Literature DB >> 22467166

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.

Amy Breman1, Amber N Pursley, Patricia Hixson, Weimin Bi, Patricia Ward, Carlos A Bacino, Chad Shaw, James R Lupski, Arthur Beaudet, Ankita Patel, Sau W Cheung, Ignatia Van den Veyver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) on >1000 fetal samples referred for testing at our institution and to compare these data to published reports.
METHODS: High resolution CMA was offered to women undergoing amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling. Parental samples were obtained concurrently to exclude maternal cell contamination and assist interpretation of copy number variations.
RESULTS: Clinically significant copy number variations were observed in 85/1115 cases (7.6%) overall, and in 45/1075 cases (4.2 %) if 40 abnormal cases with known chromosome abnormalities or familial genomic imbalances were excluded. Eighteen of the 1115 cases had variants of unclear clinical significance (1.6%). Indications yielding the most clinically significant findings were abnormal karyotype/fluorescence in situ hybridization (26/61, 42.6%), family history of chromosomal abnormality (13/137, 9.5%), abnormal ultrasound (38/410, 9.3%), abnormal serum screening (2/37, 5.4%) and advanced maternal age (5/394, 1.3%). Of 1075 cases having no previously known cytogenetic abnormality or family history, 18 (1.7%) had clinically significant genomic changes undetectable by conventional prenatal chromosome analysis.
CONCLUSION: Current experience confirms that the detection rate of CMA for prenatal chromosomal abnormalities surpasses that of conventional karyotype analysis and continues to improve with higher resolution arrays, while maintaining a low frequency of results of unclear clinical significance.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22467166     DOI: 10.1002/pd.3861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  34 in total

1.  Genetic and expression changes in TNF-α as a risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis in northeast India.

Authors:  Somdatta Das; Chitralekha Baruah; Anjan Kumar Saikia; Diptika Tiwari; Sujoy Bose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.

Authors:  Jessica Baker; Cheryl Shuman; David Chitayat; Syed Wasim; Nan Okun; Johannes Keunen; Renee Hofstedter; Rachel Silver
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Characterization of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnancy losses reveals critical genes and loci for human early development.

Authors:  Yiyun Chen; Justin Bartanus; Desheng Liang; Hongmin Zhu; Amy M Breman; Janice L Smith; Hua Wang; Zhilin Ren; Ankita Patel; Pawel Stankiewicz; David S Cram; Sau Wai Cheung; Lingqian Wu; Fuli Yu
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 5.  Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  A comprehensive clinical and genetic study in 127 patients with ID in Kinshasa, DR Congo.

Authors:  Aimé Lumaka; Valerie Race; Hilde Peeters; Anniek Corveleyn; Zeynep Coban-Akdemir; Shalini N Jhangiani; Xiaofei Song; Gerrye Mubungu; Jennifer Posey; James R Lupski; Joris R Vermeesch; Prosper Lukusa; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  The assessment of combined karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray in pregnant women of advanced maternal age: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ye Shi; Jun Ma; Ying Xue; Jing Wang; Bin Yu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

9.  Contribution of genomic copy-number variations in prenatal oral clefts: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Ye Cao; Zhihua Li; Jill A Rosenfeld; Amber N Pursley; Ankita Patel; Jin Huang; Huilin Wang; Min Chen; Xiaofang Sun; Tak Yeung Leung; Sau Wai Cheung; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Perspective on the technical challenges involved in the implementation of array-CGH in prenatal diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Jonathan L A Callaway; Shuwen Huang; Evangelia Karampetsou; John A Crolla
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.