Literature DB >> 23211631

Comparing classic and newer phenotypes in Greek PCOS women: the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and their association with insulin resistance.

V Vaggopoulos1, E Trakakis, C Chrelias, P Panagopoulos, G Basios, S Makridima, V D Sioulas, G Simeonides, G Labos, E Boutati, D Kassanos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, it has been debated whether the new polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes, according to the Rotterdam criteria, share the same metabolic risk with the classic ones (National Institutes of Health 1990). Our study sought to compare the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and glucose homeostasis disorders in Greek women with classic and new PCOS phenotypes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-six Greek PCOS women were recruited and divided into groups according to two of the three Rotterdam criteria that they fulfilled. Two subgroups were formed; the first represented the classic phenotypes and the second the new phenotypes. The clinical, biochemical, and ultrasound characteristics of both groups were explored. All subjects were evaluated for MS and underwent a 2-h glucose tolerance test to assess insulin resistance (IR) as measured by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and MATSUDA indices.
RESULTS: 62.4% of PCOS women were classified as classic NIH phenotypes of which 32 women had MS (prevalence 19.6%). Only 4 patients categorized in the newer phenotypic groups had MS (prevalence 4.1%). Among the subjects with classic phenotypes, 11.7% exhibited impaired glucose tolerance (3-fold higher percentage compared to patients with newer phenotypes). Regarding IR indices, HOMA-IR was significantly higher and QUICKI significantly lower for classic phenotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: Greek PCOS women with classic phenotypes are at increased risk for MS and impaired glucose homeostasis compared to women with newer phenotypes. A subclassification of PCOS permits the earlier recognition and closer surveillance of women whose metabolic profile indicates potential risks for adverse health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23211631     DOI: 10.3275/8771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  27 in total

1.  Assessing the predictive accuracy of QUICKI as a surrogate index for insulin sensitivity using a calibration model.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Gail Sullivan; Michael J Quon
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.461

2.  Metabolic characteristics of women with polycystic ovaries and oligo-amenorrhoea but normal androgen levels: implications for the management of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas M Barber; John A H Wass; Mark I McCarthy; Stephen Franks
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  Higher metabolic risk with National Institutes of Health versus Rotterdam diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovarian syndrome in Turkish women.

Authors:  Inan Anaforoglu; Ekrem Algun; Omer Incecayir; Kerem Ersoy
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp.

Authors:  M Matsuda; R A DeFronzo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage.

Authors:  Ranganath Muniyappa; Sihoon Lee; Hui Chen; Michael J Quon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Clinical and biochemical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome in Korean women.

Authors:  Soo Jin Chae; Jin Ju Kim; Young Min Choi; Kyu Ri Hwang; Byung Chul Jee; Seung Yup Ku; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim; Jung Gu Kim; Shin Yong Moon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Detecting insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: purposes and pitfalls.

Authors:  Richard S Legro; V Daniel Castracane; Robert P Kauffman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 8.  Ultrasound assessment of the polycystic ovary: international consensus definitions.

Authors:  Adam H Balen; Joop S E Laven; Seang-Lin Tan; Didier Dewailly
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome in Taiwanese Chinese women: comparison between Rotterdam 2003 and NIH 1990.

Authors:  Ming-I Hsu; Tsan-Hon Liou; Szu-Yuan Chou; Chuan-Yaw Chang; Chun-Sen Hsu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  National Cholesterol Education Program, second report of the Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults.

Authors:  A Rubinstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  Euglena gracilis deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases: subcellular locations and variations during the cell cycle.

Authors:  A G McLennan; H M Keir
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Sahruh Turkmen; Alebtekin Ahangari; Torbjörn Bäckstrom
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with different polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Akramsadat Dehghani Firoozabadi; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Maryam Eftekhar; Afsar Sadat Tabatabaei Bafghi; Farimah Shamsi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-05-31

4.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in four phenotypes of PCOS and its relationship with androgenic components among Iranian women: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Narges Zaeemzadeh; Shahideh Jahanian Sadatmahalleh; Saeideh Ziaei; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad; Azadeh Mottaghi; Neda Mohamadzadeh; Maryam Movahedinejad
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-04-30

5.  Elucidating the impact of obesity on hormonal and metabolic perturbations in polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes in Indian women.

Authors:  Roshan Dadachanji; Anushree Patil; Beena Joshi; Srabani Mukherjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Polycystic ovary syndrome: insight into pathogenesis and a common association with insulin resistance.

Authors:  Thomas M Barber; George K Dimitriadis; Avgi Andreou; Stephen Franks
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.