Literature DB >> 32939154

Exploring evolution of maximum growth rates in plankton.

Kevin J Flynn1, David O F Skibinski2.   

Abstract

Evolution has direct and indirect consequences on species-species interactions and the environment. However, Earth systems models describing planktonic activity invariably fail to explicitly consider organism evolution. Here we simulate the evolution of the single most important physiological characteristic of any organism as described in models-its maximum growth rate (μm). Using a low-computational-cost approach, we incorporate the evolution of μm for each of the plankton components in a simple Nutrient-Phytoplankton-Zooplankton -style model such that the fitness advantages and disadvantages in possessing a high μm evolve to become balanced. The model allows an exploration of parameter ranges leading to stresses, which drive the evolution of μm. In applications of the method we show that simulations of climate change give very different projections when the evolution of μm is considered. Thus, production may decline as evolution reshapes growth and trophic dynamics. Additionally, predictions of extinction of species may be overstated in simulations lacking evolution as the ability to evolve under changing environmental conditions supports evolutionary rescue. The model explains why organisms evolved for mature ecosystems (e.g. temperate summer, reliant on local nutrient recycling or mixotrophy), express lower maximum growth rates than do organisms evolved for immature ecosystems (e.g. temperate spring, high resource availability).
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NPZ model; climate change; extinction; plankton evolution

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939154      PMCID: PMC7484936          DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbaa038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plankton Res        ISSN: 0142-7873            Impact factor:   2.455


  37 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate?

Authors:  Caitlin M Dmitriew
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-02

2.  Adaptive evolution of phytoplankton cell size.

Authors:  Lin Jiang; Oscar M E Schofield; Paul G Falkowski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Emergent biogeography of microbial communities in a model ocean.

Authors:  Michael J Follows; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Scott Grant; Sallie W Chisholm
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource-based competition theory.

Authors:  D Titman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The role of functional traits and trade-offs in structuring phytoplankton communities: scaling from cellular to ecosystem level.

Authors:  Elena Litchman; Christopher A Klausmeier; Oscar M Schofield; Paul G Falkowski
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Evolution of competitive fitness in experimental populations of E. coli: what makes one genotype a better competitor than another?

Authors:  R E Lenski; J A Mongold; P D Sniegowski; M Travisano; F Vasi; P J Gerrish; T M Schmidt
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 7.  Microbial maintenance: a critical review on its quantification.

Authors:  Peter van Bodegom
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Evolutionary potential of marine phytoplankton under ocean acidification.

Authors:  Sinéad Collins; Björn Rost; Tatiana A Rynearson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Effects of growth rate, cell size, motion, and elemental stoichiometry on nutrient transport kinetics.

Authors:  Kevin J Flynn; David O F Skibinski; Christian Lindemann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review.

Authors:  Philip K Thornton; Polly J Ericksen; Mario Herrero; Andrew J Challinor
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  1 in total

1.  The maximum growth rate hypothesis is correct for eukaryotic photosynthetic organisms, but not cyanobacteria.

Authors:  T A V Rees; John A Raven
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 10.151

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.