Literature DB >> 23216055

Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.

Yann Nguyen1, Isabelle Mosnier, Stéphanie Borel, Emmanuelle Ambert-Dahan, Didier Bouccara, Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli, Evelyne Ferrary, Olivier Sterkers.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Residual hearing could be preserved with various arrays ranging from 16 to 18 mm in insertion length and 0.25 to 0.5 mm tip diameter. Whether array insertion is performed through a cochleostomy or a round window, tip diameter is an essential criterion for the array design to improve hearing preservation results.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to report the outcome of patients implanted with electric acoustic cochlear implants with various surgical techniques and array designs.
METHODS: Thirty-two implanted ears (30 patients) were included in this retrospective study. Three array models were inserted: Contour Advance implant (n = 16), Nucleus Hybrid-L (n = 12), and Med-El Flex EAS (n = 4). Postoperative pure tone audiometry was performed at 3 and 12 months after implantation.
RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, hearing preservation within 30 dB was achieved in 50%, 50%, and 84% cases of patients implanted with a Contour Advance, Flex-EAS, and Hybrid-L, respectively. Two patients (Hybrid-L group) had a delayed sudden hearing loss (> 30 dB) 3 months postoperatively and three patients (Contour Advance group) had total hearing loss at 1 year. Best results were achieved using arrays with small tip diameters. Cochleostomy or round window insertion did not affect hearing preservation results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23216055     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2012.723824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  16 in total

1.  Variability of the mental representation of the cochlear anatomy during cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Renato Torres; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Daniele Bernardeschi; Daniele De Seta; Jean Loup Bensimon; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools.

Authors:  Dzemal Gazibegovic; Eva M Bero
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mamelle; Benjamin Granger; Olivier Sterkers; Ghizlene Lahlou; Evelyne Ferrary; Yann Nguyen; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Influence of Scalar Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode on Postinsertion Results.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Robert T Dwyer; Jourdan T Holder; Jameson K Mattingly; Amanda Ortmann; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Carla V Valenzuela; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael S Harris; Leonid M Litvak; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Robert F Labadie; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Effect of a liposomal hyaluronic acid gel loaded with dexamethasone in a guinea pig model after manual or motorized cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mamelle; Naila El Kechai; Benjamin Granger; Olivier Sterkers; Amélie Bochot; Florence Agnely; Evelyne Ferrary; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Experimental Validation of a Three-Dimensional Heat Transfer Model Within the Scala Tympani With Application to Magnetic Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Fateme Esmailie; Mathieu Francoeur; Tim Ameel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  Definition of metrics to evaluate cochlear array insertion forces performed with forceps, insertion tool, or motorized tool in temporal bone specimens.

Authors:  Yann Nguyen; Guillaume Kazmitcheff; Daniele De Seta; Mathieu Miroir; Evelyne Ferrary; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Residual Hearing Preservation with the Evo® Cochlear Implant Electrode Array: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Fabiana Danieli; Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães; Dan Gnansia; Michel Hoen
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Lisandro Leon; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Highly Flexible Silicone Coated Neural Array for Intracochlear Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  P Bhatti; J Van Beek-King; A Sharpe; J Crawford; S Tridandapani; B McKinnon; D Blake
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.