Literature DB >> 23219622

Effect of implant design on knee flexion.

Douglas A Dennis1, R David Heekin, Charles R Clark, Jeffrey A Murphy, Tammy L O'Dell, Kimberly A Dwyer.   

Abstract

From March 2006 to August 2008, 93 subjects (186 knees) underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed by eight surgeons at North American centers. This randomized study was conducted to determine whether non-weight-bearing passive flexion was superior for knees receiving a posterior stabilized high flexion device compared to a posterior stabilized standard device in the contra-lateral knee. Weight-bearing single leg active flexion was one secondary endpoint. Follow-up compliance was 92.5%. Results show small, but significant superiority in the motion metrics for the high flexion device compared to the standard device 12 months after surgery, especially for a subgroup of patients with pre-operative flexion less than 120° in both knees. Thus, the ideal candidate for the high flexion device may be one with lesser pre-operative flexion.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219622     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

Review 1.  Post-operative limb position can influence blood loss and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Francesco Traina; Marcello De Fine; Marco Pedrini; Andrea Sambri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In vivo kinematics and ligamentous function of the knee during weight-bearing flexion: an investigation on mid-range flexion of the knee.

Authors:  Zhitao Rao; Chaochao Zhou; Willem A Kernkamp; Timothy E Foster; Hany S Bedair; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Is high flexion total knee arthroplasty a rewarding procedure? An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ting Lei; Hu Qian; Long Hua; Guilherme Moreira de Abreu E Silva; Yihe Hu; Pengfei Lei
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Patients achieved greater range of movement when using high-flexion implants.

Authors:  Canfeng Li; Yi Zeng; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Pengde Kang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature.

Authors:  Peter D H Wall; Bethan L Richards; Andrew Sprowson; Rachelle Buchbinder; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-30

6.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Bryan Chung; Roberta W Scherer; Diana Elbourne; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-06-30

Review 7.  Biomechanical considerations in the design of high-flexion total knee replacements.

Authors:  Cheng-Kung Cheng; Colin J McClean; Yu-Shu Lai; Wen-Chuan Chen; Chang-Hung Huang; Kun-Jhih Lin; Chia-Ming Chang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-06

8.  Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Quadriceps Force and Joint Contact Forces in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Yong-Gon Koh; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Sae Kwang Kwon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.