| Literature DB >> 23206658 |
Grzegorz Kurzawski1, Dagmara Dymerska, Pablo Serrano-Fernández, Joanna Trubicka, Bartłomiej Masojć, Anna Jakubowska, Rodney J Scott.
Abstract
During the past decade many new molecular methods for DNA and RNA analysis have emerged. The most popular thus far have been SSCP, HET, CMC, DGGE, RFLP or ASA, which have now been replaced by methods that are more cost effective and less time consuming. Real-time amplification techniques and particularly those with the capacity of multiplexing have become commonly used in laboratory practice. Novel screening methods enable the very rapid examination of large patients series. Use of liquid handling robotics applied to the isolation of DNA or RNA, the normalisation of sample concentration, and standardization of target amplification by PCR have also contributed to a reduced risk of sample contamination and have resulted in laboratory analysis being easier and faster.The aim of this study is the introduction of a few modern techniques, most commonly used in detection of genetic predisposition to cancer.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23206658 PMCID: PMC3551642 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract ISSN: 1731-2302 Impact factor: 2.857
Genes associated with predisposition to cancer family syndromes. The table contains genes studied the most frequently in our centre
| retinoblastoma | up to 90% | |
| breast cancer | up to 80% | |
| ovarian cancer | | |
| | prostate cancer | |
| | colon cancer | |
| haemangioblastoma of the | up to 80% | |
| | cerebellum and retina | |
| | kidney cancer | |
| | pheochromocytoma | |
| colon cancer | up to 90% | |
| endometrial cancer | for male | |
| cancer of the stomach, | up to 70% | |
| | cancer of the biliary tract | for female [ |
| | small bowel cancer | |
| ovarian cancer |
*probability of malignancy during lifetime among mutation carriers.
Figure 1DHPLC elution profile characteristic for c.1786_1788delAAT mutation in gene (solid line) compared to ‘wild’ type (dashed line).
Figure 2Chromatograms for DNA sequencing: studied sequence with c.83C>T mutation in gene (upper) and ‘wild’ sequence (below).
Figure 3Pyrograms: patient with c.2932C>T in gene (upper) and ‘wild’ type (below).
Figure 4Result of MLPA electrophoresis of a sample with deletion of exon 9 in gene (upper) and ‘wild’ type (below).
Figure 5Melting curve and melting peaks charts of a heterozygous mutation in exon 23 in gene during screening by HRMA.
Figure 6TaqMan allelic discrimination for c.677 G>T assay. The G/G genotype is shown as light triangle-shaped dot, the G/T genotype as dark triangle-shaped dot, blank control as round-shaped dot.
Figure 7Melting curve and melting peak charts for mutation in c.178 G>T in (gene (heterozygote) compared with wild type (homozygote) using real-time PCR with Simple probes.
Figure 8Mass spectrum of a sample with c.3959_3962delCAAG mutation in gene. Each peak corresponds with each DNA variant.