Literature DB >> 23210452

Comparison of ThermoCool® Surround Flow catheter versus ThermoCool® catheter in achieving persistent electrical isolation of pulmonary veins: a pilot study.

Emanuele Bertaglia1, Gaetano Fassini, Matteo Anselmino, Giuseppe Stabile, Giuseppe Grandinetti, Antonio De Simone, Leonardo Calò, Claudio Pandozi, Claudio Pratola, Franco Zoppo, Claudio Tondo, Assunta Iuliano, Fiorenzo Gaita.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of the new ThermoCool Surround Flow® catheter (SFc) versus the ThermoCool® (TCc) in achieving persistent circumferential electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: This multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolled patients suffering from paroxysmal AF. Randomization was run in a one-to-one fashion between radiofrequency ablation by TCc or SFc. Aim of PVs ablation was documentation of electrical isolation with exit/entrance block recorded on a circular catheter. Among the 106 enrolled patients, 52 (49.0%) were randomized to TCc and 54 (51.0%) to SFc. Total volume of infused saline solution during the procedure was lower in the SFc than in TCc group (752.7 ± 268.6 mL vs 1,165.9 ± 436.2 mL, P < 0.0001). Number of identified and isolated PVs was similar in the 2 groups. Number of PVs remaining isolated 30 minutes after ablation was higher in the SFc than in TCc group (95.2% vs 90.5%, P < 0.03), mainly driven by acute ablation result in the left PVs (96.1% vs 89.7%, P < 0.04). Complications were seldom and observed only in the TCc group (0% vs 3.84%, P < 0.03). At 6-month follow-up SFc patients reported a trend toward less AF recurrences compared to those in the TCc group (22.9% vs 27.0%, P = 0.69).
CONCLUSION: PV isolation by SFc lowered the rate of left PV early reconnections and reduced the volume of infused saline solution while maintaining the safety profile of AF ablation.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23210452     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  14 in total

Review 1.  Radiation Dose is Significantly Reduced by Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheter During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Vincenzo La Rocca; Vincenzo Schillaci; Alfonso Panella; Gergana Shopova; Felice Nappi; Francesco Urraro; Giovanni Russo; Giovanni Napolitano; Paola Chiariello
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 2.  The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications.

Authors:  Fehmi Keçe; Katja Zeppenfeld; Serge A Trines
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Francesco Solimene; Leonardo Calò; Matteo Anselmino; Antonello Castro; Claudio Pratola; Paolo Golia; Nicola Bottoni; Giuseppe Grandinetti; Antonio De Simone; Vincenzo Schillaci; Emanuele Bertaglia; Roberto De Ponti
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation.

Authors:  Tilman Maurer; Laura Rottner; Hisaki Makimoto; Bruno Reissmann; Christian-H Heeger; Christine Lemes; Thomas Fink; Johannes Riedl; Francesco Santoro; Peter Wohlmuth; Marius Volkmer; Shibu Mathew; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Sohns
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Catheter-tissue contact force for pulmonary veins isolation: a pilot multicentre study on effect on procedure and fluoroscopy time.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Francesco Solimene; Leonardo Calò; Matteo Anselmino; Antonello Castro; Claudio Pratola; Paolo Golia; Nicola Bottoni; Giuseppe Grandinetti; Antonio De Simone; Roberto De Ponti; Serena Dottori; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Acute safety of an open-irrigated ablation catheter with 56-hole porous tip for radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: analysis from 2 observational registry studies.

Authors:  Saumil R Oza; Tina D Hunter; Angelo B Biviano; Gopi Dandamudi; Bengt Herweg; Anshul M Patel; Scott J Pollak; Huijian Wang; Robert S Fishel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-09

7.  Comparison of real-world clinical and economic outcomes between the ThermoCool® SF and ThermoCool® catheters in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Larry Chinitz; Laura J Goldstein; Andrea Barnow; Sonia Maccioni; Mehmet Daskiran; Iftekhar Kalsekar; Rahul Khanna
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-10-04

8.  New technologies for catheter based treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - Everything under control?

Authors:  Mehdi Namdar; Dipen C Shah
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-10-03

9.  Pulmonary vein isolation using new technologies to improve ablation lesion formation: Initial results comparing enhanced catheter tip irrigation (Surround Flow(®)) with contact force measurement (Smarttouch(®)).

Authors:  Stephanie Fichtner; Tilko Reents; Sonia Ammar; Verena Semmler; Susanne Kathan; Roger Dillier; Alexandra Buiatti; Gabriele Hessling; Isabel Deisenhofer
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-07-29

10.  Safety and efficacy of the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Xiao-Fei Gao; Mei-Jun Liu; Chao-Lun Jin; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.