

1.  Coupling of zygotic transcription to mitotic control at the Drosophila mid-blastula transition.

Authors:  Xuemin Lu; Jennifer M Li; Olivier Elemento; Saeed Tavazoie; Eric F Wieschaus
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Analysis of multiple ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized Caenorhabditis elegans strains by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Sumeet Sarin; Vincent Bertrand; Henry Bigelow; Alexander Boyanov; Maria Doitsidou; Richard J Poole; Surinder Narula; Oliver Hobert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  cdc-25.2, a C. elegans ortholog of cdc25, is required to promote oocyte maturation.

Authors:  Jiyoung Kim; Ichiro Kawasaki; Yhong-Hee Shim
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Endoderm development in Caenorhabditis elegans: the synergistic action of ELT-2 and -7 mediates the specification→differentiation transition.

Authors:  Erica M Sommermann; Keith R Strohmaier; Morris F Maduro; Joel H Rothman
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 5.  Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis.

Authors:  Dieter Egli; Garrett Birkhoff; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  CDC-25.1 stability is regulated by distinct domains to restrict cell division during embryogenesis in C. elegans.

Authors:  Michaël Hebeisen; Richard Roy
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Automated analysis of embryonic gene expression with cellular resolution in C. elegans.

Authors:  John Isaac Murray; Zhirong Bao; Thomas J Boyle; Max E Boeck; Barbara L Mericle; Thomas J Nicholas; Zhongying Zhao; Matthew J Sandel; Robert H Waterston
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-06-29       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Patrick van den Bogaard; Scott A Rifkin; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Sanjay Tyagi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Scott A Rifkin; Erik Andersen; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Pairing of competitive and topologically distinct regulatory modules enhances patterned gene expression.

Authors:  Itai Yanai; L Ryan Baugh; Jessica J Smith; Casey Roehrig; Shai S Shen-Orr; Julia M Claggett; Andrew A Hill; Donna K Slonim; Craig P Hunter
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Using variability in gene expression as a tool for studying gene regulation.

Authors:  Olivia Padovan-Merhar; Arjun Raj
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2013-08-29

Review 2.  Combinatorial decoding of the invariant C. elegans embryonic lineage in space and time.

Authors:  Amanda L Zacharias; John Isaac Murray
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.487

3.  Timing of Tissue-specific Cell Division Requires a Differential Onset of Zygotic Transcription during Metazoan Embryogenesis.

Authors:  Ming-Kin Wong; Daogang Guan; Kaoru Hon Chun Ng; Vincy Wing Sze Ho; Xiaomeng An; Runsheng Li; Xiaoliang Ren; Zhongying Zhao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  mRNA quantification using single-molecule FISH in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Tatjana Trcek; Timothée Lionnet; Hari Shroff; Ruth Lehmann
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Single mammalian cells compensate for differences in cellular volume and DNA copy number through independent global transcriptional mechanisms.

Authors:  Olivia Padovan-Merhar; Gautham P Nair; Andrew G Biaesch; Andreas Mayer; Steven Scarfone; Shawn W Foley; Angela R Wu; L Stirling Churchman; Abhyudai Singh; Arjun Raj
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Mutagenesis of GATA motifs controlling the endoderm regulator elt-2 reveals distinct dominant and secondary cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Lawrence Du; Sharon Tracy; Scott A Rifkin
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  MED GATA factors promote robust development of the C. elegans endoderm.

Authors:  Morris F Maduro; Gina Broitman-Maduro; Hailey Choi; Francisco Carranza; Allison Chia-Yi Wu; Scott A Rifkin
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Probing and rearranging the transcription factor network controlling the C. elegans endoderm.

Authors:  Tobias Wiesenfahrt; Erin Osborne Nishimura; Janette Y Berg; James D McGhee
Journal:  Worm       Date:  2016-06-10

9.  The function and regulation of the GATA factor ELT-2 in the C. elegans endoderm.

Authors:  Tobias Wiesenfahrt; Janette Y Berg; Erin Osborne Nishimura; Adam G Robinson; Barbara Goszczynski; Jason D Lieb; James D McGhee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Physically asymmetric division of the C. elegans zygote ensures invariably successful embryogenesis.

Authors:  Radek Jankele; Rob Jelier; Pierre Gönczy
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.